An Error Analysis Method for Spatial Heterodyne Interferograms Using Wavelet Transformation
WANG Fang-yuan1, 2, LI Xiao-jing1, 2, YE Song1, 2, LI Shu1, 2, WANG Xin-qiang1, 2*
1. School of Optoelectronic Engineering, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004，China
2. Guangxi Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Information Processing, Guilin 541004，China
Abstract：Spatial Heterodyne Spectroscopy (SHS) is a hyperspectral analysis technique applied in weak matter detection, planetary exploration, and atmospheric remote sensing. Influenced by the complex experimental environment and the weak signal of the measured target, the measurement results of the Spatial Heterodyne Spectrograph are prone to tilted interference fringes and speckle noise in the interferograms, which ultimately affect the accuracy of the measured spectra. To solve these problems, this paper proposes a wavelet transform-based interferogram error analysis method, which effectively evaluates the interferogram's speckle noise level and stripe tilt error, thus providing a theoretical basis for the subsequent error correction. In this paper, Gaussian noise with different standard deviations is added to the error-free simulated interferograms of potassium lamps. The complex wavelet coefficients are extracted by using wavelet decomposition. Three noise estimation methods are used to compute the interferogram data. The results show that the noise estimation results of the spatial correlation wavelet transform method have the smallest deviation from the real value. The Donoho estimation method matches the real value better after the intercept correction. Subsequently, the Db2 wavelet decomposes the potassium lamp interferograms with different noise levels in one wavelet layer and extracts the detail coefficients in the horizontal, diagonal, and vertical directions. Donoho estimation is used to analyze the interferograms for two-dimensional noise analysis, which effectively characterizes the noise levels of the three interferograms in each direction. The research results show that the three directions of the wavelet detail coefficient valuation change respectively in the decomposition to different layers have a similar rule of change: the wavelet detail coefficient valuation and the stripe tilt direction, and the wavelet detail coefficient belongs to the direction of the angle is inversely proportional to the direction of the stripe tilt direction and the wavelet detail coefficient of the direction of the smaller the angle of the stripe tilt direction and the direction of the wavelet detail coefficient of the valuation of the larger, and vice versa, the smaller, and the horizontal direction of the first layer of the decomposition, the diagonal decomposition of the direction to the second layer of the vertical direction of the third layer of the hierarchy conforms to the rule of change. This study is a useful attempt to utilize wavelet decomposition for spatial outlier spectral error analysis and also provides a new way for subsequent correction of interferogram streak tilt error.
Key words：Spatial heterodyne spectroscopy;Noise standard deviation estimate;Interferogram;Wavelet transform
王方原，李晓静，叶 松，李 树，王新强. 采用小波变换的空间外差干涉图误差分析方法[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2025, 45(01): 8-14.
WANG Fang-yuan, LI Xiao-jing, YE Song, LI Shu, WANG Xin-qiang. An Error Analysis Method for Spatial Heterodyne Interferograms Using Wavelet Transformation. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2025, 45(01): 8-14.
[1] Egan M J, Acosta-Maeda T E, Angel S M, et al. Journal of Raman Spectroscopy, 2020, 51(9): 1794.
[2] Gojani A B, Palásti D J, Paul A, et al. Applied Spectroscopy, 2019, 73(12): 1409.
[3] Qiu J, Qi X, Li X, et al. Journal of Raman Spectroscopy, 2019, 50(10): 1602.
[4] Ciaffoni L, Matousek P, Parker W, et al. Applied Spectroscopy, 2021, 75(3): 241.
[5] Zhang Wenli, Liu Zhaoyu, Liang Kun, et al. Scientific Reports, 2022, 12(1): 1423.
[6] ZHANG Ming, PENG Wen, LAI Zhen-quan, et al(张 铭, 彭 文, 赖珍荃, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2019, 39(3): 797.
[7] Grishina S, Kodera P, Goryainov S, et al. Journal of Raman Spectroscopy, 2020, 51(12): 2505.
[8] Egan M J, Angel S M, Sharma S K. Applied Spectroscopy, 2018, 72(6): 933.
[9] Strange K A, Paul K C, Angel S M. Applied Spectroscopy, 2017, 71(2): 250.
[10] Wang J, Liu K, Jin S, et al. Applied Spectroscopy, 2020, 74(2): 130.
[11] Hu G, Xiong W, Shi H, et al. Journal of Raman Spectroscopy, 2016, 47(3): 289.
[12] Chi M, Han X, Xu Y, et al. Applied Spectroscopy, 2019, 73(1): 78.
[13] Kandjani A E, Griffin M J, Ramanathan R, et al. Journal of Raman Spectroscopy, 2013, 44(4): 608.
[14] Qiu J, Li X T, Qi X D. IEEE Photonics Journal, 2019, 11(5): 6802612.
[15] Xi Y, Li Y, Duan Z, et al. Applied Spectroscopy, 2018, 72(12): 1752.
[16] Zhang Zhen, Ye Yicheng, Luo Binyu, et al. Scientific Reports, 2022, 12(1): 22186.
[17] Chen H, Xu W, Broderick N, et al. Journal of Raman Spectroscopy, 2018, 49(9): 1529.
[18] Song Yue, Li Houpu, Zhai Guojun, et al. Scientific Reports, 2021, 11(1): 16988.
[19] Yang Xinlu, Wang Wenbo. Scientific Reports, 2023, 13: 18873.
[20] Zhou Xiaohui. Scientific Reports, 2023, 13(1): 9532.
[21] Ganjalizadeh V, Meena G G, Wall T A, et al. Nature Communications, 2022, 13(1): 1035.
[22] Jiang Shiyi, Xu Yang, Li Danyang, et al. Scientific Reports, 2022, 12(1): 20305.
[23] Soto M A, Ramírez J A, Thévenaz L. Nature Communications, 2016, 7(1): 10870.
[24] Peng Ziran, Wang Guojun. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7(1): 4564.
