|
|
|
|
|
|
| Application of Joint Skewness Algorithm to Select Optimal Wavelengths of Hyperspectral Image for Maize Seed Classification |
| YANG Sai, ZHU Qi-bing*, HUANG Min |
| Key Laboratory of Advanced Process Control for Light Industry (Ministry of Education), Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract As an effective method for the nondestructive measurement of agricultural products quality, hyperspectral imaging technology has been widely studied in the field of seed classification and identification. Feature extraction and optimal wavelength selection are the two critical issues affecting the application of hyperspectral image in the field of seed identification. This study aimed to select optimal wavelengths from hyperspectral image data using joint skewness algorithm, so that they can be deployed in multispectral imaging-based inspection system for the automatic classification of maize seed. The hyperspectral images covering the wavelength range of 438～1 000 nm were acquired for 960 maize seeds including 10 varieties. After extracting the mean spectrum and entropy from the hyperspectral images, the joint skewness algorithm was used to select optimal wavelengths, and the classification models based on support vector machine were developed using the mean spectrum, entropy, and their combination, respectively. The experimental results indicated that the classification accuracy of the models developed by combination of the mean spectrum and entropy were higher than that of the mean spectrum or entropy for either full wavelengths or optimal wavelengths. The classification model for the combination of the mean spectrum and entropy based on the 10 optimal wavelengths selected by the joint skewness algorithm obtained 96.28% accuracy for test samples, with improvements of 4.30% and 20.38% over that of the mean spectrum and entropy, respectively, which was higher than the classification accuracy of the model that developed in the full wavelength (i.e., 93.47%). Meanwhile, the classification model based on joint skewness algorithm yielded the better classification accuracy than that of uninformative viable elimination algorithm, successive projections algorithm, and competitive adaptive reweighed sampling algorithm. This study made the online application of the hyperspectral image technology available for seed identification.
|
|
Received: 2016-02-26
Accepted: 2016-07-10
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
ZHU Qi-bing
E-mail: zhuqib@163.com
|
|
[1] Yang Yanli, Miao Changyun, Li Xianguo, et al. Optik, 2014, 125: 5803.
[2] Cheng Shuxi, Sun Wenwen, Zhang Chu, et al. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2014, 34(9): 2519.
[3] Alireza P, Hamidreza P, Mohammad A, et al. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2012, 83: 102.
[4] Mohammed K, Sun Da-wen, Gamal E, et al. Talanta, 2013, 103: 130.
[5] Teena M, Manickavasagan A, Ravikanth L, et al. Journal of Stored Products Research, 2014, 59: 306.
[6] Ramón M, Francesco C, Amaury L, et al. Neurocomputing, 2014, 128: 207.
[7] Tan Kezhu, Chai Yuhua, Song Weixian, et al. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2014, 30: 235.
[8] Wang Lu, Liu Dan, Pu Hongbin, et al. Food Analytical Methods, 2015, 8: 515.
[9] Hu Menghan, Dong QingLi, Liu BaoLin. Postharvest Biology & Technology, 2016, 115: 122.
[10] Adrianode A G, Agustina V S, Héctor C G, et al. Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 2015, 407: 5649.
[11] Fan Shuxiang, Zhang Baohua, Li Jiangbo, et al. Biosystems Engineering, 2016, 143: 9.
[12] Huang Min, Zhao Weiyan, Wang Qingguo, et al. International Agrophysics, 2015, 29: 39.
[13] Huang Min, Ma Yanan, Li Yanhua, et al. Analytical Methods, 2014, 6: 7793.
[14] Geng Xiurui, Ji Luyan, Sun Kang. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2014, 11: 1821.
[15] Geng Xiurui, Ji Luyan, Zhao Yongchao, et al. IEEE Geosci and Remote Sens. Lett., 2013, 10: 1305.
[16] Yang Xiaoling, Hong Hanmei, You Zhaohong, et al. Sensors, 2015, 15: 15578.
[17] Zhu Qibing, Feng Zhaoli, Huang Min, et al. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2012, 23: 271. |
| [1] |
BAO Hao1, 2，ZHANG Yan1, 2*. Research on Spectral Feature Band Selection Model Based on Improved Harris Hawk Optimization Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 148-157. |
| [2] |
YANG Guang1, JIN Chun-bai1, REN Chun-ying2*, LIU Wen-jing1, CHEN Qiang1. Research on Band Selection of Visual Attention Mechanism for Object
Detection[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 266-274. |
| [3] |
WANG Cai-ling1，ZHANG Jing1，WANG Hong-wei2*, SONG Xiao-nan1, JI Tong3. A Hyperspectral Image Classification Model Based on Band Clustering and Multi-Scale Structure Feature Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 258-265. |
| [4] |
GAO Hong-sheng1, GUO Zhi-qiang1*, ZENG Yun-liu2, DING Gang2, WANG Xiao-yao2, LI Li3. Early Classification and Detection of Kiwifruit Soft Rot Based on
Hyperspectral Image Band Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 241-249. |
| [5] |
CHENG Hui-zhu1, 2, YANG Wan-qi1, 2, LI Fu-sheng1, 2*, MA Qian1, 2, ZHAO Yan-chun1, 2. Genetic Algorithm Optimized BP Neural Network for Quantitative
Analysis of Soil Heavy Metals in XRF[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3742-3746. |
| [6] |
SHEN Si-cong, ZHANG Jing-xue, CHEN Ming-hui, LI Zhi-wei, SUN Sheng-nan, YAN Xue-bing*. Estimation of Above-Ground Biomass and Chlorophyll Content of
Different Alfalfa Varieties Based on UAV Multi-Spectrum[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3847-3852. |
| [7] |
BAI Xue-bing1, 2, SONG Chang-ze1, ZHANG Qian-wei1, DAI Bin-xiu1, JIN Guo-jie1, 2, LIU Wen-zheng1, TAO Yong-sheng1, 2*. Rapid and Nndestructive Dagnosis Mthod for Posphate Dficiency in “Cabernet Sauvignon” Gape Laves by Vis/NIR Sectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3719-3725. |
| [8] |
HUANG Zhao-di1, CHEN Zai-liang2, WANG Chen3, TIAN Peng2, ZHANG Hai-liang2, XIE Chao-yong2*, LIU Xue-mei4*. Comparing Different Multivariate Calibration Methods Analyses for Measurement of Soil Properties Using Visible and Short Wave-Near
Infrared Spectroscopy Combined With Machine Learning Algorithms[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3535-3540. |
| [9] |
LI Wen-wen1, 2, LONG Chang-jiang1, 2, 4*, LI Shan-jun1, 2, 3, 4, CHEN Hong1, 2, 4. Detection of Mixed Pesticide Residues of Prochloraz and Imazalil in
Citrus Epidermis by Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3052-3058. |
| [10] |
LIU Fei1, TAN Jia-jin1*, XIE Gu-ai2, SU Jun3, YE Jian-ren1. Early Diagnosis of Pine Wilt Disease Based on Hyperspectral Data and Needle Resistivity[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3280-3285. |
| [11] |
LI Yang1, LI Xiao-qi1, YANG Jia-ying1, SUN Li-juan2, CHEN Yuan-yuan1, YU Le1, WU Jing-zhu1*. Visualisation of Starch Distribution in Corn Seeds Based on Terahertz Time-Domain Spectral Reflection Imaging Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2722-2728. |
| [12] |
MA Qian1, 2, YANG Wan-qi1, 2, LI Fu-sheng1, 2*, CHENG Hui-zhu1, 2, ZHAO Yan-chun1, 2. Research on Classification of Heavy Metal Pb in Honeysuckle Based on XRF and Transfer Learning[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2729-2733. |
| [13] |
LÜ Shi-lei1, 2, 3, WANG Hong-wei1, LI Zhen1, 2, 3*, ZHOU Xu1, ZHAO Jing1. Hyperspectral Identification Model of Cantonese Tangerine Peel Based on BWO-SVM Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2894-2901. |
| [14] |
WANG Jun-jie1, YUAN Xi-ping2, 3, GAN Shu1, 2*, HU Lin1, ZHAO Hai-long1. Hyperspectral Identification Method of Typical Sedimentary Rocks in Lufeng Dinosaur Valley[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2855-2861. |
| [15] |
ZHANG Fu1, 2, WANG Xin-yue1, CUI Xia-hua1, YU Huang1, CAO Wei-hua1, ZHANG Ya-kun1, XIONG Ying3, FU San-ling4*. Identification of Maize Varieties by Hyperspectral Combined With Extreme Learning Machine[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2928-2934. |
|
|
|
|
