光谱学与光谱分析 |
|
|
|
|
|
Improving Analytical Methods by Uncertainty Evaluation with the Case of Determination of Aluminum in Starch Products by ICP-MS |
GAO Rui-feng1, 2, GAO Meng-chao3, LING Rui3, ZHANG Ning1* |
1. Department of Physics, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China 2. Nanjing Institute of Product Quality Inspection, Nanjing 210019, China 3. Nanjing Institute for Food and Drug Control, Nanjing 210038, China |
|
|
Abstract The measurement uncertainty is a non-negative parameter associated with the result of a measurement that characterizes the dispersion of the quantity values that could reasonably be attributed to the measurand. In the present study measurement uncertainty is estimated using the GUM (ISO/IEC Guide 98: 1993 Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement) bottom-up approach. The steps were followed: specifying the measurand; identifying all the associated sources of uncertainty; quantifying the uncertainty components; combining the uncertainty components; determining the extended combined standard uncertainty; reviewing the estimates and reporting the measurement uncertainty. In this process, the major uncertainty components with greater impact were identified; try to eliminate or to reduce the impact of these components can improve measurement methods. Examples were the determination of aluminum in starch and bread crumbs by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). The uncertainties of aluminum contents were from measurement repeatability, variability of calibration curve, standard stock solution, dilution, solution volume and sample weighing. The data indicated that the major contributions to the uncertainty budget originating from urel(cAl)1 (the relative standard uncertainty of aluminum content derived from linear least squares calibration), urel(cAl)3 (the relative standard uncertainty of aluminum content derived from the dilution of the standard stock solutions) and urel(rep) (the relative standard uncertainty derived from the repeatability). Based on the analysis of the main individual contributions of each uncertainty source to the total uncertainty value, several modifications were proposed. Firstly helium collision mode was replaced by no gas mode to improve the sensitivity of mass spectrometry. Secondly the number of measurements was increased. Thirdly let the mean of data points in the calibration closer the measurand. Finally the relative error smaller gauges were used. After these modifications, urel(cAl)1, urel(cAl)3 and urel(rep) were from (0.035 8, 0.013 2, 0.008 5) down to (0.006 0, 0.010 5, 0.003 3), respectively; the combined relative standard uncertainty of aluminum was from 0.039 down to 0.013; the expanded uncertainty from 1.8 down to 0.4 mg·kg-1(coverage factor k=2). The improvement effect was significant.
|
Received: 2015-01-13
Accepted: 2015-04-19
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
ZHANG Ning
E-mail: zhangning@njnu.edu.cn
|
|
[1] Evaluation of Measurement Data-Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement. JCGM 100, BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, OIML, 2008. [2] Ellison S L R, Williams A. Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement. EURACHEM/CITAC Guide CG 4, Third Edition, 2012. [3] ISO/IEC 17025, General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2005. [4] Maroto A, Boque R, Riu J, et al. Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 1999, 18: 577. [5] Moser J, Wegscheider W, Meisel T, et al. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2003, 377: 97. [6] Hund E, Massart D L, Smeyers-Verbeke J. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2003, 480: 39. [7] Luo Y, Gao S, Longerich H P, et al. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2007, 22: 122. [8] XING Li, WANG Mei, ZHAO Feng-min, et al(兴 丽, 王 梅, 赵凤敏, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2014, 34(1): 226. [9] Ekanem E J, Lori J A, Okibe F G, et al. Journal of Food Technology, 2009, 7(2): 50. [10] Bratakos S M, Lazou A E, Bratakos M S, et al. Food Additives and Contaminants: Part B Surveillance, 2012, 5(1): 33. [11] Beauchemin D. Analytical Chemistry, 2010, 82(12): 4786. [12] Llorent-Martinez E J, Fernandez de Cordova M L, Ruiz-Medina A, et al. Microchemical Journal, 2012, 102: 23. [13] Zhu Y B,Chiba K. Talanta, 2012, 90: 57. [14] Chudzinska M, Debska A,Baralkiewicz D. Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 2012, 17(1): 65. [15] Yenisoy-Karakas. Food Chemistry, 2012, 132: 1555. [16] Chen H, Fan C L, Wang Z B, et al. Analytical Methods, 2013, 5: 3291. [17] Tanase I G, Popa D E, Udristioiu G E, et al. RSC Advances, 2015, 5: 11445. |
[1] |
LIU Jia, ZHENG Ya-long, WANG Cheng-bo, YIN Zuo-wei*, PAN Shao-kui. Spectra Characterization of Diaspore-Sapphire From Hotan, Xinjiang[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 176-180. |
[2] |
LIU Pan1, 2, 3, DU Mi-fang1*, LI Bin1, LI Jing-bin1, ZENG Lei1, LIU Guo-yuan1, ZHANG Xin-yao1, 4, ZHA Xiao-qin1, 4. Determination of Trace Tellurium Content in Aluminium Alloy by
Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3125-3131. |
[3] |
ZHANG Zhi-fen1, LIU Zi-min1, QIN Rui1, LI Geng1, WEN Guang-rui1, HE Wei-feng2. Real-Time Detection of Protective Coating Damage During Laser Shock Peening Based on ReliefF Feature Weight Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2437-2445. |
[4] |
CHEN Chao-yang1, 2, LIU Cui-hong1, 2, LI Zhi-bin3, Andy Hsitien Shen1, 2*. Alexandrite Effect Origin of Gem Grade Diaspore[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2557-2562. |
[5] |
DING Kun-yan1, HE Chang-tao2, LIU Zhi-gang2*, XIAO Jing1, FENG Guo-ying1, ZHOU Kai-nan3, XIE Na3, HAN Jing-hua1. Research on Particulate Contamination Induced Laser Damage of Optical Material Based on Integrated Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(04): 1234-1241. |
[6] |
MAO Xiao-tian1, CHEN Chang2, YIN Zuo-wei1*, WANG Zi-min1. Spectra Characterization of Cr-Grossular (Tsavorite) With “Frogspawn” Color Zoning From Canada[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(02): 520-525. |
[7] |
HUANG Xing-zhong1, 2, WU Wen-fen1, LI Zhan-bing1, LI Hui-quan1, 2, LIU Qing-qing1, LI Shao-peng1*. Spectral Analysis of Fluoride and Nitride Phase in Secondary Aluminum Dross[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(11): 3588-3594. |
[8] |
GUO Xiao-hua1, ZHAO Peng1, WU Ya-qing1, TANG Xue-ping3, GENG Di2*, WENG Lian-jin2*. Application of XRF and ICP-MS in Elements Content Determinations of Tieguanyin of Anxi and Hua’an County, Fujian Province[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(10): 3124-3129. |
[9] |
ZHANG Fei1, 5,HUA Xia2*,YUAN Jia-ying3,YOU Fan1,YE Ren-cai4,DING Li4, ZHAO Jian-mei4. Determination of Thallium in Blood of Occupational Exposed Population by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry With High Matrix Introduction[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(09): 2870-2874. |
[10] |
HAN Bing1, SUN Dan-dan2*, WAN Wei-hao1, WANG Hui3, DONG Cai-chang2, ZHAO Lei3, WANG Hai-zhou3*. Element Segregation of Cast-Rolled 7B05 Aluminum Alloy Based on
Microbeam X-Ray Fluorescence[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(05): 1413-1419. |
[11] |
HU Li-hong1, ZHANG Jin-tong1, WANG Li-yun2, ZHOU Gang3, WANG Jiang-yong1*, XU Cong-kang1*. Optimization of Working Parameters of Glow Discharge Optical Emission Spectrometry of High Barrier Aluminum Plastic Film[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(03): 954-960. |
[12] |
WANG Zi-xiong, XU Da-peng*, ZHANG Yi-fan, LI Jia-jia. Research Progress of Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Detection Analyte Molecules[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(02): 341-349. |
[13] |
LI Ming-liang1, DAI Yu-jia1, QIN Shuang1, SONG Chao2*, GAO Xun1*, LIN Jing-quan1. Influence of LIBS Analysis Model on Quantitative Analysis Precision of Aluminum Alloy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(02): 587-591. |
[14] |
QIN Shuang1, LI Ming-liang1, DAI Yu-jia1, GAO Xun1*, SONG Chao2*, LIN Jing-quan1. The Accuracy Improvement of Fe Element in Aluminum Alloy by Millisecond Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Under Spatial Confinement Combined With Support Vector Machine[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(02): 582-586. |
[15] |
PENG Jian-wen1, XIAO Chong1, SONG Qiang1, PENG Zhong-chao1, HUANG Ruo-sen1, YANG Ya-dong3, TANG Gang1, 2, 3*. Flame Retardant Mechanism Investigation of Thermoplastic Polyurethane Composite/Ammonium Polyphosphate/Aluminum Hydroxide Composites Based on Spectroscopy Analysis[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(12): 3901-3908. |
|
|
|
|