中红外光谱和支持向量机的梅花鹿角帽粉假冒与掺假识别模型

doi:10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2022)08-2359-07

Abstract
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (3667 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Sika deer antler caps are of great medicinal and economic value. Because of its hard texture, the finished product is generally presented as powder. It is difficult for consumers to determine the authenticity of sika deer antler cap powder from its appearance, which leads to endless series of counterfeit and adulterated products. Therefore, this paper proposes a FTIR technology and machine learning method to identify counterfeited and adulterated sika deer antler cap powder. This method can identify counterfeited sika deer antler cap powder by horse stag deer antler cap powder, sika deer bone powder, and adulterated sika deer antler cap powder by beef bone powder. This research’s sika deer antler caps, stag deer antler caps and sika deer bones are from five regions of the three provinces of Heilongjiang, Jilin and Liaoning. The samples are divided into 360 portions, including 120 portions of sika deer antler caps, 120 portions of red deer antlers caps and 120 portions of sika deer bones. The beef bone powder is purchased in Changchun Nanguan District Farmers’ Market. Adulterate the beef bone powder into 120 portions of sika deer antlers powder with 5%, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50% for every 20 portions. Sample spectral data were collected by mid-infrared spectroscopy, preprocessed by multiple scattering correction (MSC), and sampled by the K-S method. After the training and test sets were divided by 2∶1, Normalization and principal component analysis (PCA) dimension reduction was conducted on spectral data. According to the principle of cumulative contribution rate of the number of principal components≥85% and principal component characteristic value≥1, the first 7 principal components were selected to form the spectral data after dimensionality reduction. The recognition models of support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF) and Extreme learning machine (ELM) were established by using full-spectrum (FS) data and PCA dimensional-reduction spectral data as model inputs. The results showed a difference between the authentic and counterfeit and adulterated products in the waveband of 1 300~1 800 and 2 800~3 600 cm^-1. The difference between the pure sika deer antler cap powder and sika deer antler cap powder of the adulteration rate ≥10% was the most obvious. FS-SVM, PCA-SVM and FS-RF models all have excellent recognition effects in identifying fake and adulterated sika deer antler hat powder. The recognition rate of the training and test set is 100%, and the recognition rate of other models is less than 98%. From the perspective of simplified models, the modeling time of FS-SVM and FS-RF is 4 859.36 and 1 818.96 s respectively, while the modeling time of PCA-SVM is only 19.91 s. Therefore, PCA-SVM has the best overall effect among the six recognition models. The research shows that the method based on mid-infrared spectroscopy combined with support vector machine modeling can be used as a fast, accurate and non-destructive identification method for counterfeiting and adulteration of sika deer antler cap powder.

Key words：Sika deer antler cap; Mid-infrared spectrum; Principal component analysis; Support vector machine; Random forest; Extreme learning machine

Received: 2021-06-17 Accepted: 2021-12-05

ZTFLH:

O433.4

Corresponding Authors: WU Hai-wei E-mail: haiwei@jlau.edu.cn

Cite this article:

YANG Cheng-en,WU Hai-wei,YANG Yu, et al. A Model for the Identification of Counterfeited and Adulterated Sika Deer Antler Cap Powder Based on Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy and Support Vector Machines[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(08): 2359-2365.

URL:

https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2022)08-2359-07 OR https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/Y2022/V42/I08/2359

[1] TANG Zhi-jia, HU Wei(唐智佳, 胡薇). Heilongjiang Animal Husbandry and Veterinary(黑龙江畜牧兽医) , 2018, (7): 17.
[2] PANG Jia-feng, TANG Chen, LI Yan-kun, et al(庞佳烽, 汤谌, 李艳坤，等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2020, 40(10): 3236.
[3] Bustamante M A, Nogues I, Jones S, et al. Scientific Reports, 2019, 9: 6489.
[4] LAN Wei-qing, ZHOU Da-peng, LIU Da-yong, et al(蓝蔚青, 周大鹏, 刘大勇, 等). Food and Fermentation Industries(食品与发酵工业), 2019, 45(17): 267.
[5] SUN Fei, CHEN Yu, WANG Kai-yang, et al(孙飞，陈雨，王凯洋，等). Journal of Beijing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine(北京中医药大学学报), 2019, 42(10): 862.
[6] ZHANG Jiu-xu, ZHAI Xiao-lin, WANG Dan, et al(张久旭, 翟小林, 王丹, 等). Modern Chinese Traditional Medicine(中国现代中药), 2018, 20(12): 1521.
[7] ZHENG Jie, RU Chen-lei, ZHANG Lu, et al(郑洁, 茹晨雷, 张璐, 等). China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica(中国中药杂志), 2021, 46(10): 2571.
[8] ZHANG Dong-yan, ZHOU Bao-long, ZHANG Rui, et al(张冬妍, 周宝龙, 张瑞, 等). Food Research and Development(食品研究与开发), 2021, 42(4): 176.
[9] YU Hai-ye, LI Xiao-kai, YU Yue, et al(于海业, 李晓凯, 于跃, 等). Journal of Jilin Agricultural University(吉林农业大学学报), 2021, 43(2): 155.
[10] PENG Yan-kun, ZHAO Fang, LI Long, et al(彭彦昆, 赵芳, 李龙, 等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2018, 34(5): 159.
[11] LIU Shuang-yin, HUANG Jian-de, XU Long-qin, et al(刘双印, 黄建德, 徐龙琴, 等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2020, 36(11): 225.
[12] BAI Qing-xu, HOU Ying, YANG Pan-pan, et al(白庆旭, 候英, 杨盼盼, 等). Journal of West China Forestry Science（西部林业科学), 2021, 50(3): 126.
[13] LI Pei-pei, LUAN Zhen-jie, LI Duo, et al(李佩佩, 栾真杰, 李朵, 等). Chinese Journal of Analysis Laboratory(分析试验室), 2020, 39(5): 550.
[14] ZHU Yong-chao, ZHU Cai-chao, SONG Chao-sheng, et al(朱永超, 朱才朝, 宋朝省, 等). Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica(太阳能学报), 2021, 42(3): 35.