|
|
|
|
|
|
| Intelligent Recognition of Corn Residue Cover Area by Time-Series
Sentinel-2A Images |
| TAO Wan-cheng1, 2, ZHANG Ying1, 2, XIE Zi-xuan1, 2, WANG Xin-sheng1, 2, DONG Yi1, 2, ZHANG Ming-zheng 1, 2, SU Wei1, 2*, LI Jia-yu1, 2, XUAN Fu1, 2 |
1. College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
2. Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing for Agri-Hazards, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100083, China
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract Crop residue covering is an important way to reduce soil erosion and increase soil organic carbon, which is very important for black soil protection. Therefore, the accurate and rapid identification of corn residue cover area plays an important role in local government monitoring and promoting conservation tillage. The study area is located in Siping City, Jilin Province. Moreover, the time-series Sentinel-2A images collected from GEE (Google Earth Engine) cloud platform are used to capture spectral index based on the characteristics of the corn growing season and after harvest. Index features include Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and Normalized Difference Residue Index (NDRI). The time series feature values are sorted by size, and the quantile method is used to select quartile (QT) features at 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% to construct datasets. On this basis, the random forest method after parameter optimization is applied to train and verify the sample datasets divided according to 7∶3, and then the datasets are classified, combined with the connected domain calibration method to remove the small connected domains generated in the classification process, and further optimize the global result. Through the quantitative and qualitative evaluation of Kappa and Overall Accuracy (OA), the experimental results show that: (1) The quantitative evaluation results of the classification model (M1/M2/M3/M4/M5) based on the dataset composed of the different feature are superior 90%. Among them, the classification model M5 of the dataset designed in this paper has the best performance, of which Kappa and OA are 97.41% and 97.91%, respectively. Compared with the classification model M2 without the QT feature, the Kappa and OA are increased by 4.52% and 3.64%, respectively. At the same time, the M5 recognition result can effectively retain edge detail information; (2) For QT feature of different time scales, using the QT feature classification model M5_6/M5 of time series remote sensing images from May to November can greatly restrain another crop residue. Compared with the Kappa and OA of the M5_1 model classification result using only the QT features of the time series images in November, the Kappa and OA increased by 3.9% and 3.12%, respectively; (3) Based on the M5 model, the Kappa and OA of the classification model M6 combined with the connected domain calibration method are 96.76% and 97.36%, respectively, second only to the recognition results of the M5 model. The model M6 avoids fine-grained patches while ensuring high accuracy and optimizing the classification visualization effect. Therefore, the M6 model proposed in this paper is suitable for identifying areas covered by corn residue in the study area. This method can be quickly implemented in the GEE cloud platform environment and is suitable for popularization and application in a corn residue covered areas in Northeast China.
|
|
Received: 2021-06-01
Accepted: 2021-08-01
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
SU Wei
E-mail: suwei@cau.edu.cn
|
|
[1] Daughtry C S T, Doraiswamy P C, Hunt Jr E R, et al. Soil and Tillage Research, 2006, 91(1-2): 101.
[2] Shen Y, McLaughlin N, Zhang X, et al. Scientific Reports, 2018, 8(1): 1.
[3] Du Z, Ren T, Hu C. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2010, 74(1): 196.
[4] Watts D B, Runion G B, Balkcom K S. Field Crops Research, 2017, 201: 184.
[5] Sindelar M, Blanco-Canqui H, Jin V L, et al. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2019, 83(1): 221.
[6] Jin X, Ma J, Wen Z, et al. Remote Sensing, 2015, 7(11): 14559.
[7] Mupangwa W, Thierfelder C, Cheesman S, et al. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 2020, 35(3): 322.
[8] Guan H X, Liu H J, Meng X T, et al. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12(19): 3149.
[9] Rodriguez-Galiano V F, Ghimire B, Rogan J, et al. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2012, 67: 93.
[10] Hu Y, Hu Y. Remote Sensing, 2019, 11(5): 554.
[11] Venkatappa M, Sasaki N, Shrestha R P, et al. Remote Sensing, 2019, 11(13): 1514.
[12] Gelder B K, Kaleita A L, Cruse R M. Agronomy Journal, 2009, 101(3): 635.
[13] Bao Y, Meng X, Ustin S, et al. Catena, 2020, 195: 104703.
[14] Du Z, Yang J, Ou C, et al. Remote Sensing, 2019, 11(7): 888.
|
| [1] |
LI Quan-lun1, CHEN Zheng-guang1*, SUN Xian-da2. Rapid Detection of Total Organic Carbon in Oil Shale Based on Near
Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(06): 1691-1697. |
| [2] |
LI Meng1, 2, ZHANG Xiao-bo2, LIU Shao-bo3, CHEN Xing-feng4*, HUANG Lu-qi5*, SHI Ting-ting2, YANG Rui6, LIU Shu7, ZHENG Feng-jie8. Partly Interpretable Machine Learning Method of Ginseng Geographical Origins Recognition and Analysis by Hyperspectral Measurements[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(04): 1217-1221. |
| [3] |
DUAN Wei-na1, 2, JING Xia1*, LIU Liang-yun2, ZHANG Teng1, ZHANG Li-hua3. Monitoring of Wheat Stripe Rust Based on Integration of SIF and Reflectance Spectrum[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(03): 859-865. |
| [4] |
CHEN Feng-xia1, YANG Tian-wei2, LI Jie-qing1, LIU Hong-gao3, FAN Mao-pan1*, WANG Yuan-zhong4*. Identification of Boletus Species Based on Discriminant Analysis of Partial Least Squares and Random Forest Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(02): 549-554. |
| [5] |
YE Rong-ke1, KONG Qing-chen1, LI Dao-liang1, 2, CHEN Ying-yi1, 2, ZHANG Yu-quan1, LIU Chun-hong1, 2*. Shrimp Freshness Detection Method Based on Broad Learning System[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(01): 164-169. |
| [6] |
LUO De-fang1, LIU Wei-yang1*, PENG Jie1, FENG Chun-hui1, JI Wen-jun2, BAI Zi-jin1. Field in Situ Spectral Inversion of Cotton Organic Matter Based on Soil Water Removal Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(01): 222-228. |
| [7] |
WU Ye-lan1, CHEN Yi-yu1, LIAN Xiao-qin1, LIAO Yu2, GAO Chao1, GUAN Hui-ning1, YU Chong-chong1. Study on the Identification Method of Citrus Leaves Based on Hyperspectral Imaging Technique[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(12): 3837-3843. |
| [8] |
LUO De-fang1, PENG Jie1*, FENG Chun-hui1, LIU Wei-yang1, JI Wen-jun2, WANG Nan3. Inversion of Soil Organic Matter Fraction in Southern Xinjiang by Visible-Near-Infrared and Mid-Infrared Spectra[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(10): 3069-3076. |
| [9] |
FANG Yuan, HE Zhang-ping, ZHU Shi-chao, LIANG Xian-rong, JIN Gang*. In-Line Identification of Different Grades of GPPS Based on Near-Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(09): 2759-2763. |
| [10] |
ZHANG Zi-han1, YAN Lei1,2, LIU Si-yuan1, FU Yu1, JIANG Kai-wen1, YANG Bin3, LIU Sui-hua4, ZHANG Fei-zhou1*. Leaf Nitrogen Concentration Retrieval Based on Polarization Reflectance Model and Random Forest Regression[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(09): 2911-2917. |
| [11] |
XU Lu*, WANG Hui, QIU Si-yi, LIAN Jing-wen, WANG Li-juan. Coastal Soil Salinity Estimation Based Digital Images and Color Space Conversion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(08): 2409-2414. |
| [12] |
YANG Si-jie1,2, FENG Wei-wei2,3,4*, CAI Zong-qi2,3, WANG Qing2,3. Study on Rapid Recognition of Marine Microplastics Based on Raman Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(08): 2469-2473. |
| [13] |
WANG Jiao-jiao1, 2, SONG Xiao-yu1*, MEI Xin2, YANG Gui-jun1*, LI Zhen-hai1, LI He-li1, MENG Yang1. Sensitive Bands Selection and Nitrogen Content Monitoring of Rice Based on Gaussian Regression Analysis[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(06): 1722-1729. |
| [14] |
LI Shuo1, LI Chun-lian1, CHEN Song-chao3, 4, XU Dong-yun2, SHI Zhou2*. Removing the Effects of Water From Visible-Near Infrared Spectra in Soil Profiles for the Estimation of Organic Carbon[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(04): 1234-1239. |
| [15] |
ZHAO Fan, YAN Zhao-ru, XUE Jian-xin, XU Bing. Identification of Wild Black and Cultivated Goji Berries by Hyperspectral Image[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(01): 201-205. |
|
|
|
|
