|
|
|
|
|
|
| Accurate Quantitative Analysis of Valuable Components in Zinc Leaching Residue Based on XRF and RBF Neural Network |
| LI Yuan1, 2, SHI Yao2*, LI Shao-yuan1*, HE Ming-xing3, ZHANG Chen-mu2, LI Qiang2, LI Hui-quan2, 4 |
1. Faculty of Metallurgical and Energy Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China
2. CAS Key Laboratory of Green Process and Engineering, National Engineering Laboratory for Hydrometallurgical Cleaner Production Technology, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
3. School of Information and Electrical Engineering, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan 056038, China
4. School of Chemical Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract Zinc smelting leaching slag is the solid smelting waste produced by the hydro-zinc smelting process, accounting for more than 75% of the total output of zinc smelting solid waste. Because it contains Zn, Cu, Pb, Ag, Cd, As and other valuable metals elements, it has great potential in resource utilization. However, due to its unstable composition content and insufficient detection accuracy, it is not easy to guarantee the resource conversion efficiency of key elements. Therefore, accurate quantitative analysis of the key resource components of the leaching residue is of great significance in the green development of zinc smelting. In this paper, five target elements of Zn, Cu, Pb, Cd, and As are the analysis objects，the method of XRF working curve and the method of XRF combined with RBF neural network model used to quantitatively analyze the target elements of the leaching residue. The relative error and Relative standard deviation are used as evaluation indicators of the two methods to compare the performance of the two methods. First, the concentration gradient samples of zinc leaching residue collected in the industrial field were prepared by standard addition method, used as standard sample and detected by ICP-OES. Then the detection result of ICP-OES is used as the reference value for the quantitative analysis of the target element, the concentration gradient sample is detected by X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (XRF), to establish the working curve of target elements, the working curve is used to analyze each target element quantitatively. At the same time, the XRF spectrum data is used to construct the input matrix, the target element concentration of the sample is used to construct an output matrix, and the RBF neural network is trained to construct the multi-element calibration model of the target element in the leaching residue. This model is used to realize the target element prediction of the leaching residue sample. Compared with the ICP-OES reference value, the average relative error and standard deviation of the working curve method are 8.5% and 4.0%, respectively; Compared with the ICP-OES benchmark value, the average relative error and standard deviation of the RBF neural network are 0.18% and 0.58%, respectively. The results show that both methods can achieve the quantitative analysis of target elements of the leach residue samples, but XRF combined with RBF neural network can achieve the accurate quantitative analysis and matrix correction of the leach residue samples. The accuracy and precision of the analysis results are better than the traditional working curve analysis methods.
|
|
Received: 2020-12-25
Accepted: 2021-04-28
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
SHI Yao
E-mail: yaoshi@ipe.ac.cn；lsy415808550@163.com
|
|
[1] CHU Ming, LI Cun-xiong, ZHANG Peng, et al(楚 铭, 李存兄, 张 鹏, 等). The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals(中国有色金属学报), 2020, 30(5): 1119.
[2] Sethurajan Manivannan, Huguenot David, Lens Piet N L, et al. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2016, 23(8)：75024.
[3] Melina Roshanfar, Misagh Khanlarian, Fereshteh Rashchi, et al. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 266: 2020. 121539.
[4] DING Yun-hu, MAO Zu-guo, HUANG Xing-lin, et al(丁运虎, 毛祖国, 黄兴林，等). Materials Protection(材料保护), 2016, 49(S1): 172.
[5] Seregina I F, Bolshov M A, Ossipov K. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy, 2021, 177：106050.
[6] Markiewicz B, Komorowicz I, Sajnóg A Belter, et al. Talanta, 2015, 132(15): 814.
[7] Niedzielski, Krueger, Brandherm. Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 2020, 35(13): 1455.
[8] Eglantina Merkaj, Nikolla Civici. Open Journal of Applied Sciences, 2020, 10(6): 305.
[9] Bell A M T, Backhouse D J, Deng W, et al. Minerals, 2020, 10(5): 442.
[10] ZHANG Hong-ju，ZHANG Ding-fei，YU Da-liang, et al(张红菊, 张丁非, 余大亮, 等). Chinese Journal of Analysis Laboratory(分析试验室), 2017, 36(2): 147.
[11] SUN Bao-lei, SUN Hao, ZHANG Chao-neng, et al(孙宝磊, 孙 暠, 张朝能, 等). Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae(环境科学学报), 2017, 37(5): 1864.
[12] JIANG Hong, MA Xiao, LI Fei, et al(姜 红, 马 枭, 李 飞, 等). Packaging Engineering(包装工程), 2021, 42(9): 5.
[13] LI Qiang, LIU Jian, LI Xiao-sui, et al(李 强, 刘 坚, 李小穗, 等). Rock and Mineral Analysis(岩矿测试), 2016, 35(5): 488.
[14] LI Ying-na, XU Zhi-bin(李颖娜, 徐志彬). Metallurgical Analysis(冶金分析), 2019, 39(1): 35.
|
| [1] |
WANG Yi-ya1, WANG Yi-min1*, GAO Xin-hua2. The Evaluation of Literature and Its Metrological Statistics of X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry Analysis in China[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(05): 1329-1338. |
| [2] |
JIANG Xiao-yu1, 2, LI Fu-sheng2*, WANG Qing-ya1, 2, LUO Jie3, HAO Jun1, 2, XU Mu-qiang1, 2. Determination of Lead and Arsenic in Soil Samples by X Fluorescence Spectrum Combined With CARS Variables Screening Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(05): 1535-1540. |
| [3] |
NI Zi-yue1, CHENG Da-wei2, LIU Ming-bo2, YUE Yuan-bo2, HU Xue-qiang2, CHEN Yu2, LI Xiao-jia1, 2*. The Detection of Mercury in Solutions After Thermal Desorption-
Enrichment by Energy Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(04): 1117-1121. |
| [4] |
CUI Ming-fang1, ZHU Jian-hua2*, HU Rui1, CHEN Shang-qian3. Research on the Chemical Composition and Process Feature of Ancient Porcelain Produced in Dongmendu Kiln[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(03): 726-731. |
| [5] |
YANG Jiong1, 2, QIU Zhi-li1, 4*, SUN Bo3, GU Xian-zi5, ZHANG Yue-feng1, GAO Ming-kui3, BAI Dong-zhou1, CHEN Ming-jia1. Nondestructive Testing and Origin Traceability of Serpentine Jade From Dawenkou Culture Based on p-FTIR and p-XRF[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(02): 446-453. |
| [6] |
JIANG Yan1, MAO Ling-lin3, WU Jun3, YANG Xi4, DAI Lu-lu1, YANG Ming-xing1, 2*. Scientific Analysis of Five Turquoise Beads Unearthed From Haochuan Cemetery in Suichang, Zhejiang[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(02): 568-574. |
| [7] |
WANG Xue-yuan1, 2, 3, HE Jian-feng1, 2, 3*, NIE Feng-jun2, YUAN Zhao-lin1, 2, 3, LIU Lin1, 2, 3. Decomposition of X-Ray Fluorescence Overlapping Peaks Based on Quantum Genetic Algorithm With Multi-Fitness Function[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(01): 152-157. |
| [8] |
LIU Ji-fu1, YANG Ming-xing1*, SU Yue1, LIU Yue2. Analysis of Material and Source of Archaic Jade From the Tomb of Marquis Yi of Zeng in Suizhou, Hubei Province[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(01): 215-221. |
| [9] |
JIA Wen-bao1, TANG Xin-ru1, ZHANG Xin-lei1, SHAO Jin-fa2, XIONG Gen-chao1, LING Yong-sheng1, HEI Dai-qian3, SHAN Qing1*. Study on Sample Preparation Method of Plant Powder Samples for Total Reflection X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(12): 3815-3821. |
| [10] |
PENG Ya1，2, LI Dong-ling2，3*, WAN Wei-hao1，2, ZHOU Qing-qing3，4, CAI Wen-yi1，2, LI Fu-lin1, LIU Qing-bin2，3, WANG Hai-zhou2，3. Analysis of Composition Distribution of New Cast-Forging FGH4096 Alloy Turbine Disk Based on Microbeam X-Ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(11): 3498-3505. |
| [11] |
YUE Su-wei1, 2, YAN Xiao-xu1, 2*, LIN Jia-qi1, WANG Pei-lian1, 2, LIU Jun-feng3. Spectroscopic Characteristics and Coloring Mechanism of Brown Tourmaline Under Heating Treatment[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(08): 2524-2529. |
| [12] |
WU Lian-hui1, 2, 3, HE Jian-feng1, 2, 3*, ZHOU Shi-rong2, 3, WANG Xue-yuan1, 2, YE Zhi-xiang2, 3. A Multi-Derivation-Spline Wavelet Analysis Method for Low Atomic Number Element EDXRF[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(08): 2530-2535. |
| [13] |
BO Wei, LI Xiao-li*, DU Xue-miao, LIU Bin, ZHANG Qin, BAI Jin-feng. Investigation of a High-Pressure Pressed Powder Pellet Covered With Polyester Film Technique for the Determination of Chlorine in Soil and Sediment by X-Ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(06): 1828-1833. |
| [14] |
LUO Li-qiang, SHEN Ya-ting. Advantages of X-Ray Spectrometry in Origin of Life, Earth Life on Earth and Global Climate Change[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(03): 665-674. |
| [15] |
SHUAI Qi-lin1, LIU Jun1, SHAO Jin-fa1, JIANG Qi-li1, LI Rong-wu2,3, PAN Qiu-li1,2,3, CHENG Lin1,3*. The Development and Its Applications of a Software Fitting Micro-X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrum Focused by Poly-Capillary Optics[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(03): 714-719. |
|
|
|
|
