|
|
|
|
|
|
| Determination of Lead and Arsenic in Soil Samples by X Fluorescence Spectrum Combined With CARS Variables Screening Method |
| JIANG Xiao-yu1, 2, LI Fu-sheng2*, WANG Qing-ya1, 2, LUO Jie3, HAO Jun1, 2, XU Mu-qiang1, 2 |
1. Engineering Research Center of Nuclear Technology Application, Ministry of Education, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China
2. State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Resources and Environment, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China
3. Yangtze University，Wuhan 430000, China
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract As a quantitative analysis technique based on stoichiometry, X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy is very important to the prediction accuracy of the results. The competitive adaptive reweighted algorithm (CARS) adopted adaptive reweighted sampling technology and used interactive verification to select the lowest value square error (RMSECV) by interactive verification to find out the optimal combination of variables. To further improving the interpretation and prediction ability of PLS models, the competitive adaptive reweighted algorithm (CARS) was combined with X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy. A partial least square (PLS) model was established after screening the characteristic wavelength variables of lead and arsenic in the soil. Firstly, the CARS algorithm screened the wavelength variables closely related to lead content. When the sampling times were 26 times, 60 effective wavelength points were selected, and the wavelength variables closely related to arsenic content were screened. When the sampling times were 34 times, 19 effective wavelength points were selected. Then used the PLS method to establish the quantitative analysis model of lead and arsenic content in soil and compared it with the PLS model established by continuous projection algorithm (SPA) and Monte Carlo method. The results showed that the prediction sets Determination Coefficient (R2), Root Mean Square Error of Cross-Validation (RMSECV), Root Mean Square Error of Prediction (RMSEP) and Relative Prediction Deviation (RPD) of the lead CARS-PLS model were 0.995 5, 2.598 6, 3.228 and 9.401 1, respectively. Moreover, the prediction sets R2, RMSECV, RMSEP and RPD of arsenic CARS-PLS models were 0.999, 3.013 2, 2.737 1 and 8.211 6, respectively. The CARS-PLS model performance of the two elements is better than that of full-band PLS, SPA-PLS and MC-UVE-PLS model. The CARS-PLS algorithm based on the X fluorescence spectrum can effectively screen the characteristic wavelength, simplify the complexity of modeling, and improve the accuracy and robustness of the model.
|
|
Received: 2021-03-17
Accepted: 2021-06-06
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
LI Fu-sheng
E-mail: lifusheng@ecit.cn
|
|
[1] WEN Zhen-cai, SUN Tong, XU Peng, et al(温珍才, 孙 通, 许 朋，等). Journal of Jiangsu University·Natural Science Edition(江苏大学学报·自然科学版), 2015, 36(6): 673.
[2] REN Shun, ZHANG Xiong, REN Dong, et al(任 顺, 张 雄, 任 东，等). J. Instrum. Anal.(分析测试学报), 2020, 39(7): 829.
[3] BIN Jun, FAN Wei, ZHOU Ji-heng, et al(宾 俊, 范 伟, 周冀衡, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2017, 37(1): 95.
[4] WU Xin-yan, BIAN Xi-hui, YANG Sheng, et al(武新燕, 卞希慧, 杨 盛，等). J. Instrum. Anal.(分析测试学报), 2020, 39(10): 1288.
[5] YU Lei, ZHU Ya-xing, HONG Yong-sheng，et al(于 雷, 朱亚星, 洪永胜，等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2016, 32(22): 138.
[6] JIANG Wei, FANG Jun-long, WANG Shu-wen, et al(姜 微, 房俊龙, 王树文，等). Journal of Northeast Agricultural University(东北农业大学学报), 2016, 47(2): 88.
[7] Li H D, Liang Y Z, Xu Q S, et al. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2009, 648: 77.
[8] Liang Y Z, Chen S, Zhang Z M. The Analyst, 2010, 135(5): 1138.
[9] Kennard R W, Stone L A. Technometrics, 1969, 11(1): 137.
[10] Centner V, Massart D L, de Noord O E, et al. Analytical Chemistry, 1996, 68(21): 3851.
[11] Araujo M C U, Saldanha T C B, Galvo R K H. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2001, 57(2): 65.
[12] Galvao R K H, Araujo M C U, Fragoso W D. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2008, 92(1): 83. |
| [1] |
HAN Xue1, 2, LIU Hai1, 2, LIU Jia-wei3, WU Ming-kai1, 2*. Rapid Identification of Inorganic Elements in Understory Soils in
Different Regions of Guizhou Province by X-Ray
Fluorescence Spectrometry[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 225-229. |
| [2] |
CHENG Hui-zhu1, 2, YANG Wan-qi1, 2, LI Fu-sheng1, 2*, MA Qian1, 2, ZHAO Yan-chun1, 2. Genetic Algorithm Optimized BP Neural Network for Quantitative
Analysis of Soil Heavy Metals in XRF[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3742-3746. |
| [3] |
LI Xiao-li1, WANG Yi-min2*, DENG Sai-wen2, WANG Yi-ya2, LI Song2, BAI Jin-feng1. Application of X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry in Geological and
Mineral Analysis for 60 Years[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 2989-2998. |
| [4] |
ZHOU Qing-qing1, LI Dong-ling1, 2, JIANG Li-wu1, 3*, WAN Wei-hao1, ZENG Qiang4, XUE Xin4, WANG Hai-zhou1, 2*. Quantitative Statistical Study on Dendritic Component Distribution of Single Crystal Blade Based on Microbeam X-Ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(07): 2112-2118. |
| [5] |
DU Zhi-heng1, 2, 3, HE Jian-feng1, 2, 3*, LI Wei-dong1, 2, 3, WANG Xue-yuan1, 2, 3, YE Zhi-xiang1, 2, 3, WANG Wen1, 2, 3. A New EDXRF Spectral Decomposition Method for Sharpening Error Wavelets[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(06): 1719-1724. |
| [6] |
LIN Jing-tao, XIN Chen-xing, LI Yan*. Spectral Characteristics of “Trapiche-Like Sapphire” From ChangLe, Shandong Province[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(04): 1199-1204. |
| [7] |
WU Lei1, LI Ling-yun2, PENG Yong-zhen1*. Rapid Determination of Trace Elements in Water by Total Reflection
X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry Using Direct Sampling[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(03): 990-996. |
| [8] |
ZHAO Ting-ting1, 3, WANG Ke-jian1, 3*, SI Yong-sheng1, 3, SHU Ying2, HE Zhen-xue1, 3, WANG Chao1, 3, ZHANG Zhi-sheng2*. Freshness Detection of Lamb Based on AW-OPS Hyperspectral
Wavelength Selection Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(03): 830-837. |
| [9] |
XU Wei-xuan1, CHEN Wen-bin2, 3*. Determination of Barium in Purple Clay Products for Food Contact by
Energy Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(02): 475-483. |
| [10] |
CHEN Ji-wen, YANG Zhen, ZHANG Shuai, CUI En-di, LI Ming*. Fast Resolution Algorithm for Overlapping Peaks Based on Multi-Peak Synergy and Pure Element Characteristic Peak Area Normalization[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(01): 151-155. |
| [11] |
JIA Wen-bao1, LI Jun1, ZHANG Xin-lei1, YANG Xiao-yan2, SHAO Jin-fa3, CHEN Qi-yan1, SHAN Qing1*LING Yong-sheng1, HEI Da-qian4. Study on Sample Preparation Method of Plant Powder Samples for Total Reflection X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(01): 169-174. |
| [12] |
TANG Ju1, 2, DAI Zi-yun2*, LI Xin-yu2, SUN Zheng-hai1*. Investigation and Research on the Characteristics of Heavy Metal Pollution in Children’s Sandpits Based on XRF Detection[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(12): 3879-3882. |
| [13] |
GUO Xiao-hua1, ZHAO Peng1, WU Ya-qing1, TANG Xue-ping3, GENG Di2*, WENG Lian-jin2*. Application of XRF and ICP-MS in Elements Content Determinations of Tieguanyin of Anxi and Hua’an County, Fujian Province[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(10): 3124-3129. |
| [14] |
WANG Yi-ya1, WANG Yi-min1*, GAO Xin-hua2. The Evaluation of Literature and Its Metrological Statistics of X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry Analysis in China[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(05): 1329-1338. |
| [15] |
NI Zi-yue1, CHENG Da-wei2, LIU Ming-bo2, YUE Yuan-bo2, HU Xue-qiang2, CHEN Yu2, LI Xiao-jia1, 2*. The Detection of Mercury in Solutions After Thermal Desorption-
Enrichment by Energy Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(04): 1117-1121. |
|
|
|
|
