|
|
|
|
|
|
Quantitative Analysis of TOC in Water Quality Based on UV-Vis Spectroscopy |
LI Qing-bo1, WEI Yuan1, CUI Hou-xin2, FENG Hao2, LANG Jia-ye2 |
1. Key Laboratory of Precision Opto-Mechatronics Technology, Ministry of Education, School of Instrumentation and Optoelectronic Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
2. Hebei Sailhero Environmental Protection Hi-Tech Co., Ltd., Shijiazhuang 050035, China
|
|
|
Abstract The safety of surface water resources is of great strategic significance. It is related to national health, ecological environment stability and sustainable economic development. Total organic carbon (TOC) is a comprehensive index to reflect the content of organic matter in water. Hence, it has significant value in water environment supervision and treatment. This method is time-consuming and complex. UV-Vis spectroscopy technology has the advantages of fast detection speed and simple operation. Therefore it has a good application prospect in online detection of water quality. At present, the online detection methods of TOC in surface water mostly are indirectly calculated at home and abroad. These methods depend on the correlation between the concentration of COD and TOC, and they require high stability of water composition. Compared with the indirect calculation methods, the spectral quantitative analysis method has better robustness and accuracy. Moreover, this method is convenient for realizing unattended online monitoring of water quality. The experiment was equipped with TOC sample solutions, and a two-day experiment was designed. Six spectral data sets of the samples (denoted as D1, D2, …, D6) were collected in 4 time periods. Firstly, D1 was used as the training set to establish a partial least squares (PLS) regression model in the group experiment. This model was used to predict the TOC concentration of D2, and the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) was less than 0.78%. In addition, D1 and D2 were collected in the same period. The results show that the established TOC quantitative analysis model has high accuracy. Then, to verify the robustness of the TOC model established by the PLS method to the change of instrument state, the spectral data collected in different periods were selected as the training set, the test set and the validation set. Furthermore, the cross experiments of different instrument states were performed. The MAPE of the predicted TOC concentration in the four experiments were 3.82%, 3.75%, 3.43% and 0.98%, respectively. The results show that the UV-Vis spectroscopy quantitative analysis model of TOC established by the PLS algorithm has good accuracy and robustness. The MAPE of predicted concentration in the grouping experiment and cross experiments of different instrument states are all less than 3.82%. These results are better than the conventional indirect calculation method. Moreover, the established spectral quantitative analysis model does not depend on the calculation relationship between COD and TOC. Thus, it has better adaptability than the conventional indirect calculation method when the water environment changes. Finally, the PLS algorithm has the advantages of a simple modeling process and fast operation speed. It provides convenience for the development and maintenance of submersible online detection equipment.
|
Received: 2021-01-19
Accepted: 2021-04-10
|
|
|
[1] National Standard of the People’s Republic of China(中华人民共和国国家标准). GB/T 32116—2015, Determination of Total Organic Carbon (TOC) in Industrial Circulating Cooling Water[循环冷却水中总有机碳(TOC)的测定]. Beijing: Standardization Administration of the P. R. C. (北京: 国家标准化管理委员会), 2015.
[2] ZHAO You-quan, LI Xia, LIU Xiao, et al(赵友全, 李 霞, 刘 潇,等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2016, 36(11): 3592.
[3] Lepot M, Torres A, Hofer T, et al. Water Research, 2016, 101: 519.
[4] Carré E, Pérot J, Jauzein V, et al. Water Science and Technology, 2017, 76(3): 633.
[5] Lee J, Lee S, Yu S, et al. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2016, 188(4): 252.
[6] Wu X, Tong R, Wang Y, et al. Sensors, 2019, 19(9): 2153.
[7] Guo Y, Liu C, Ye R, et al. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10(19): 6874.
[8] Galvao R K H, Araujo M C U, José G E, et al. Talanta, 2005, 67(4): 736.
|
[1] |
LUO Heng, Andy Hsitien Shen*. Based on Color Calculation and In-Situ Element Analyze to Study the Color Origin of Purple Chalcedony[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(06): 1891-1898. |
[2] |
JIANG Qing-hu1, LIU Feng1, YU Dong-yue2, 3, LUO Hui2, 3, LIANG Qiong3*, ZHANG Yan-jun3*. Rapid Measurement of the Pharmacological Active Constituents in Herba Epimedii Using Hyperspectral Analysis Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(05): 1445-1450. |
[3] |
FAN Nai-yun, LIU Gui-shan*, ZHANG Jing-jing, YUAN Rui-rui, SUN You-rui, LI Yue. Rapid Determination of TBARS Contents in Tan Mutton Using Hyperspectral Imaging[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(03): 713-718. |
[4] |
LU Qi-peng1, WANG Dong-min2*, SONG Yuan1*, DING Hai-quan3, GAO Hong-zhi3. Effect of Wavelength Drift on PLSR Calibration Model of Near-Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(02): 405-409. |
[5] |
JIANG Jie1, YU Quan-zhou1, 2, 3*, LIANG Tian-quan1, 2, TANG Qing-xin1, 2, 3, ZHANG Ying-hao1, 3, ZHANG Huai-zhen1, 2, 3. Analysis of Spectral Characteristics of Different Wetland Landscapes Based on EO-1 Hyperion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(02): 517-523. |
[6] |
LI Ming-liang1, DAI Yu-jia1, QIN Shuang1, SONG Chao2*, GAO Xun1*, LIN Jing-quan1. Influence of LIBS Analysis Model on Quantitative Analysis Precision of Aluminum Alloy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(02): 587-591. |
[7] |
ZHAO Yu-hui, LU Peng-cheng, LUO Yu-bo, SHAN Peng. NIR Calibration Transfer Method Based on Minimizing Mean Distribution Discrepancy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(10): 3051-3057. |
[8] |
LI Zhi-yuan1,2, DENG Fan1*, HE Jun-liang2, WEI Wei1. Hyperspectral Estimation Model of Heavy Metal Arsenic in Soil[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(09): 2872-2878. |
[9] |
YUE Su-wei1, 2, YAN Xiao-xu1, 2*, LIN Jia-qi1, WANG Pei-lian1, 2, LIU Jun-feng3. Spectroscopic Characteristics and Coloring Mechanism of Brown Tourmaline Under Heating Treatment[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(08): 2524-2529. |
[10] |
BAI Xue-bing1, LI Xin-xing1, ZHANG Xiao-shuan2, LUO Hai-ling3, FU Ze-tian2*. Quantitative Detection of Mutton Hardness Based on Twice Iterative Monte Carlo Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(07): 2057-2063. |
[11] |
ZHANG Jia-lin, ZHANG Qian, PEI Jing-cheng*, HUANG Wei-zhi. Gemological and Spectroscopy Characteristics of Synthetic Blue-Green Beryl by Hydrothermal Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(07): 2258-2262. |
[12] |
LIU Yang1, 2, 3, SUN Qian1, 3, FENG Hai-kuan1, 3*, YANG Fu-qin4. Estimation of Above-Ground Biomass of Potato Based on Wavelet Analysis[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(04): 1205-1212. |
[13] |
CHEN Yan-jie1,2, CUI Yu-qian1, LI Qing-song2*, LI Bo-qiang2, 3, WANG Ji-ping2, CHEN Guo-yuan2, LIAO Jie2, LI Guo-xin2. Characterization and Analysis of DOM in Raw Water in Xiamen and Zhangzhou by 3-DEEM-FRI[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(02): 499-504. |
[14] |
QI Wei, FENG Peng*, WEI Biao, ZHENG Dong, YU Ting-ting, LIU Peng-yong. Feature Wavelength Optimization Algorithm for Water Quality COD Detection Based on Embedded Particle Swarm Optimization-Genetic Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(01): 194-200. |
[15] |
WENG Hai-yong1, HUANG Jun-kun1, WAN Liang2, YE Da-peng1*. Rapidly Detecting Chlorophyll Content in Oilseed Rape Based on Spectral Reconstruction and Its Device Development[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(01): 210-215. |
|
|
|
|