|
|
|
|
|
|
Research on Selection Method of LIBS Feature Variables Based on CART Regression Tree |
YOU Wen1, XIA Yang-peng1, HUANG Yu-tao1, LIN Jing-jun2*, LIN Xiao-mei3* |
1. Department of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, Changchun University of Technology, Changchun 130012, China
2. Department of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Changchun University of Technology, Changchun 130012, China
3. Jilin University of Architecture and Technology,Changchun 130012, China |
|
|
Abstract When laser induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) is used for detection, due to the many and complex spectral lines, there are much redundant information, which will affect the quantitative analysis. Therefore, extracting effective feature variables is of great significance in the quantitative analysis of LIBS. In this paper, the method of selecting the spectral characteristics of the Ca element in the CaCl2 solution was analyzed, and the accuracy and stability of the univariate model, partial least square regression and CART regression tree calibration model were compared. In view of the large volatility of the surface of the water body, the poor spectral stability, and the fact that the spectrum is affected by the matrix effect and the self-absorption effect, the fitting coefficient (R2) obtained by the univariate model is only 0.933 2, and the training root mean square error (RMSEC), prediction root mean square error (RMSEP) and average relative error (ARE) are 0.019 2 Wt%, 0.017 7 Wt% and 11.604% respectively. After partial least squares regression optimization, the model R2 is increased to 0.975 3, and RMSEC, RMSEP and ARE are reduced to 0.010 8 Wt%, 0.013 Wt% and 7.49%, respectively. Although the model’s accuracy has been improved, it is still difficult to meet the analysis requirements. In order to further improve the accuracy of quantitative analysis, a CART regression tree calibration model was established. When constructing the tree model, this method uses the square error minimization criterion to select the optimal combination of characteristic variables from the complex spectral information to make classification decisions, thereby establishing the calibration curve of the Ca element. Through the variable selection of the CART regression tree, the number of characteristic variables is reduced from 100 to 6, and the compression rate of variables reaches 94%, which significantly reduces the interference of irrelevant spectral lines. The correlation coefficients of the regression tree model are R2, RMSEC, RMSEP and ARE is 0.997 5, 0.003 5 Wt%, 0.006 1 Wt% and 2.500%, respectively. Compared with the traditional univariate and partial least square regression, the CART regression tree model has higher accuracy and lower error. Through effective screening of characteristic variables, this paper eliminates the interference of irrelevant signals, significantly reduces the influence of matrix effect and self-absorption effect on LIBS quantitative analysis, and improves the accuracy and stability of quantitative analysis.
|
Received: 2020-10-10
Accepted: 2021-02-04
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
LIN Jing-jun, LIN Xiao-mei
E-mail: 1124270941@qq.com;187049860@qq.com
|
|
[1] Guo L B, Zhu Z H, Li J M, et al. Optics Express, 2018, 26(3): 2634.
[2] YANG Ming-qing, WANG Chao, YAN Zhi-quan(杨明清, 王 超, 阎治全). China Petroleum Exploration(中国石油勘探), 2018, 23(1): 117.
[3] GUO Jin-jia, LU Yuan, et al(郭金家, 卢 渊, 等). Journal of Atmospheric and Environmental Optics(大气与环境光学学报), 2020, 15(1): 13.
[4] Shin Sungho, Moon Youngmin, Lee Jaepil. Plasma Science and Technology, 2019, 21(3): 34011.
[5] YANG You-sheng, ZHANG Yan, et al(杨友盛, 张 岩, 等). Laser & Optoelectronics Progress(激光与光电子学进展), 2015, 52(5): 053001.
[6] ZHANG Lei, WANG Zhe, DING Hong-bin, et al(张 磊, 王 哲, 丁洪斌,等). Journal of Atmospheric and Environmental Optics(大气与环境光学学报), 2016, 11(5): 338.
[7] XIN Yong, LI Yang, CAI Zhen-rong, et al(辛 勇, 李 洋, 蔡振荣, 等). Metallurgical Analysis(冶金分析), 2019, 39(1): 15.
[8] Bilge G, Sezer B, Boyaci I H, et al. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy, 2018, 145: 115.
[9] Jun H M, Kim J H, Lee S H, et al. Energy, 2018, 160: 225.
[10] ZHANG Le-hao, ZHANG Li, WU Zhong-chen, et al(张乐豪, 张 立, 武中臣, 等). Acta Photonica Sinica(光子学报), 2020,(6): 0630002.
[11] WU Yi-qing, SUN Tong, LIU Jin, et al(吴宜青, 孙 通, 刘 津, 等). Laser & Optoelectronics Progress(激光与光电子学进展), 2018, 55(1): 013005.
[12] HU Li, ZHAO Nan-jing, et al(胡 丽, 赵南京, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2017, 37(8): 2585.
[13] GUO Kai-chen, WU Zhong-chen, ZHU Xiang-ping, et al(郭恺琛, 武中臣, 朱香平, 等). Acta Photonica Sinica(光子学报), 2019, 48(10): 1030002.
[14] Sun Chen, Tian Ye, Gao Liang, et al. Scientific Reports, 2019, 9(1): 11363.
[15] Ma F, et al. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2020, 35: 478. |
[1] |
WANG Gan-lin1, LIU Qian1, LI Ding-ming1, YANG Su-liang1*, TIAN Guo-xin1, 2*. Quantitative Analysis of NO-3,SO2-4,ClO-4 With Water as Internal Standard by Raman Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(06): 1855-1861. |
[2] |
ZHANG Xing-long1, LIU Yu-zhu1, 2*, SUN Zhong-mou1, ZHANG Qi-hang1, CHEN Yu1, MAYALIYA·Abulimiti3*. Online Monitoring of Pesticides Based on Laser Induced Breakdown
Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(06): 1711-1715. |
[3] |
YU Zhi-rong, HONG Ming-jian*. Near-Infrared Spectral Quantitative Analysis Network Based on Grouped Fully Connection[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(06): 1735-1740. |
[4] |
YANG Lin-yu1, 2, 3, DING Yu1, 2, 3*, ZHAN Ye4, ZHU Shao-nong1, 2, 3, CHEN Yu-juan1, 2, 3, DENG Fan1, 2, 3, ZHAO Xing-qiang1, 2, 3. Quantitative Analysis of Mn and Ni Elements in Steel Based on LIBS and GA-PLS[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(06): 1804-1808. |
[5] |
HE Ya-xiong1, 2, ZHOU Wen-qi1, 2, ZHUANG Bin1, 2, ZHANG Yong-sheng1, 2, KE Chuan3, XU Tao1, 2*, ZHAO Yong1, 2, 3. Study on Time-Resolved Characteristics of Laser-Induced Argon Plasma[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(04): 1049-1057. |
[6] |
ZHOU Jun1, 2, YANG Yang2, YAO Yao2, LI Zi-wen3, WANG Jian3, HOU Chang-jun1*. Application of Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy in the Analysis of Key Indexes of Strong Flavour Chinese Spirits Base Liquor[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(03): 764-768. |
[7] |
LI Yuan1, 2, SHI Yao2*, LI Shao-yuan1*, HE Ming-xing3, ZHANG Chen-mu2, LI Qiang2, LI Hui-quan2, 4. Accurate Quantitative Analysis of Valuable Components in Zinc Leaching Residue Based on XRF and RBF Neural Network[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(02): 490-497. |
[8] |
LI Ming-liang1, DAI Yu-jia1, QIN Shuang1, SONG Chao2*, GAO Xun1*, LIN Jing-quan1. Influence of LIBS Analysis Model on Quantitative Analysis Precision of Aluminum Alloy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(02): 587-591. |
[9] |
GONG Zheng1, LIN Jing-jun2*, LIN Xiao-mei3*, HUANG Yu-tao1. Effect of Heating and Cooling on the Characteristic Lines of Al During Melting[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(02): 598-602. |
[10] |
QIN Shuang1, LI Ming-liang1, DAI Yu-jia1, GAO Xun1*, SONG Chao2*, LIN Jing-quan1. The Accuracy Improvement of Fe Element in Aluminum Alloy by Millisecond Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Under Spatial Confinement Combined With Support Vector Machine[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(02): 582-586. |
[11] |
WANG Ya-wen1,2,3, ZHANG Yong4, CHEN Xiong-fei1,2,3, LIU Ying1,2,3, ZHAO Zhen-yang4, YE Ming-guo5, XU Yu-xing6, LIU Peng-yu1,2,3*. Quantitative Analysis of Nickel-Based Superalloys Based on a Remote LIBS System[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(02): 603-608. |
[12] |
FU Juan, MO Jia-mei, YU Yi-song, ZHANG Qing-zong, CHEN Xiao-li, CHEN Pei-li, ZHANG Shao-hong, SU Qiu-cheng*. Experimental Study on the Structure Characteristics of CO2 in Gas Hydrate by Solid-State Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and Raman Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(02): 464-469. |
[13] |
YU Feng-ping1, LIN Jing-jun1*, LIN Xiao-mei1, 3*, LI Lei1,2*. Detection of C Element in Alloy Steel by Double Pulse Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy With a Multivariable GA-BP-ANN[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(01): 197-202. |
[14] |
WANG Xiao-bin1, 2, 3, ZHANG Xi1, GUAN Chen-zhi1, HONG Hua-xiu1, HUANG Shuang-gen2*, ZHAO Chun-jiang3. Quantitative Detection of Ascorbic Acid Additive in Flour Based on Raman Imaging Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(12): 3765-3770. |
[15] |
LIU Jia-cheng1, 2, HU Bing-liang1, YU Tao1*, WANG Xue-ji1, DU Jian1, LIU Hong1, LIU Xiao1, HUANG Qi-xing3. Nonlinear Full-Spectrum Quantitative Analysis Algorithm of Complex Water Based on IERT[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(12): 3922-3930. |
|
|
|
|