|
|
|
|
|
|
| Study on Soil Salinity Estimation Method of “Moisture Resistance” Using Visible-Near Infrared Spectroscopy in Coastal Region |
| YANG Han, CAO Jian-fei*, WANG Zhao-hai*, WU Quan-yuan |
| College of Geography and Environment, Shandong Normal University, Ji’nan 250014, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Rapid and accurate monitoring of soil salinity in the coastal regions are of great significance to the rational use and protection of land. Visible-near infrared spectroscopy has been widely used for the efficient estimation of soil properties. However, the interference of soil moisture on the spectrum decreases the estimation accuracy of traditional soil salinity estimation models. This paper aimed to explore the capacity of piecewise direct standardization (PDS) and orthogonal signal correction (OSC) in estimating the soil salt content under the condition of moisture interferedand establishing “moisture resistance” Vis-NIR models in the coastal saline regions. To this end, 114 soil samples were collected from the Yellow River Delta (0~20 cm) and divided the data into a modeling dataset (17 samples) and a validation dataset (127 samples). A control rewetting process obtained the soil spectral of the modeling dataset with 10 moisture content levels (0%，1%，5%，10%，15%，20%，25%，30%，40% and 50%). The soil spectral of the validation dataset was measured after a fully randomized trial, according to the generated 1~50 random integer. The modeling strategy combining PDS and OSC with partial least squares regression (PLSR) was proposed to build soil salinity estimation models. These models were validated and compared. Results showed that OSC was more effective than PDS in reducing modeling interference of moisture content in soil salinity estimation. Specifically, all of the PLSR models generated before and after spectral correction have achieved a certain level of success in soil salinity estimation (R2P=0.79~0.91, RMSEP=2.6~3.98 g·kg-1, RPD=1.98~2.37). Compared with PLSR (R2P=0.86, RMSEP=3.02 g·kg-1, RPD=2.21), OSC-PLSR could effectively improve the soil salinity estimation accuracy with R2P=0.91, RMSEP=2.6 g·kg-1, RPD=2.37, respectively. However, the PDS-PLSR model was not effective with R2P=0.79, RMSEP=3.98 g·kg-1 and RPD=1.98, respectively. The representation order of the model was OSC-PLSR>PLSR>PDS-PLSR. Furthermore, the analysis strategy of the variable importance in the projection (VIP) combined with Spearman correlation coefficients (r) were used for exploring the estimative mechanism. The important wavelengths (VIP>1) of the models overlap with the sensitive wavelengths (|r|>0.4), which is of great significance for the soil salinity estimation. In comparison, OSC-PLSR accurately refines the wavelengths near 830, 1 940 and 2 050 nm that are important to the estimation model, while general PLSR and PDS-PLSR contain much redundant information. Overall, the OSC-PLSR model has strong moisture resistance in Vis-NIR soil salinity estimation, which provides feasibility for soil salinity study under soil moisture.
|
|
Received: 2020-09-28
Accepted: 2020-12-30
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
CAO Jian-fei, WANG Zhao-hai
E-mail: cjfsdnu@163.com; wzh13306408828@126.com
|
|
[1] Wang F, Shi Z, Biswas A, et al. Geoderma, 2020, 365: 114211.
[2] Zhu M K, Kong F L, Li Y, et al. Environmental Research, 2020, 187: 109659.
[3] Priyadarshanee M, Greve M, Knadel M, et al. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2018, 82(6): 1333.
[4] Lobell D, Asner G. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2002, 66(3): 722.
[5] Yang X G, Yu Y. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2017, 55(5): 2525.
[6] Wang X P, Zhang F, Ding J L, et al. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 615: 918.
[7] Mouazen A M, Karoui R, Baerdemaeker J, et al. Soil Science Society America Journal, 2006, 70(4): 1295.
[8] Hong Y S, Lei Y, Chen Y Y, et al. Remote Sensing, 2017, 10(1): 28.
[9] WANG Shi-fang, HAN Ping, SONG Hai-yan, et al(王世芳，韩 平，宋海燕，等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2019, 39(6): 1986.
[10] Nouri M, Gomez C, Gorretta N, et al. Geoderma, 2017, 298: 54.
[11] Franceschini M H D, Demattê J A M, Kooistra L, et al. Soil and Tillage Research, 2018, 177: 19.
[12] Cheng H, Shen R L, Chen Y Y, et al. Geoderma, 2019, 336: 59.
[13] Jiang Q H, Chen Y Y, Guo L, et al. Remote Sensing, 2016, 8(9): 755.
[14] Chen H Y, Zhao G X, Li Y H, et al. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2019, 19(7): 1499.
[15] Weng Y L, Gong P, Zhu Z L. Pedosphere, 2010, 20(3): 378.
[16] Liu W D, Baret Frederic, Gu X F, et al. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2002, 81(2): 238.
[17] PENG Xiang, HU Dan, ZENG Wen-zhi, et al(彭 翔，胡 丹，曾文治，等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2016, 32(11): 167. |
| [1] |
WANG Hui-min1, 2, YU Lei1, XU Kai-lei1, 2, JIANG Xiao-guang1, 2, WAN Yu-qing1, 2*. Estimation of Salt Content of Saline Soil in Arid Areas Based on GF-5 Hyperspectral Image[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(07): 2278-2286. |
| [2] |
YANG Yan-ling1, Andy Hsitien Shen1, FAN Yu-rong2, HUANG Wei-zhi1, PEI Jing-cheng1*. UV-Vis-NIR Spectroscopic Characteristics of Vanadium-Rich
Hydrothermal Synthetic Emeralds From Russia[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(04): 1199-1203. |
| [3] |
XIE Lin-jiang, HONG Ming-jian*, YU Zhi-rong. A Wavelength Selection Method Combining Direct Orthogonal Signal Correction and Monte Carlo[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(02): 440-445. |
| [4] |
YE Rong-ke1, KONG Qing-chen1, LI Dao-liang1, 2, CHEN Ying-yi1, 2, ZHANG Yu-quan1, LIU Chun-hong1, 2*. Shrimp Freshness Detection Method Based on Broad Learning System[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(01): 164-169. |
| [5] |
HU Xiao-yan, CUI Xu, HAN Xiao-ping, ZHANG Zhi-yong, QIN Gang, SONG Hai-yan*. Study on Soil Organic Matter Prediction Model Based on Moisture Correction Algorithm and Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(04): 1059-1062. |
| [6] |
ZHOU Xiao-hong1,2,3, ZHANG Fei1,2,3*, ZHANG Hai-wei1,2,3, ZHANG Xian-long1,2,3, YUAN Jie1,2,3. A Study of Soil Salinity Inversion Based on Multispectral Remote Sensing Index in Ebinur Lake Wetland Nature Reserve[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(04): 1229-1235. |
| [7] |
WU Ya-kun1, 2, LIU Guang-ming2*, SU Li-tan3*, YANG Jin-song2. Accurate Evaluation of Regional Soil Salinization Using Multi-Source Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 38(11): 3528-3533. |
| [8] |
YANG Tian-wei1, 2, LI Tao3, LI Jie-qing1, ZHANG Xue4, WANG Yuan-zhong2*, LIU Hong-gao1* . Study on the Discrimination of Boletus Edulis from Different Years and Origins with FTIR [J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2016, 36(07): 2117-2123. |
| [9] |
WANG Fei1,2, DING Jian-li1,2*. Soil Salinity Modelling Study with Salinity Inference Model Based on the Integration of Soil and Vegetation Spectrum in Arid Land[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2016, 36(06): 1848-1853. |
| [10] |
LIAO Xiang1, WANG Qing2, FU Ji-hong1, TANG Jun1* . Main Components of Xinjiang Lavender Essential Oil Determined by Partial Least Squares and Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2015, 35(09): 2526-2629. |
| [11] |
LIU Gui-song1, GUO Hao-song1, PAN Tao1*, WANG Ji-hua2, CAO Gan2 . Vis-NIR Spectroscopic Pattern Recognition Combined with SG Smoothing Applied to Breed Screening of Transgenic Sugarcane [J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2014, 34(10): 2701-2706. |
| [12] |
LI Xiao-ming1, 2, 3, HAN Ji-chang1, 2, 3*, LI Juan1, 2, 3 . Research on Hyperspectral Inversion of Soil Salinity in Typical Semiarid Area [J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2014, 34(04): 1081-1084. |
| [13] |
ZHANG Yu1, 2, TAN Li-hong1, HE Yong2* . Non-Destructive Brand Identification of Car Wax Using Visible and Near-Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2014, 34(02): 381-384. |
| [14] |
LIU Guang-ming1, WU Ya-kun2, YANG Jin-song1*, YU Shi-peng1 . Study on Three-Dimension Spatial Variability of Regional Soil Salinity Based on Spectral Indices [J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2013, 33(10): 2758-2761. |
| [15] |
WU Li-jun1, TIAN Kuang-da1, LI Qian-qian1, LI Zu-hong2, QIU Kai-xian1, MIN Shun-geng1* . Study on the Model of Six Components in Tobacco Using OSC-PCR [J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2013, 33(06): 1517-1520. |
|
|
|
|
