不同铅浓度土壤XRF光谱的频率域去噪及规律研究

doi:10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2020)09-2875-09

Abstract
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (6143 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract In recent years, the rapid development of global industry and the advancement of urbanization have triggered a series of environmental problems, in which soil heavy metal lead (Pb) pollution has caused widespread concern among researchers. X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectroscopy has the advantages of low cost, fast analysis speed and suitable for large-area monitoring. It has been widely used in many fields, such as soil pollution detection and ecological environment protection, and it has broad prospects for development. Therefore, it is of great practical significance to fully excavate the XRF spectral information of soil, which can provide solutions for the efficient detection and prevention of soil pollution, the inversion of soil environmental and ecological parameters, and the early warning of heavy metal pollution in mining areas. At present, most of the research on XRF spectroscopy focuses on the accurate evaluation of soil heavy metal concentration measurement and environmental quality assessment, while there are few in-depth studies on the variation of soil XRF spectral characteristics. Time-frequency analysis method can transform complex signals in the time domain into frequency domain space, and detect abnormal information in spectral signals from the angle of the frequency domain. It is an effective method for detecting the change of spectral difference features. Among them, harmonic analysis (HA) could be used for noise removal of electromagnetic signals; smoothed pseudo Wigner-Ville distribution (SPWVD) selects the appropriate basis function in advance, which can highlight the time-frequency local details of the original signal. This paper firstly used HA method to explore the denoising effect of soil XRF spectra with different Pb concentrations, and then used SPWVD of the spectrum to study the local law of denoising XRF spectra of soil samples sampled in the field. The results showed that when the number of harmonic decomposition was 400, soil XRF spectrum de-drying effect was better and saved time, and retained the characteristics of the spectrum. The Pb concentration of soil samples and the distribution of frequency peaks of SPWVD in the XRF spectrum on the 400, 600～700 band sequences had certain regularity. According to this regularity, the Pb concentration of soil in this area could be identified as exceeding the standard, in all in-situ sampled soil, 75% of samples with excessive Pb concentrations could be identified, there was a higher frequency peak near the band sequence of 400 (frequency less than 400 Hz) or 2 very strong frequency peaks (frequency greater than 400 Hz); in all in-situ sampled soil, 79.17% of samples with Pb concentration not exceeded the standard could be identified, there was a strong frequency peak (frequency greater than 400 Hz) near the band sequence of 400, and there were 3 distinct frequency peak distributions between the 600 and 700 band sequences. Accordingly, it was inferred that the XRF spectral characteristic band interval of soil Pb concentration exceeding the standard in this area was 6.42 and 9.42~10.92 keV. Therefore, by introducing the time-frequency analysis method, soil XRF spectral frequency domain analysis and visualization are realized, which provides a new idea for deep mining the characteristics of Pb pollution spectrum and abnormal information.

Key words：Heavy metal; Soil XRF spectra; Harmonic analysis; Smoothed pseudo Wigner-Ville distribution

Received: 2019-08-10 Accepted: 2019-12-18

ZTFLH:

TP7

Corresponding Authors: LIU Pu-dong E-mail: liupudong19@sdjzu.edu.cn

Cite this article:

URL:

https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2020)09-2875-09 OR https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/Y2020/V40/I09/2875

[1] Lal R. Science, 2004, 304(5677): 1623.
[2] Rial M, Cortizas A M, Rodríguez-Lado L. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 609: 1411.
[3] Guan Q, Wang F, Xu C, et al. Chemosphere, 2018, 193: 189.
[4] Rasheed T, Bilal M, Nabeel F, et al. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 615: 476.
[5] Kilbride C, Poole J, Hutchings T R. Environmental Pollution, 2006, 143(1): 16.
[6] HU Ming-qing(胡明情). Environmental Science & Technology(环境科学与技术), 2015, 38(S2): 269.
[7] Horta A, Malone B, Stockmann U, et al. Geoderma, 2015, 241(521): 180.
[8] ZHANG Shu-jie, WU Wen-qi, JIANG Tian-yi, et al(张术杰, 吴文琪, 蒋天怡, 等). Chinese Rare Earths(稀土), 2012, 33(4): 77.
[9] PENG Hong-liu, YANG Zhou-sheng, ZHAO Jie, et al(彭洪柳, 杨周生, 赵婕, 等). Journal of Agro-Environment Science(农业环境科学学报), 2018, 37(7): 1386.
[10] Kodom K, Preko K, Boamah D. Soil and Sediment Contamination: An International Journal, 2012, 21(8): 1006.
[11] KUANG Rong-xi, HU Wen-you, HE Yue, et al(邝荣禧, 胡文友, 何跃, 等). Soils(土壤), 2015, 47(3): 589.
[12] Salazar M J, Rodriguez J H, Cid C V, et al. Geoderma, 2016, 279: 97.
[13] Lintern A, Leahy P J, Heijnis H, et al. Water Research, 2016, 105: 34.
[14] YANG Gui-lan, SHANG Zhao-cong, LI Liang-jun, et al(杨桂兰, 商照聪, 李良君, 等). Applied Chemical Industry(应用化工), 2016, 45(8): 1586.
[15] Hu B, Chen S, Hu J, et al. PLoS ONE, 2017, 12(2), e0172438.
[16] WANG Qi-rui, CAI Qing-xiang, MA Cong-an, et al(王启瑞, 才庆祥, 马从安, 等). Coal Science and Technology(煤炭科学技术), 2006, 34(10): 72.
[17] YANG Yong, LIU Ai-jun, CHAO Lumengqiqige, et al(杨勇, 刘爱军, 朝鲁孟其其格, 等). Ecology and Environmental Sciences(生态环境学报), 2016, 25(5): 885.
[18] YU Tao, HAN Qing-kai, SUN Wei, et al(于涛, 韩清凯, 孙伟, 等). Journal of Northeastern University·Natural Science(东北大学学报·自然科学版), 2006, 27(5)：56.
[19] XU Yuan-nan, ZHAO Yuan, LIU Li-ping, et al(许元男, 赵远, 刘丽萍, 等). Acta Physica Sinica(物理学报), 2010, 59(2): 980.
[20] Jakubauskas M E, Legates D R, Kastens J H. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 2001, 67(4): 461.
[21] YE Fei, WU Jia-quan, ZHANG Xin-yu, et al(叶飞, 吴加权, 张馨予, 等). Journal of Vibration and Shock(振动与冲击), 2018, 37(16): 234.
[22] Jakubauskas M E, Legates D R, Kastens J H. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2002, 37(1-3): 127.
[23] Bradley B A, Jacob R W, Hermance J F, et al. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2007, 106(2): 137.
[24] Hu B, Chen S, Hu J, et al. PLoS ONE, 2017, 12(2)：e0172438.