|
|
|
|
|
|
| Ca and Mg Analysis in Solution by Solution Cathode Glow Discharge Combined with Standard Addition Method and Background Removal |
| ZHENG Pei-chao1, HE Miao1, WANG Jin-mei1*, WANG Ning-shen1, LI Wei-qi1, LUO Yuan-jiang1, DONG Da-ming2, ZHENG Kun-peng1, YAN Bo-wen1 |
1. Chongqing Municipal Level Key Laboratory of Photoelectronic Information Sensing and Transmitting Technology, College of Optoelectronic Engineering, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications，Chongqing 400065, China
2. Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Plant, National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences，Beijing 100097, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Solution cathode glow discharge atmosphere emission spectrometry (SCGD-AES) is affected by the matrix effect in aqueous solution. Moreover, actual water contains many elements and the components are relatively complex, which makes matrix effect more serious and leads to a decrease in accuracy of metal element concentration prediction. In order to reduce matrix effect of aqueous solution in SCGD-AES, quantitative analysis methods are often used to analyze metal elements. Among these methods, standard addition method is especially suitable for the situation that matrix effect or interfering substance is relatively significant. However, standard addition method is vulnerable to background interference, resulting in the error of results. Therefore, the background interference must be eliminated before standard addition method is carried out. The simplest method to eliminate the interference is off-peak correction method, which deduces the background intensity value measured at the left and right of the linear peak, so as to eliminate the background interference. Wavelet transform method is also applicable to eliminate background interference and it is universal. This method is applied to multi-scale stratification of wavelet, and then the low-frequency coefficient of wavelet is processed to obtain the corrected data. Here, Ca and Mg content in solution were predicted by off-peak correction and wavelet transform method based on standard addition method in a homemade SCGD- AES system. For the traditional standard addition method, the relative error of the Ca samples with concentrations of 5, 10 and 20 mg·L-1 were measured as 157.0%, 105.1% and 47.0%, respectively. The REs of Mg in the three groups of samples were 20.1%, 3.1% and 2.8%, respectively. However, when the standard addition method and off-peak correction were combined, REs of Ca were reduced to 15.4%, -8.8% and 3.3%, and REs of Mg were reduced to 14.5%, 0.1% and 0.8%, respectively. When standard addition method by wavelet transform to eliminate background interference was employed, REs of Ca decreased to 13.2%, -7.6% and -1.4% respectively, and REs of Mg decreased to 13.4%, -0.4% and 0.5% respectively. The experimental results show that the accuracy of Ca and Mg measurement is significantly improved by off-peak and wavelet transform method. The two methods can effectively eliminate background interference, reduce matrix effect and improve the prediction accuracy. The wavelet transform combined with standard addition method can be used for various background correction occasions, without selecting appropriate background correction points, and the prediction accuracy is higher, which has advantages compared with off-peak correction method.
|
|
Received: 2018-11-14
Accepted: 2019-03-04
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
WANG Jin-mei
E-mail: wangjm@cqupt.edu.cn
|
|
[1] Chahrou O, Malone J. Protein and Peptide Letters, 2017, 24(3): 253.
[2] Etorki A. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry, 2016, 3(2): 1.
[3] Yi R X, Guo L B, Zou X H, et al. Optics Express, 2016, 24(3): 2607.
[4] Wang Jinmei, Li Shiyu, Zheng Peichao, et al. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2018, 33: 1014.
[5] Zheng Peichao, Chen Yanying, Wang Jinmei, et al. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2016, 31(10): 2037.
[6] Wang J M, Tang P F, Zheng P C, et al. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2017, 32: 1925.
[7] Zheng Peichao, Gong Yaming, Wang Jinmei, et al. Analytical Letters, 2017, 50(9): 1512.
[8] Zheng P C, Gong Y M, Wang J M, et al. Analytical Letters, 2017, 50(9): 1512.
[9] LIU Xiao, YANG Xiao-tao, ZHAN Xiu-chun, et al(刘 晓，杨啸涛，詹秀春，等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2017, 37(3): 971.
[10] Schwartz A J, Ray S J, Hieftje G M. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy, 2015, 105: 77.
[11] Maury A, Revilla R I. Applied Spectroscopy, 2015, 69(8): 984.
[12] Wang Jinmei, Tang Pengfei, Zheng Peichao, et al. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2017, 32(10): 1925. |
| [1] |
FENG Xiao-gui1, KONG Xue-yan2, HE Qian-ge1, WANG Jian-chen1, CHEN Jing1. A Modified Standard Addition Method and Its Application in ICP Emission Spectrometry[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2017, 37(11): 3579-3584. |
| [2] |
FANG Li1,3, ZHAO Nan-jing1,3*, MA Ming-jun1,2,3, MENG De-shuo1,3, GU Yan-hong1,2,3, JIA Yao1,2,3, LIU Wen-qing1,3, LIU Jian-guo1,3. Quantitative Analysis of Pb，Cd，Cr and Cu in Soil Using Standard Addition Method Combined with Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2017, 37(10): 3274-3280. |
| [3] |
LIU Xiao, YANG Xiao-tao, ZHAN Xiu-chun*, YUAN Ji-hai, FAN Xing-tao, JIAO Ju . Solution Cathode Glow Discharge Based on Charge Coupled Device Detector[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2017, 37(03): 971-977. |
| [4] |
WANG Su-fang1, 2, LIU Yun1, GONG Li-hua1, DONG Chun-hong3, FU De-xue3, WANG Guo-qing1* . High Throughput Screening Analysis of Preservatives and Sweeteners in Carbonated Beverages Based on Improved Standard Addition Method [J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2016, 36(02): 482-486. |
| [5] |
WANG Li-ping1, 2, FENG Hai-tao1, DONG Ya-ping1*, PENG Jiao-yu1, 2, LI Wu1, SHI Hai-qin3, WANG Yong4 . Standard Addition Determination of Impurities in Na2CrO4 by ICP-AES [J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2015, 35(02): 523-526. |
| [6] |
FANG Li1, ZHAO Nan-jing1, MENG De-shuo1, YUAN Jing2, TANG Jie2, WANG Yin1, YU Yang1, MA Ming-jun1, HU Li1, ZHANG Da-hai1, XIAO Xue1, WANG Yu1, LIU Jian-guo1, LIU Wen-qing1 . Analysis of Lead in Unknown Samples Based on the Standard Addition Method Using Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy [J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2015, 35(01): 208-211. |
| [7] |
ZHAO Yan, CHEN Xiao-yan*, XU Dong-yu, ZHANG Shi-yuan, CHEN Ze-yong . Determination of Chlorine in Gasoline by Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2014, 34(12): 3406-3410. |
| [8] |
CHUAN Na1, 2, XU Yi1, 2*, CHEN Gang1, 3, WEN Zhong-quan1, 3, HE Li1, 2, WEN Zhi-yu1, 3 . Detection of Sorbic Acid in Food by Homemade Micro-Spectrometer Analytical System[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2012, 32(08): 2299-2302. |
| [9] |
HE Xiao-mei1,XIE Hua-lin1,NIE Xi-du1,TANG You-gen2 . Determination of Trace Impurities in High Purity Titanium Dioxide by High Resolution Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry [J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2007, 27(06): 1192-1196. |
| [10] |
JIN Xian-zhong, ZHENG Shu-zhao, LI Rong-zhuan, QIU Yin, CAI Yan-ping . Determination of Soluble Heavy Metal Pb，Cd and Cr in Water Based Architectural Coatings for Indoor Decorating and Refurbishing Materials by ICP-AES [J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2004, 24(09): 1127-1129. |
|
|
|
|
