|
|
|
|
|
|
Spectral Characteristic Analysis and Spectral Identification of Desert Plants in Yanchi, Ningxia |
JI Tong1, 2, WANG Bo1, 2, YANG Jun-ying1, 2, LI Qiang1, 2, HE Guo-xing1, 2, PAN Dong-rong3, LIU Xiao-ni1, 2* |
1. College of Pratacultural Science, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
2. Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecosystem, Ministry of Education/Pratacultural Engineering Laboratory of Gansu Province (Gansu Agricultural University), Lanzhou 730070, China
3. Grassland Technique Extension Station of Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730070, China
|
|
|
Abstract The desert grassland in Yanchi County of Ningxia belongs to the mid-temperate arid climate. Due to over-utilization, different degrees of degradation has occurred, and the proportion of degradation indicator species has increased, resulting in large differences in the composition of different desert grassland communities. How to distinguish between different desert grassland plants and determine the Dynamic degradation monitoring of indicator species is the key to understanding the degree of desert grassland degradation. At present, random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM) and K-neighbor (KNN) classification models are widely used in the remote sensing classification of forest plants and crops. The classification and recognition effect is good, but few studies on the classification and recognition of grassland, especially the desert grassland. Therefore, in July, the ASD ground feature spectrometer was used in Ningxia Yanchi Erbukeng, Fengjigou, Gaoshawo and Mahuangshan. In the desert grassland, a total of 442 spectral data of 32 species of plants were collected for spectral feature analysis, and 7 vegetation indexes were selected: normalized vegetation index 705 (NDVI705), green channel vegetation index (GNDVI), photochemical vegetation index (PRI), soil Adjusted vegetation index (OSAVI), visual pressure resistance index (VARI), vegetation attenuation index (PSRI) and normalized water index (NDWI) as random forest model (RF), support vector machine (SVM) model, K-neighbor (KNN) the original variables of the model, classify and identify 32 species of desert grassland plants, and screen the best model by comparing the accuracy of the classification models. The research results show that: (1) The spectral reflectance of different plants is in line with the characteristics of green plants but there are obvious differences between the different bands of the original spectrum of each plant, and the difference in the water absorption bands of the original spectrum of plants is obvious, and there is a red edge blue shift phenomenon; (2) RF The classification accuracy of the three classification models, SVM and KNN for 32 species of plants reached 0.98, 0.94 and 0.98, respectively, and the recognition effect was good. However, the three classification models all made mistakes in the classification of Artemisia spp. Judgment; (3) NDWI and PRI are the key indicators to distinguish desert grassland plants in the importance of random forest model indicators, indicating that desert plant canopy water and carotenoid content are important factors affecting the spectral classification of desert grassland plants. The experiment uses a random forest model (RF), support vector machine (SVM) and K-neighbor (KNN) classification methods to establish a classification model for main plants, laying the foundation for remote sensing monitoring of desert grasslands.
|
Received: 2021-02-01
Accepted: 2021-05-31
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
LIU Xiao-ni
E-mail: Liuxn@gsau.edu.cn
|
|
[1] WANG Bo, LIU Xiao-ni, WANG Hong-wei, et al(王 波, 柳小妮, 王洪伟, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2019, 39(5): 1509.
[2] NIJAT Kasim, SHI Qing-dong, LIU Su-hong, et al(尼加提·卡斯木,师庆东,刘素红,等). Transactions of The Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery(农业机械学报), 2019, 50(1): 217.
[3] SHU Mei-yan, GU Xiao-he, SUN Lin, et al(束美艳, 顾晓鹤, 孙 林, 等). Scientia Agricultura Sinica(中国农业科学), 2018, 51(18): 3486.
[4] JIA Xue-qin, FENG Mei-chen, YANG Wu-de, et al(贾学勤, 冯美臣, 杨武德, 等). Chinese Journal of Ecology(生态学杂志), 2018, 37(2): 424.
[5] LI Chan, WANG Jun-jie, WU Guo-feng, et al(李 婵, 王俊杰, 邬国锋, 等). Journal of Shenzhen University·Science and Engineering(深圳大学学报·理工版), 2018, 35(3): 307.
[6] YANG Jun-wen, ZHANG Jin-shui, ZHU Xiu-fang, et al(杨珺雯, 张锦水, 朱秀芳, 等). Journal of Beijing Normal University·Natural Science(北京师范大学学报·自然科学版), 2015, 51(S1): 82.
[7] SHAO Qi, CHEN Yun-hao, YANG Shu-ting, et al(邵 琦, 陈云浩, 杨淑婷, 等). Geography and Geo-Information Science(地理与地理信息科学), 2019, 35(5): 34.
[8] YASENJIANG Kahaer, NIJAT Kasim, NIGARA Tashpola, et al(亚森江·喀哈尔, 尼加提·卡斯木, 尼格拉·塔什甫拉提). Journal of Wheat Crops(麦类作物学报), 2019, 39(2): 225.
[9] WU Wen-li, YUAN Ye, LI Yuan-yuan, et al(武文丽, 袁 也, 李园园, 等). Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences(新疆农业科学), 2020, 57(1): 149.
[10] WU Hong-qi, FAN Yan-min, JIN Gui-li, et al(武红旗, 范燕敏, 靳瑰丽, 等). Pratacultural Science(草业科学), 2019, 36(7): 1765.
[11] CAO Xiao-ming, FENG Yi-ming, SHI Jian-kang, et al(曹晓明, 冯益明, 史建康, 等). Journal of Northeast Forestry University(东北林业大学学报), 2020, 48(1): 56.
[12] WEI Huai-dong, CHEN Fang, ZHANG Bo, et al(魏怀东, 陈 芳, 张 勃, 等). Pratacultural Science(草业科学), 2018, 35(3): 590.
[13] JIANG Li, ZHU Chang-fu, YU Ting-ting, et al(姜 立, 朱长甫, 于婷婷, 等). SHENGWU HUAGONG(生物化工), 2020, 6(6): 136.
[14] BAI Juan, GONG Chun-mei, WANG Gang, et al(白 娟, 龚春梅, 王 刚, 等). Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica(西北植物学报), 2010, 30(12): 2444.
[15] YANG Hong-fei, LI Jian-long, MU Shao-jie, et al(杨红飞, 李建龙, 穆少杰, 等). Acta Prataculturae Sinica(草业学报), 2012, 21(6): 258.
|
[1] |
LI Hu1, ZHONG Yun1, 2, FENG Ya-ting1, LIN Zhen1, ZHU Shi-jiang1, 2*. Multi-Vegetation Index Soil Moisture Inversion Model Based on UAV
Remote Sensing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 207-214. |
[2] |
WANG Cai-ling1,ZHANG Jing1,WANG Hong-wei2*, SONG Xiao-nan1, JI Tong3. A Hyperspectral Image Classification Model Based on Band Clustering and Multi-Scale Structure Feature Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 258-265. |
[3] |
GAO Hong-sheng1, GUO Zhi-qiang1*, ZENG Yun-liu2, DING Gang2, WANG Xiao-yao2, LI Li3. Early Classification and Detection of Kiwifruit Soft Rot Based on
Hyperspectral Image Band Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 241-249. |
[4] |
WU Hu-lin1, DENG Xian-ming1*, ZHANG Tian-cai1, LI Zhong-sheng1, CEN Yi2, WANG Jia-hui1, XIONG Jie1, CHEN Zhi-hua1, LIN Mu-chun1. A Revised Target Detection Algorithm Based on Feature Separation Model of Target and Background for Hyperspectral Imagery[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 283-291. |
[5] |
CHU Bing-quan1, 2, LI Cheng-feng1, DING Li3, GUO Zheng-yan1, WANG Shi-yu1, SUN Wei-jie1, JIN Wei-yi1, HE Yong2*. Nondestructive and Rapid Determination of Carbohydrate and Protein in T. obliquus Based on Hyperspectral Imaging Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3732-3741. |
[6] |
HUANG You-ju1, TIAN Yi-chao2, 3*, ZHANG Qiang2, TAO Jin2, ZHANG Ya-li2, YANG Yong-wei2, LIN Jun-liang2. Estimation of Aboveground Biomass of Mangroves in Maowei Sea of Beibu Gulf Based on ZY-1-02D Satellite Hyperspectral Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3906-3915. |
[7] |
ZHOU Bei-bei1, LI Heng-kai1*, LONG Bei-ping2. Variation Analysis of Spectral Characteristics of Reclaimed Vegetation in an Ionic Rare Earth Mining Area[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3946-3954. |
[8] |
YUAN Wei-dong1, 2, JU Hao2, JIANG Hong-zhe1, 2, LI Xing-peng2, ZHOU Hong-ping1, 2*, SUN Meng-meng1, 2. Classification of Different Maturity Stages of Camellia Oleifera Fruit
Using Hyperspectral Imaging Technique[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3419-3426. |
[9] |
FU Gen-shen1, LÜ Hai-yan1, YAN Li-peng1, HUANG Qing-feng1, CHENG Hai-feng2, WANG Xin-wen3, QIAN Wen-qi1, GAO Xiang4, TANG Xue-hai1*. A C/N Ratio Estimation Model of Camellia Oleifera Leaves Based on
Canopy Hyperspectral Characteristics[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3404-3411. |
[10] |
LI Si-yuan, JIAO Jian-nan, WANG Chi*. Specular Reflection Removal Method Based on Polarization Spectrum
Fusion and Its Application in Vegetation Health Monitoring[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3607-3614. |
[11] |
SHEN Ying, WU Pan, HUANG Feng*, GUO Cui-xia. Identification of Species and Concentration Measurement of Microalgae Based on Hyperspectral Imaging[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3629-3636. |
[12] |
ZHENG Shu-yuan1, 2, HAI Yan1, 2, HE Meng-qi1, 2, WANG Jian-xiong1, 2. Construction of Vegetation Index in Visible Light Band of GF-6 Image With Higher Discrimination[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3509-3517. |
[13] |
XIE Peng, WANG Zheng-hai*, XIAO Bei, CAO Hai-ling, HUANG Yi, SU Wen-lin. Hyperspectral Quantitative Inversion of Soil Selenium Content Based on sCARS-PSO-SVM[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3599-3606. |
[14] |
QIAN Rui1, XU Wei-heng2, 3 , 4*, HUANG Shao-dong2, WANG Lei-guang2, 3, 4, LU Ning2, OU Guang-long1. Tea Plantations Extraction Based on GF-5 Hyperspectral Remote Sensing
Imagery in the Mountainous Area[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3591-3598. |
[15] |
ZHU Zhi-cheng1, WU Yong-feng2*, MA Jun-cheng2, JI Lin2, LIU Bin-hui3*, JIN Hai-liang1*. Response of Winter Wheat Canopy Spectra to Chlorophyll Changes Under Water Stress Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Remote Sensing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3524-3534. |
|
|
|
|