|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparison between the Effects of Visible Light and Multispectral Sensor Based on Low-Altitude Remote Sensing Platform in the Evaluation of Rice Sheath Blight |
ZHAO Xiao-yang1, 2, ZHANG Jian1, 2*, ZHANG Dong-yan3, ZHOU Xin-gen4, LIU Xiao-hui3, XIE Jing5* |
1. College of Resources and Environment, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
2. Key Laboratory of Farmland Conservation in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Wuhan 430070, China
3. Anhui Engineering Laboratory of Agro-Ecological Big Data, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China
4. Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center, Beaumont, TX 77713, USA
5. College of Science, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China |
|
|
Abstract Efficient and non-destructive assessment of crop disease grade is of great significance to the practical agricultural production and research. In this study, the feasibility of low-altitude UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle) remote sensing platform for the disease grade assessment of rice Sheath Blight (ShB) was discussed. Then the spectral response differences of visible light sensor and multispectral sensor and their effects on the spectral reflectance acquisition of rice with ShB were analyzed. And rice ShB monitoring effects of two kinds of sensors were compared quantitively. The study area consisted of 67 rice plots with different varieties, each of which was divided into inoculation zone and infection zone. The drone was Phantom 3 Advanced, a small consumer-grade UAV made by DJI-Innovations company, and the payloads were the self-contained visible light sensor and Micasense RedEdgeTM multispectral sensor to acquire remote sensing images respectively. At the same time, the rice ShB disease grades were investigated by manual expert recognition and measured NDVI was obtained with Trimble's GreenSeeker Handheld Crop Sensor. Remote sensing images were preprocessed by image mosaic, layer stacking and radiometric calibration. A total of 134 plots in inoculation and infection zones of visible light image were used to calculate seven kinds of visible light vegetation indices, namely NDI (Normalized Difference Index), ExG (Excess Green), ExR (Excess Red), ExG-ExR, B*, G* and R*. Besides the above seven kinds of visible light vegetation indices, multispectral image was calculated by three kinds of multispectral vegetation indices additionally, namely NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index), RVI (Ratio Vegetation Index) and NDWI (Normalized Difference Water Index). The correlation between the image-based vegetation index and ground-based NDVI was analyzed, and the optimal image-based vegetation indices of the visible light and multispectral sensor were selected to establish the disease grade inversion model of rice ShB. The results of correlation analysis showed that the fitting degree of image-based NDVI and ground-based NDVI based on multispectral sensor was the highest, and R2 was 0.914 and RMSE was 0.024 in the inoculation zone, while R2 and RMSE were 0.863 and 0.024 respectively in the infection zone. As for the visible light sensor, the correlation between image-based NDI and measured NDVI was best, and R2 was 0.875 and RMSE was 0.011 in the inoculation zone, while R2 was 0.703 and RMSE was 0.014 in the infection zone. The consistencies of the same image-based vegetation index and ground-based NDVI of two kinds of sensors and two kinds of zones were compared, which revealed that NDI, ExR, ExG-ExR, G*, ExG, R* except B* were mainly highly correlated with the measured NDVI. In the inoculation zones with severe disease, the two kinds of sensors had similar effects on the detection of rice ShB, but the monitoring effect of multispectral sensor was more precise and sensitive in infection zones with relatively lighter disease. The disease grade inversion model of rice ShB established by NDVI based on multispectral sensor was effective, whose R2 reached 0.624, and RMSE was 0.801 and prediction accuracy was 90.04%. The disease grade inversion model established by NDI based on visible light sensor was slightly worse, whose R2 was 0.580, and RMSE was 0.847 and prediction accuracy was 89.45%. The spectral response curves of visible light and multispectral sensor were compared and analyzed. The visible light sensor can obtain three bands of red, green, blue in the range of visible light, and wavelength range overlaps with each other, while the multispectral sensor including five imaging units can independently obtain five narrow-band spectral bands from visible light to near infrared providing subtler spectral information. Through comparing the average reflectance curves of rice in inoculation zone and infection zone, the multispectral sensor not only reflected bigger difference than visible light sensor in the visible light band, but also represented more obvious difference in the red and near infrared band, which demonstrated that the professional narrow-band sensor had an advantage over broad-band consumer-grade sensor in the rice ShB monitoring. In conclusion, it is feasible to evaluate the disease grade of rice ShB based on the low-altitude UAV remote sensing platform with visible light and multispectral sensor. The multispectral sensor is precise and sensitive which can be used for early detection of rice ShB, and the visible light sensor is less accurate but economical and easy to popularize. The results of this study are expected to provide decision support for diseases control and be beneficial to promoting precision agriculture and ensureing food security.
|
Received: 2018-01-15
Accepted: 2018-05-20
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
ZHANG Jian, XIE Jing
E-mail: jz@mail.hzau.edu.cn; xiejing625@mail.hzau.edu.cn
|
|
[1] Sumithra Muthayya,Jonathan D Sugimoto,Scott Montgomery,et al. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,2014,1324(1):7.
[2] Zhang Dongyan,Lan Yubin,Zhou Xingen,et al. In Proceedings of 2015 ASABE Annual International Meeting,New Orleans,Louisiana,USA,July 26-29,2015.
[3] Mosleh M K,Hassan Q K,Chowdhury E H. Sensors,2015,15(1):769.
[4] ZHANG Jing-cheng,YUAN Lin,WANG Ji-hua,et al(张竞成,袁 琳,王纪华,等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineer(农业工程学报),2012,28(20):1.
[5] ZHANG Dong-yan,SONG Xiao-yu,MA Zhi-hong,et al(张东彦,宋晓宇,马智宏,等). Scientia Agricultura Sinica(中国农业科学),2010,43(11):2239.
[6] Anne-Katrin Mahlein. Plant Disease,2016,100(2):241.
[7] Matheus Kuska,Mirwaes Wahabzada,Marlene Leucker,et al. Plant Methods,2015,11(1):28.
[8] Elke Bauriegel,Werner B. Herppich. Agriculture,2014,4(1):32.
[9] Qin Zhihao,Zhang Minghua. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation & Geoinformation,2005,7(2):115.
[10] Faranak Ghobadifar,Aimrun Wayayok,Shattri Mansor,et al. Geomatics,Natural Hazards and Risk,2016,7(1):237.
[11] Zhou X,Zheng H B,Xu X Q,et al. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing,2017,130:246.
[12] Jia Yinjiang,Su Zhongbin,Shen Weizheng,et al. International Journal of Smart Home,2016,10(5):159.
[13] Ballesteros R,Ortega J F,Hernández D,et al. Precision Agriculture,2014,15(6):579.
[14] Zhang Jian,Yang Chenghai,Song Huaibo,et al. Remote Sensing,2016,8(3):257.
[15] Sankaran Sindhuja,Maja Joe Mari,Buchanon Sherrie,et al. Sensors,2013,13(2):2117. |
[1] |
LI Hu1, ZHONG Yun1, 2, FENG Ya-ting1, LIN Zhen1, ZHU Shi-jiang1, 2*. Multi-Vegetation Index Soil Moisture Inversion Model Based on UAV
Remote Sensing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 207-214. |
[2] |
LI Si-yuan, JIAO Jian-nan, WANG Chi*. Specular Reflection Removal Method Based on Polarization Spectrum
Fusion and Its Application in Vegetation Health Monitoring[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3607-3614. |
[3] |
ZHENG Shu-yuan1, 2, HAI Yan1, 2, HE Meng-qi1, 2, WANG Jian-xiong1, 2. Construction of Vegetation Index in Visible Light Band of GF-6 Image With Higher Discrimination[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3509-3517. |
[4] |
FU Xiao-man1, 2, BAO Yu-long1, 2*, Bayaer Tubuxin1, 2, JIN Eerdemutu1, 2, BAO Yu-hai1, 2. Spectral Characteristics Analysis of Desert Steppe Vegetation Based on Field Online Multi-Angle Spectrometer[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3170-3179. |
[5] |
LIU Zhao1, 2, LI Hua-peng1, CHEN Hui1, 2, ZHANG Shu-qing1*. Maize Yield Forecasting and Associated Optimum Lead Time Research Based on Temporal Remote Sensing Data and Different Model[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2627-2637. |
[6] |
MA Bao-dong, YANG Xiang-ru, JIANG Zi-wei, CHE De-fu. Influence and Quantitative Analysis of Coal Dust Retention on Reflectance Spectra and Vegetation Index of Leaves[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(06): 1947-1952. |
[7] |
REN Hong-rui1, 2, ZHANG Yue-qi2, HE Qi-jin3, LI Rong-ping1, ZHOU Guang-sheng4, 5*. Extraction of Pddy Rice Planting Area Based on Multi-Temporal FY-3 MERSI Remote Sensing Images[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(05): 1606-1611. |
[8] |
FAN Yi-guang1, 3, 5, FENG Hai-kuan1, 2, 3*, LIU Yang1, 3, 4, BIAN Ming-bo1, 3, ZHAO Yu1, 3, YANG Gui-jun1, 3, QIAN Jian-guo5. Estimation of Nitrogen Content in Potato Plants Based on Spectral Spatial Characteristics[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(05): 1532-1540. |
[9] |
MENG Hao-ran1, 2, LI Cun-jun1, 3*, ZHENG Xiang-yu1, 2, GONG Yu-sheng2, LIU Yu1, 3, PAN Yu-chun1, 3. Research on Extraction of Camellia Oleifera by Integrating Spectral, Texture and Time Sequence Remote Sensing Information[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(05): 1589-1597. |
[10] |
WANG Shao-yan1, CHEN Zhi-fei2, LUO Yang1, JIAN Chun-xia1, ZHOU Jun-jie3, JIN Yuan1, XU Pei-dan3, LEI Si-yue3, XU Bing-cheng1, 4*. Study on Nutrient Content of Bothriochloa Ischaemum Community in the Loess Hilly-Gully Region Based on Spectral Characteristics[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(05): 1612-1621. |
[11] |
FENG Hai-kuan1, 2, TAO Hui-lin1, ZHAO Yu1, YANG Fu-qin3, FAN Yi-guang1, YANG Gui-jun1*. Estimation of Chlorophyll Content in Winter Wheat Based on UAV Hyperspectral[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(11): 3575-3580. |
[12] |
WANG Xiao-xuan1, LU Xiao-ping1*, MENG Qing-yan2, 3, LI Guo-qing4, WANG Jun4, ZHANG Lin-lin2, 3, YANG Ze-nan1. Inversion of Leaf Area Index Based on GF-6 WFV Spectral Vegetation
Index Model[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(07): 2278-2283. |
[13] |
WANG Xiao-xuan1, LU Xiao-ping1*, LI Guo-qing2, WANG Jun2, YANG Zen-an1, ZHOU Yu-shi1, FENG Zhi-li1. Combining the Red Edge-Near Infrared Vegetation Indexes of DEM to
Extract Urban Vegetation Information[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(07): 2284-2289. |
[14] |
WANG Jin1, 2, CHEN Shu-tao1, 2*, DING Si-cheng1, 2, YAO Xue-wen1, 2, ZHANG Miao-miao1, 2, HU Zheng-hua2. Relationships Between the Leaf Respiration of Soybean and Vegetation
Indexes and Leaf Characteristics[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(05): 1607-1613. |
[15] |
JI Tong1, 2, WANG Bo1, 2, YANG Jun-ying1, 2, LI Qiang1, 2, HE Guo-xing1, 2, PAN Dong-rong3, LIU Xiao-ni1, 2*. Spectral Characteristic Analysis and Spectral Identification of Desert Plants in Yanchi, Ningxia[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(03): 678-685. |
|
|
|
|