宁夏盐池荒漠植物光谱特征分析及光谱识别

doi:10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2022)03-0678-08

Abstract
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (4699 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The desert grassland in Yanchi County of Ningxia belongs to the mid-temperate arid climate. Due to over-utilization, different degrees of degradation has occurred, and the proportion of degradation indicator species has increased, resulting in large differences in the composition of different desert grassland communities. How to distinguish between different desert grassland plants and determine the Dynamic degradation monitoring of indicator species is the key to understanding the degree of desert grassland degradation. At present, random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM) and K-neighbor (KNN) classification models are widely used in the remote sensing classification of forest plants and crops. The classification and recognition effect is good, but few studies on the classification and recognition of grassland, especially the desert grassland. Therefore, in July, the ASD ground feature spectrometer was used in Ningxia Yanchi Erbukeng, Fengjigou, Gaoshawo and Mahuangshan. In the desert grassland, a total of 442 spectral data of 32 species of plants were collected for spectral feature analysis, and 7 vegetation indexes were selected: normalized vegetation index 705 (NDVI705), green channel vegetation index (GNDVI), photochemical vegetation index (PRI), soil Adjusted vegetation index (OSAVI), visual pressure resistance index (VARI), vegetation attenuation index (PSRI) and normalized water index (NDWI) as random forest model (RF), support vector machine (SVM) model, K-neighbor (KNN) the original variables of the model, classify and identify 32 species of desert grassland plants, and screen the best model by comparing the accuracy of the classification models. The research results show that: (1) The spectral reflectance of different plants is in line with the characteristics of green plants but there are obvious differences between the different bands of the original spectrum of each plant, and the difference in the water absorption bands of the original spectrum of plants is obvious, and there is a red edge blue shift phenomenon; (2) RF The classification accuracy of the three classification models, SVM and KNN for 32 species of plants reached 0.98, 0.94 and 0.98, respectively, and the recognition effect was good. However, the three classification models all made mistakes in the classification of Artemisia spp. Judgment; (3) NDWI and PRI are the key indicators to distinguish desert grassland plants in the importance of random forest model indicators, indicating that desert plant canopy water and carotenoid content are important factors affecting the spectral classification of desert grassland plants. The experiment uses a random forest model (RF), support vector machine (SVM) and K-neighbor (KNN) classification methods to establish a classification model for main plants, laying the foundation for remote sensing monitoring of desert grasslands.

Key words：Hyperspectral; Desert plants; Classification model; Vegetation index

Received: 2021-02-01 Accepted: 2021-05-31

ZTFLH:

O433

Corresponding Authors: LIU Xiao-ni E-mail: Liuxn@gsau.edu.cn

Cite this article:

JI Tong^1,2,WANG Bo^{1, et al. Spectral Characteristic Analysis and Spectral Identification of Desert Plants in Yanchi, Ningxia[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(03): 678-685.}

URL:

https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2022)03-0678-08 OR https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/Y2022/V42/I03/678

[1] WANG Bo, LIU Xiao-ni, WANG Hong-wei, et al（王波, 柳小妮, 王洪伟, 等）. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis（光谱学与光谱分析）, 2019, 39(5): 1509.
[2] NIJAT Kasim, SHI Qing-dong, LIU Su-hong, et al（尼加提·卡斯木，师庆东，刘素红，等）. Transactions of The Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery（农业机械学报）, 2019, 50(1): 217.
[3] SHU Mei-yan, GU Xiao-he, SUN Lin, et al（束美艳, 顾晓鹤, 孙林, 等）. Scientia Agricultura Sinica（中国农业科学）, 2018, 51(18): 3486.
[4] JIA Xue-qin, FENG Mei-chen, YANG Wu-de, et al（贾学勤, 冯美臣, 杨武德, 等）. Chinese Journal of Ecology（生态学杂志）, 2018, 37(2): 424.
[5] LI Chan, WANG Jun-jie, WU Guo-feng, et al（李婵, 王俊杰, 邬国锋, 等）. Journal of Shenzhen University·Science and Engineering（深圳大学学报·理工版）, 2018, 35(3): 307.
[6] YANG Jun-wen, ZHANG Jin-shui, ZHU Xiu-fang, et al（杨珺雯, 张锦水, 朱秀芳, 等）. Journal of Beijing Normal University·Natural Science（北京师范大学学报·自然科学版）, 2015, 51(S1): 82.
[7] SHAO Qi, CHEN Yun-hao, YANG Shu-ting, et al（邵琦, 陈云浩, 杨淑婷, 等）. Geography and Geo-Information Science（地理与地理信息科学）, 2019, 35(5): 34.
[8] YASENJIANG Kahaer, NIJAT Kasim, NIGARA Tashpola, et al(亚森江·喀哈尔, 尼加提·卡斯木, 尼格拉·塔什甫拉提). Journal of Wheat Crops(麦类作物学报), 2019, 39(2): 225.
[9] WU Wen-li, YUAN Ye, LI Yuan-yuan, et al（武文丽, 袁也, 李园园, 等）. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences（新疆农业科学）, 2020, 57(1): 149.
[10] WU Hong-qi, FAN Yan-min, JIN Gui-li, et al（武红旗, 范燕敏, 靳瑰丽, 等）. Pratacultural Science（草业科学）, 2019, 36(7): 1765.
[11] CAO Xiao-ming, FENG Yi-ming, SHI Jian-kang, et al（曹晓明, 冯益明, 史建康, 等）. Journal of Northeast Forestry University（东北林业大学学报）, 2020, 48(1): 56.
[12] WEI Huai-dong, CHEN Fang, ZHANG Bo, et al（魏怀东, 陈芳, 张勃, 等）. Pratacultural Science（草业科学）, 2018, 35(3): 590.
[13] JIANG Li, ZHU Chang-fu, YU Ting-ting, et al（姜立, 朱长甫, 于婷婷, 等）. SHENGWU HUAGONG（生物化工）, 2020, 6(6): 136.
[14] BAI Juan, GONG Chun-mei, WANG Gang, et al（白娟, 龚春梅, 王刚, 等）. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica（西北植物学报）, 2010, 30(12): 2444.
[15] YANG Hong-fei, LI Jian-long, MU Shao-jie, et al（杨红飞, 李建龙, 穆少杰, 等）. Acta Prataculturae Sinica（草业学报）, 2012, 21(6): 258.