|
|
|
|
|
|
| Tomato Maturity Classification Based on Spatially Resolved Spectra |
| HUANG Yu-ping1,3, Renfu Lu2, QI Chao1, CHEN Kun-jie1* |
1. College of Engineering, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210031, China
2. United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service (USDA/ARS), Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
3. Department of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA |
|
|
|
|
Abstract A multichannel hyperspectral imaging probe with 30 optic fibers covering the wavelength range of 550～1 650 nm and the light source-detector distances of 1.5～36 mm was recently developed for property and quality assessment of food products. Spatially resolved spectra were acquired using the new developed multichannel probe for 600 “Sun Bright” tomato fruit, which were grouped into six maturity grades (i.e., green, breaker, turning, pink, light red, red), based on their internal color distributions. Partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLSDA) and support vector machine discriminant analysis (SVMDA) models for the 15 spatially resolved spectra were developed and compared to determine the optimal models for classification of tomato maturity. The results showed that for PLSDA models, SR spectra 15 gave the best classification results with the accuracy of 81.3%, while for SVMDA models, SR spectra 10 had the best accuracy of 86.3%. Overall, SVMDA models will provide better performance than PLSDA models for tomato maturity classification. Moreover, spatially resolved spectra with larger source-detector distances could offer better classification results, which suggests that spatially resolved spectra has potential for measuring fruit and vegetables quality.
|
|
Received: 2017-08-16
Accepted: 2017-12-22
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
CHEN Kun-jie
E-mail: kunjiechen@njau.edu.cn
|
|
[1] Zhu Q, He C, Lu R, et al. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2015，103: 27.
[2] Xie L, Ying Y, Ying T, et al. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2017, 584(2): 379.
[3] Dorais M, Ehret D L，Papadopoulos A P. Phytochemistry Reviews, 2008, 7(2): 231.
[4] Qin J, Lu R. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2008, 49(3): 355.
[5] Arefi A, Motlagh A M, Mollazade K，et al. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 2011, 5(10): 1144.
[6] Tiwari G, Slaughter D C，Cantwell M. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2013, 86: 221.
[7] Sirisomboon P, Tanaka M, Kojima T, et al. Journal of Food Engineering, 2012, 112(3): 218.
[8] Clément A, Dorais M，Vernon M. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2018, 56(5): 1538.
[9] Gómez A H, Hu G, Wang J, et al. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2006, 54(1): 44.
[10] Yibin Z, Jun W. Transactions of The Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2015, 4: 25.
[11] Zhang L，McCarthy M J. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2012，67: 37.
[12] Qin J, Chao K, Kim M S. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2012，71: 21.
[13] Polder G, van der Heijden G W，Young I. Transactions of the ASAE, 2002, 45(4): 1155.
[14] Clément A, Dorais M, Vernon M. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2008, 56(21): 9813.
[15] Peiris K, Dull G, Leffler R，et al. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 1998, 123(6): 1089.
[16] Saad A G, Jaiswal P，Jha S N. International Journal of Advanced Research, 2014, 2(12): 632.
[17] USDA. U.S. Standards for Grades of Fresh Tomatoes. United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Washington DC, 1991.
[18] Huang Y, Lu R，Chen K. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2017，133: 88. |
| [1] |
YUAN Wei-dong1, 2, JU Hao2, JIANG Hong-zhe1, 2, LI Xing-peng2, ZHOU Hong-ping1, 2*, SUN Meng-meng1, 2. Classification of Different Maturity Stages of Camellia Oleifera Fruit
Using Hyperspectral Imaging Technique[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3419-3426. |
| [2] |
KANG Ming-yue1, 3, WANG Cheng1, SUN Hong-yan3, LI Zuo-lin2, LUO Bin1*. Research on Internal Quality Detection Method of Cherry Tomatoes Based on Improved WOA-LSSVM[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3541-3550. |
| [3] |
CHEN Xiao-li1, LI You-li1, LI Wei3, WANG Li-chun1, GUO Wen-zhong1, 2*. Effects of Red and Blue LED Lighting Modes on Spectral Characteristics and Coloring of Tomato Fruit[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(06): 1809-1814. |
| [4] |
WANG Dong1, 2, FENG Hai-zhi3, LI Long3, HAN Ping1, 2*. Compare of the Quantitative Models of SSC in Tomato by Two Types of NIR Spectrometers[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(05): 1351-1357. |
| [5] |
CUI Tian-yu1, LU Zhong-ling1, 2, XUE Lin3, WAN Shi-qi1, 2, ZHAO Ke-xin1, 2, WANG Hai-hua1, 2*. Research on the Rapid Detection Model of Tomato Sugar Based on
Near-Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(04): 1218-1224. |
| [6] |
HE Lu1, WAN Li2, GAO Hui-yi2*. Recognition of Drought Stress in Tomato Based on Hyperspectral Imaging[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(03): 724-730. |
| [7] |
JIA Meng-meng, YIN Yong*, YU Hui-chun, YUAN Yun-xia, WANG Zhi-hao. Hyperspectral Imaging Combined With Feature Wavelength Screening for Monitoring the Quality Change of Tomato During Storage[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(03): 969-975. |
| [8] |
HU Zheng1, ZHANG Yan1, 2*. Effect of Dimensionality Reduction and Noise Reduction on Hyperspectral Recognition During Incubation Period of Tomato Early Blight[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(03): 744-752. |
| [9] |
GAO Rong-hua1, 2, FENG Lu1, 2*, ZHANG Yue3, YUAN Ji-dong3, WU Hua-rui1, 2, GU Jing-qiu1, 2. Early Detection of Tomato Gray Mold Disease With Multi-Dimensional Random Forest Based on Hyperspectral Image[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(10): 3226-3234. |
| [10] |
ZHANG Fu1, 2, 3, WANG Xin-yue2, CUI Xia-hua2, CAO Wei-hua2, ZHANG Xiao-dong1*, ZHANG Ya-kun2. Classification of Qianxi Tomatoes by Visible/Near Infrared Spectroscopy Combined With GMO-SVM[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(10): 3291-3297. |
| [11] |
LIU Qiang1, LIU Shao-bo1, 2, LU Xue-song1, 2*, FAN Jun-jia1, 2, TIAN Hua1, 2, MA Xing-zhi1, 2, GUI Li-li1, 2. Research Progress in the Application of Raman Spectroscopy in Petroleum Geology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(09): 2679-2688. |
| [12] |
JI Jiang-tao1, 2, LI Peng-ge1, JIN Xin1, 2*, MA Hao1, 2, LI Ming-yong1. Study on Quantitative Detection of Tomato Seedling Robustness
in Spring Seedling Transplanting Period Based on VIS-NIR
Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(06): 1741-1748. |
| [13] |
YANG Sheng-hui, ZHENG Yong-jun*, LIU Xing-xing*, ZHANG Tian-gang, ZHANG Xiao-shuan, XU Li-ming. Cabernet Gernischt Maturity Determination Based on Near-Ground Multispectral Figures by Using UAVs[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(10): 3220-3226. |
| [14] |
ZHANG Xu1, ZHANG Tian-gang2, MU Wei-song1, FU Ze-tian2,3, ZHANG Xiao-shuan2,3*. Prediction of Soluble Solids Content for Wine Grapes During Maturing Based on Visible and Near-Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(01): 229-235. |
| [15] |
LI Meng-yao1, 2, WANG Shu-ya1, XIE Yun-feng1, LIU Yun-guo3*, ZHAI Chen1*. Detection of Protease Deterioration Factor in Tomato by Fluorescence Sensor Array[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(11): 3477-3482. |
|
|
|
|
