Prediction for Soil Water Content Based on Variable Preferred and Extreme Learning Machine Algorithm
CAI Liang-hong1, 2, DING Jian-li1, 2*
1. College of Resources & Environmental Science, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China
2. Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China
Abstract：The rapid estimation of soil moisture content (SMC) is of great significance to precision agriculture in arid areas, and hyperspectral remote sensing technology had been widely used in the estimation of soil moisture content due to its non-destructive, rapid, and high spectral resolution characteristics. Meanwhile, there are many prediction models of soil moisture content, such as BP, SVM, RF and so on, but the prediction model has some shortcomings. Recently, the extreme learning machine(ELM) as a new algorithm began to emerge in the field of soil property prediction. In the present study, a total of 39 soil samples at 0～20 cm depth were collected from delta oasis in Weigan-Kuqain, Xinjiang Province. We brought back to the laboratory to dry it naturally, groundnd and passed through a 2 mm hole scree, and then the sample holders were clear black boxs in 12 cm diameter and 1.8 cm deep, which were filled and leveled at the rim with a spatula. Reflectance of soil samples were measured using ASD Fieldspec 3 Spectrometer in a dark room. We used the following steps to process soil reflectance: First, discrete wavelet transformation (DWT) was used to decompose the original spectral in 8 levels using db4 wavelet basis by MATLAB programming language. In order to select the maximum level of DWT, correlation coefficients between SMC and the spectra of each level was computed. Secondly, On the basis of wavelet transform, CARS (the adaptive variable weighting algorithm)，SPA (successive projections algorithm) and CARS-SPA were used to filter the redundant variables, the wavelength variables with better correlation with SMC were screened out. Thirdly, On the basis of the preferred wavelengths, BP neural network，SVM (support vector machine)，RF (random forest) and ELM (extreme learning machine) prediction models were employed to build the hyperspectral estimation models of SMC, and the advantages and disadvantages of the model were further analyzed. Statistical parameters of root mean square error of calibration (RMSEC)，determination coefficient of calibration (R2c)，root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP)，determination coefficient of predicting (R2p) and relative prediction deviation (RPD) were selected as comparison criteria. The results showed that: (1) With the increase of the number of decomposed layers, the correlation between soil reflectance and SMC showed a trend of increasing first and then decreasing, and L6 was the most significant band at 0.01 level. In general, the characteristic spectrum of L6 was denoised at the same time, and the spectral detail was preserved to the maximum extent. So the maximum decomposition order of the wavelet was 6 order decomposition; (2) On the basis of L6, the CARS, SPA and CARS-SPA algorithms were used to optimize the variables, and the number of selected wavelength variables were 81, 23 and 12, respectively. The predictive models constructed by three algorithms were better than those of the whole-band model. The prediction model based on the CARS-SPA was the most accurate in the corresponding model. It can be seen that the CARS-SPA coupling algorithm not only simplified the model complexity, but also increased the robustness of the model; (3) Compared with the BP，SVM，RF and ELM, In all the SMC predicting models, there were 6 models with predictive ability, Sort by: L6-CARS-SPA-ELM>L6-CARS-SPA-RF>L6-CARS-ELM>L6-CARS-RF>L6-SPA-ELM>L6-SPA-RF. Results showed that ELM performed much better than BP, SVM and RF in predicting SMC in this study. At the same time, the L6-CARS-SPA-ELM model had the highest accuracy, and the model had RMSEC=0.015 1，R2c=0.916 6，RMSEP=0.014 2，R2p=0.935 4，RPD=2.323 9. It was shown that the combination of wavelet transform and CARS-SPA algorithm made it possible to remove the noise as much as possible and to remove the noise completely when the model was established. At the same time, and ELM model was a new method to predict other soil properties.
蔡亮红，丁建丽. 基于变量优选和ELM算法的土壤含水量预测研究[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2018, 38(07): 2209-2214.
CAI Liang-hong, DING Jian-li. Prediction for Soil Water Content Based on Variable Preferred and Extreme Learning Machine Algorithm. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 38(07): 2209-2214.
[1] ZOU Wen-xiu, HAN Xiao-zeng, JIANG Heng, et al(邹文秀, 韩晓增, 江 恒, 等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2011, 27(9): 196.
[2] ZHANG Ding-hai, LI Xin-rong, CHEN Yong-le(张定海, 李新荣, 陈永乐). Acta Ecologica Sinica(生态学报), 2016, 36(11): 3273.
[3] SUN Yue-jun, ZHENG Xiao-po, QIN Qi-ming, et al(孙越君, 郑小坡, 秦其明, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2015，35(8): 2236.
[4] Yin Z, Lei T, Yan Q, et al. Computers & Electronics in Agriculture, 2013, 99(99): 101.
[5] YU Lei, ZHU Ya-xing, HONG Yong-sheng, et al(于 雷，朱亚星，洪永胜，等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2016, 32(22): 138.
[6] CAI Liang-hong, DING Jian-li(蔡亮红, 丁建丽). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2017, 33(16)：144.
[7] GUO Yan, HOU Su-zhen, WANG Ping, et al(郭 彦，侯素珍，王 平，等). Arid Zone Research(干旱区研究), 2015, 32(6): 1047.
[8] Kaewpijit S, Moigne J L, Elghazawi T. Proceedings of SPIE-The International Society for Optical Engineering, 2002, 388(4): 56.
[9] ZHANG Chu, LIU Fei, KONG Wen-wen, et al(张 初, 刘 飞, 孔汶汶, 等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2013, 29(20): 270.
[10] WANG Tong-tong, ZHANG Jian, TU Chuan, et al(王彤彤, 张 剑, 涂 川, 等). Environmental Science & Technology(环境科学与技术), 2013，36(8): 175.
[11] ZHANG Qiang, HUANG Sheng-zhi, CHEN Xiao-hong(张 强，黄生志，陈晓宏). Acta Pedologica Sinice(土壤学报), 2013, 50(1): 59.
[12] Guo P T, Li M F, Luo W, et al. Geoderma, 2015, 237-238: 49.
[13] Cambria E, Liu Q, Li K, et al. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 2013, 28(6): 30.
[14] Deng C W, Huang G B, Jia X U, et al. Science China, 2015, 58(2): 20301.
[15] XUE Li-hong, ZHOU Ding-hao, LI Ying, et al(薛利红, 周鼎浩, 李 颖, 等). Acta Pedologica Sinica(土壤学报), 2014, 51(5): 993.
