Abstract:Innovation of conventional spectrometers is of actual technical and economical value. It is also an important way to accelerate the development of spectroscopic instruments. When improving a conventional spectrometer, its dispersion part is pivotal, because it is decisive to the basic performance of the spectrometer. In the present paper, the typical dispersion parts of conventional spectrometers are compared to feature them and find the evolution force among them. The basic characters of the dispersion parts, including spectral range, dispersion power, resolution and throughput, are compared separately and comprehensively by reviewing their decisive factor, formula and typical data. The results not only conclude the feature and the complementariness of the dispersion parts, but also indicate that the trade-off between resolution and throughput is ubiquitous in traditional spectrometers. Further reviewing from this point, the evolution history of traditional spectrometers shows that the conflict between resolution and throughput is an important evolution force. This is a new way to understand the evolution of traditional spectrometers. Moreover, dealing with the trade-off between resolution and throughput correctly will help to analyze and settle the core problem of spectrometers.
杨怀栋,陈科新,黄星月,何庆声,金国藩 . 常规光谱仪器分光系统的比较[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2009, 29(06): 1707-1712.
YANG Huai-dong, CHEN Ke-xin, HUANG Xing-yue, HE Qing-sheng, JIN Guo-fan . Comparison of Dispersion Parts of Conventional Spectrometers. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2009, 29(06): 1707-1712.
[1] Thorne U,Litzen S Johansson. Spectrophysics: Principles and Applications. Berlin, New York: Springer, 1999. 22. [2] LIN Zhong, FAN Shi-fu(林 中,范世福). Spectroscopic Instrumentology(光谱仪器学). Beijing: Machine Industry Press(北京:机械工业出版社), 1989. [3] Vidi Saptari. Fourier Transform Spectroscopy Instrumentation Engineering, Bellingham, WA: SPIE Optical Engineering Press, 2004. [4] Mielenz K D. JOSA, 1967, 57(1):66. [5] Anne P Thorne. Spectrophysics. London: Chapman and Hall, 1988. [6] Becker-Ross Helmut, Florek Stefan, Franken Helmut, et al. JAAS, 2000,15(7):851. [7] Iwata Tetsuo, Koshoubu Jun. Applied Spectroscopy, 52 (7), 1998: 1008. [8] Martin Harwit, Neil J A Sloane. Hadamard Transform Optics. New York: Academic Press, 1979. 5. [9] Riesenberg R, Nitzsche G, Voigt W. Hadamard Encoding and Other Optical Multiplexing. VDI-Berichte 1694, 2002. 345. [10] Rust Jennifer A, Nobrega Joaquim A, Calloway Jr. Clifton P, et al. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy, 2005, 60(5): 589. [11] Utter S B, Lopez-Urrutia J R C, Beiersdorfer P, et al. Rev. Sci. Instru., 2002, 73(11): 3737. [12] Magnan Pierre. Detection of Visible Photons in CCD and CMOS: A Comparative View. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 2003, 5(1-3): 199. [13] Demtroder W. Laser Spectroscopy: Basic Concepts and Instrumentation/Wolfgang Demtroder. Berlin; New York: Springer, 2003. [14] Bacon C P, Mattley Y, DeFrece R. Rev. Sci. Instru., 2004, 75(1): 1. [15] Wolffenbuttel R F. IEEE Transactions On Instrumentation and Measurement, 2004, 53(1): 197. [16] Daly James T, Johnson Edward A, Bodkin Andrew, et al. Proc. SPIE, 2000, 3953: 70. [17] Delage Andre, Bidnyk Serge, Cheben Pavel, et al. Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks, 2004, 2: 78. [18] ZHANG Zhan-xia, LIU Hong-tao, HE Jia-yao(张展霞,刘洪涛,何家耀). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2000, 20(2): 160. [19] Eid E S. Proceedings of the Eighteenth National Radio Science Conference, 2001, 1(27-29): 15.