北京市区绿色空间滞尘分布反演研究

doi:10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2022)08-2572-07

摘要
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (3518 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要：北京市作为中国政治中心和京津冀特大型城市，近40年来城市化进程迅速，大气颗粒物和尘埃粒子污染问题较为突出，发挥绿色空间滞尘功能具有重要现实意义。将高光谱技术与遥感技术相结合，反演了市域尺度绿色空间滞尘分布。以北京市区绿色空间常见植被大叶黄杨(Euonymus japonicus)为研究对象，通过室外采样与室内试验获取叶片样本的滞尘量、光谱反射率和叶面积等数据，比较叶片滞尘前后的原始光谱曲线和反射率一阶导数特征，分析不同滞尘量对光谱反射率的影响，探究对叶片滞尘量高度敏感的波段。利用光谱响应函数将地面采集的窄波段光谱反射率数据分别转化遥感卫星的宽波段光谱反射率数据，建立对应卫星波段植被指数比值与滞尘量的回归模型，选取拟合效果最好的回归模型作为滞尘反演模型。结合GF-2影像所提取北京市区绿色空间范围，采用滞尘反演模型获取北京市区绿色空间滞尘分布。进而插值得到北京市区尘埃污染分布，采用空间自相关模型检验其空间聚集特性。结果表明：740~1 870 nm波段, 滞尘后光谱反射率明显低于滞尘前反射率，滞尘对红边、黄边、蓝边位置没有明显影响，对“红边幅值”和“红边面积”影响较明显，利用Sentinel-2影像计算的EVI指数与滞尘量相关性最高，所构建的线性与二次滞尘回归模型决定系数(R²)分别为0.705和0.751；利用2021年4月7日和2021年6月3日的Sentinel-2影像反演获取了北京市区绿色空间滞尘分布，其滞尘分布趋势表现为：市中心高于郊区，北部高于南部，东部高于西部。北京市区中部、北部和东部易产生尘埃污染。污染分布具有明显聚集性，并非完全随机。

关键词：北京市；绿色空间；光谱特征；遥感反演；空间自相关

Abstract：As the political center of China and a super large city of Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei, the urbanization process of Beijing has been rapid in the past 40 years, and the pollution problems of atmospheric particles and dust particles are prominent. It is of great practical significance to play the role of green space dust retention. This paper combines hyperspectral technology and remote sensing technology to retrieve the urban scale green space dust distribution. This study selected Euonymus japonicus, a common green space vegetation in Beijing, as the research object. The dust retention capacity, spectral reflectance and leaf area of leaf samples were obtained through outdoor sampling and indoor experiments. The original spectral curve and the first derivative of reflectance before and after dust retention were compared, and the effects of different dust retention on spectral reflectance were analyzed, To explore the band which is highly sensitive to dust retention of leaves. Using the spectral response function, the narrow band spectral reflectance data collected on the ground are transformed into the wide band spectral reflectance data of remote sensing satellite. The regression model of vegetation index ratio and dust retention capacity of corresponding satellite band is established. The regression model with the best fitting effect is selected as the dust retention inversion model. Combined with the green space range extracted from the GF-2 image, the dust retention distribution of Beijing urban green space was obtained using the dust retention inversion model. The spatial autocorrelation model is used to test the spatial aggregation characteristics. The results show that: in the 740~1 870 nm band, the spectral reflectance after dust retention is significantly lower than before dust retention. Dust retention has no obvious effect on the position of the red edge, yellow edge and blue edge but has pronounced effect on the “red edge amplitude” and “red edge area”. EVI index calculated by Sentinel-2 image has the highest correlation with dust retention. The coefficients of determination (R²) of the linear and quadratic regression models are 0.705 and 0.751, respectively. Based on the Sentinel-2 images on April 7, 2021, and June 3, 2021, the distribution trend of green space dust retention in the Beijing urban area is as follows: the city center is higher than the suburbs, the north is higher than the south, and the East is higher than the West. The central, northern and eastern parts of Beijing are prone to dust pollution. The pollution distribution is aggregated and not completely random.

Key words：Beijing; Green space; Spectral characteristics; Remote sensing inversion; Spatial autocorrelation

收稿日期: 2021-07-07 修订日期: 2021-11-03

中图分类号:

S715

基金资助: 国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(42001211)资助

通讯作者: 于强 E-mail: yuqiang@bjfu.edu.cn

作者简介: 王戈，1995年生，北京林业大学林学院博士研究生 e-mail: GlennW0912@bjfu.edu.cn

引用本文:

王戈，于强，Yang Di，牛腾，龙芊芊. 北京市区绿色空间滞尘分布反演研究[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2022, 42(08): 2572-2578.
WANG Ge, YU Qiang, Yang Di, NIU Teng, LONG Qian-qian. Retrieval of Dust Retention Distribution in Beijing Urban Green Space Based on Spectral Characteristics. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(08): 2572-2578.

链接本文:

https://www.gpxygpfx.com/CN/10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2022)08-2572-07 或 https://www.gpxygpfx.com/CN/Y2022/V42/I08/2572

[1] Chen M, Dai F, Yang B, et al. Building and Environment, 2019, 158: 1.
[2] Jayasooriya V M, Ng A W M, Muthukumaran S, et al. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2017, 21: 34.
[3] WANG Hui-xia, SHI Hui, LI Yang-yang(王会霞，石辉，李秧秧). Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology(应用生态学报), 2010, 21 (12): 3077.
[4] JIA Yan, WU Chao, DONG Chun-fang, et al(贾彦，吴超，董春芳，等). Journal of Central South University·Science and Technology(中南大学学报·自然科学版), 2012, 43(11): 4547.
[5] GAO Jun-liang, ZHANG Jing-bo, SUN Fei, et al(高君亮，张景波，孙非，等). Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment(干旱区资源和环境), 2013, 27(8): 176.
[6] LUO Na-na, ZHAO Wen-ji, YAN Xing, et al(罗娜娜，赵文吉，晏星，等). Ecology and Environment(生态环境学报), 2013, 22(6): 1025.
[7] XIE Ying-zan, HE Ping, FANG Wen, et al(谢英赞，何平，方文，等). Journal of Southwest China Normal University·Natural Science Edition(西南师范大学学报·自然科学版), 2014, 39(1): 97.
[8] ZHU Ji-you, HE Wei-jun, WANG Hong-qiang, et al(朱济友，何韦均，王洪强，等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2020, 40(5): 1620.
[9] ZHOU Zhi-xiang, SHAO Tian-yi, TANG Wan-peng, et al(周志翔，邵天一，唐万鹏，等). Acta Ecologica Sinica(生态学报), 2004, (2): 186.
[10] LIU Wen-ping, YU Zhen-rong(刘文平，宇振荣). Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology(应用生态学报), 2016, 27(8): 2580.
[11] Ciro D V, Barriga J E C, Rincón I C H. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2021, 193(7): 1.
[12] Jeanjean A P R, Monks P S, Leigh R J. Atmospheric Environment, 2016, 147: 1.
[13] WANG Juan, MA Lü-yi, WANG Xin-jie, et al(王娟，马履一，王新杰，等). Journal of Northweat Forestry University(西北林学院学报), 2010, 25(4): 195.
[14] HAN Yi, LI Ji-yue, GUO Lian-sheng, et al(韩轶，李吉跃，郭连生，等). Journal of Beijing Forestry University(北京林业大学学报), 2002, 24(4): 102.
[15] ZHAO Hai-xia, WANG Shu-fen, MENG Fei, et al(赵海霞，王淑芬，孟菲，等). Acta Ecologica Sinica(生态学报), 2020, 40(21): 7861.
[16] LEI Jin-rui, CHEN Zong-zhu, WU Ting-tian, et al(雷金睿，陈宗铸，吴庭天，等). Acta Ecologica Sinica(生态学报), 2019, 39(7): 2366.