厦漳地区原水DOM的3-DEEM-FRI表征与分析研究

doi:10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2021)02-0499-06

摘要
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (3292 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要：采用三维荧光光谱结合荧光区域积分分析法（3DEEM-FRI）研究了厦漳地区江东泵站、北溪水闸、汀溪水库、莲花水库、坂头水库以及石兜水库原水中溶解性有机物（DOM）的荧光特性、污染特征及其他水质指标与各荧光区域积分体积之间的相关性。结果表明，三种荧光组分—荧光类蛋白质组分（组分Ⅰ，C1）、荧光类蛋白质组分（组分Ⅱ，C2）以及类富里酸组分（组分Ⅲ，C3）在所调查水样中均有显著检出，而溶解性微生物代谢产物组分（组分Ⅳ，C4）在莲花、坂头以及石兜水样中有检出，类腐殖酸组分（组分Ⅴ，C5）在所调查水样中检出不明显；不同水体中同一组分的相对含量差别不大，其中荧光类蛋白质组分占比（P_{1, n}+P_{2, n}）均在60%以上，组分Ⅲ（P_{3, n}）与组分Ⅳ占比（P_{4, n}）均在10%～20%之间，组分Ⅴ占比（P_{5, n}）小于6%；荧光特征参数（1.28β∶α<0.97）显示水体中DOM具有典型的陆源与自生源混合输入的污染特征，组分Ⅰ、组分Ⅱ与组分Ⅳ之间具有同源性特征；TOC与总标准荧光积分体积（Ф_T，n）之间具显著的相关性（R²=0.979 34），NH⁺₄-N与组分Ⅳ的标准荧光积分体积（Ф_4，n）之间相关性较好（R²=0.827 98），而类腐殖质的相对含量（P_{3, n}+P_{5, n}）与SUVA之间的R²为0.703 25。研究表明，3DEEM-FRI分析法可用于识别江湖水库型原水DOM的组成及污染来源，同时还可以实现对TOC含量、NH⁺₄-N含量以及水体腐殖化程度的有效追踪和指示。

关键词：DOM; 三维荧光区域积分; 荧光特征参数; TOC; NH⁺₄-N

Abstract：3-DEEM fluorescence spectroscopy and original fluorescence integration (3DEEM-FRI) analysis were adopted to analyze the correlation between the normalized fluorescent integral volumes and the fluorescence characteristics of the dissolved organic matter (DOM) in the raw water from reservoirs in Xiamen and Zhangzhou. The results showed that the components of aromatic protein (Component Ⅰ, C1 and Component Ⅱ, C2) and the fulvic acid (Component Ⅲ, C3) were significantly detected in all water samples. The component of soluble microbial metabolites (Component Ⅳ, C4) were detected in the water sample of Lianhua reservoir, Bantou reservoir and Shidou reservoir, while the component of humic acid (Component Ⅴ, C5) were not found obviously in any of the water samples. The relative contents of the same component are similar in different water samples. The proportion of aromatic protein components (P_{1, n}+P_{2, n}) is larger than 60%. The proportion of fulvic acid components (P_{3, n}) is between 10% and 20%, as well as microbial metabolites components (P_{4, n}), while the proportion of humic acid components (P_{5, n}) is lower than 6%. The fluorescence characteristic parameters (1.28β∶α<0.97) demonstrated that the sources of DOM had typical pollution characteristics of mixed input from terrestrial and autogenous, and there is a homology between the CⅠ, CⅡ and CⅣ. The linear relation ship between TOC and the total normalized fluorescent integral volumes (Ф_{T, n}) is significant (R²=0.979 34), and NH⁺₄-N showed good correlation with the normalized fluorescent integral volumes of microbial metabolites components (Ф_{4, n})(R²=0.827 98). The R² between the (P_{3, n}+P_{5, n}) and SUVA are 0.703 25. This study demonstrated that 3-DEEM-FRI analysis could not only be used to analyze the compositions and pollutant source of the DOM, but also track and indicate the contents of TOC, NH⁺₄-N and the humification degree of raw water effectively.

Key words：DOM; 3-DEEM-FRI; Fluorescence characteristic parameters; TOC; NH⁺₄-N

收稿日期: 2019-12-26 修订日期: 2020-04-05

中图分类号:

X-524

基金资助: 国家自然科学基金项目（51878582，41801219），福建省自然科学基金项目（2017J01491），福建省高校新世纪优秀人才支持计划项目（JA14227），福建省教育厅中青年教师教育科研项目（JAT190652）资助

通讯作者: 李青松 E-mail: leetsingsong@sina.com

作者简介: 陈彦洁，1994年生，青岛大学环境科学与工程学院硕士研究生 e-mail: 916790665@qq.com

引用本文:

陈彦洁，崔育倩，李青松，李博强，王吉苹，陈国元，廖杰，李国新. 厦漳地区原水DOM的3-DEEM-FRI表征与分析研究[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2021, 41(02): 499-504.
CHEN Yan-jie, CUI Yu-qian, LI Qing-song, LI Bo-qiang, WANG Ji-ping, CHEN Guo-yuan, LIAO Jie, LI Guo-xin. Characterization and Analysis of DOM in Raw Water in Xiamen and Zhangzhou by 3-DEEM-FRI. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(02): 499-504.

链接本文:

https://www.gpxygpfx.com/CN/10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2021)02-0499-06 或 https://www.gpxygpfx.com/CN/Y2021/V41/I02/499

[1] Sadiq R, Rodriguez M J. Journal of Environmental Management, 2004, 73(1): 1.
[2] Li A Z, Zhao X, Mao R, et al. Journal of Hazardous Materials，2014, 271: 228.
[3] Verdugo P, Alldredge A L, Azam F, et al. Marine Chemistry, 2004，92(1-4): 67.
[4] WEI Qun-shan, LUO Zhuan-xi, CHEN Qiang, et al（魏群山，罗专溪，陈强，等）. Research of Environmental Science（环境科学研究）, 2010，23(10): 1229.
[5] Hao R, Ren H Q, Li J B, et al. Water Research, 2012, 46(17): 5765.
[6] Henderson R K, Baker A, Murphy K R, et al. Water Research, 2009, 43(4): 863.
[7] LIU Li-zhen, HUANG Qi, WU Yong-ming, et al(刘丽贞，黄琪，吴永明，等). China Environmental Science（中国环境科学），2018, 38(1): 293.
[8] Chen W, Westerhoff P, Leenheer J A, et al. Environmental Sciense & Thchnology, 2003, 37: 5701.
[9] Baker A. Environmental Science & Technology, 2001, 35(5): 948.
[10] WANG Man-lin, XI Bei-dou, XU Qi-gong, et al（王曼霖，习北斗，许其功，等）. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis（光谱学与光谱分析）, 2012，32(9): 2477.
[11] WANG Cong-ying, CHEN Wei, TAO Hui, et al(王聪颖，陈卫，陶辉，等). Water Purification Technology(净水技术), 2019, 38(3): 56.
[12] SUI Zhi-nan, ZHI Er-quan, YAO Jie, et al（隋志男，郅二铨，姚杰，等）. Journal of Environmrntal Engineering Technology（环境工程技术学报）, 2015, 5(2): 114.
[13] Holland A, Stauber J, Wood C M, et al. Water Research, 2018, 137: 184.
[14] Pifer A D, Fairey J L. Water Research, 2012, 46(9): 2927.
[15] Huguet A, Vacher L, Relexans S, et al. Organic Geochemistry, 2009, 40(6): 706.
[16] Weishaar J L, Aiken G R, Bergamaschi B A, et al. Environmental Science & Technology, 2003, 37(20): 4702.
[17] Wei Q, Wang D, Qiao C, et al. Environmental Monitoring & Assessment, 2008, 141(1-3): 347.
[18] LI Xiao-jie, GAO Hong-jie, GUO Ji-feng, et al（李晓洁，高红杰，郭冀峰，等）. China Environmental Science（中国环境科学），2018, 38(1): 311.
[19] Williams C J, Yamashita Y, Wilson H F, et al. Limnology & Oceanography, 2010, 55(3): 1159.
[20] Inamdar S, Finger N, Singh S, et al. USA Biogeochemistry, 2012, 108(1-3): 55.
[21] Zuo X, He H, et al. IOP Conference Series. Earth and Environmental Science, 2018, 108: 22031.