光谱学与光谱分析 |
|
|
|
|
|
Comparison of NO2 Slant Columns Between Two Ground-Based MAX-DOAS |
XU Jin1, XIE Pin-hua1*, SI Fu-qi1, LI Ang1, DOU Ke1, LIU Wen-qing1, Yugo Kanaya2, Hitoshi Irie2 |
1. Key Laboratory of Environmental Optical & Technology, Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Hefei 230031, China 2. Frontier Research Center for Global Change, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, 3173-25 Showa-Machi, Kanazawa-Ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 236-0001, Japan |
|
|
Abstract The study of comparison of NO2 SCD between two ground-based multi axis DOAS is introduced. The slant columns of NO2 from JAMASTEC are compared with those of AIOFM during the period from November to 31 December 2009. It says that the more signal to noise ratio is obtained by using the adjusted integral time rather than fixed settings; Two instrument show good accordance in the lower viewing angles, with the correlation coefficient of 0.995, but it becomes bad with higher viewing angles. The low deviation between the two instruments was achieved during the period from 9am to 17pm, the results in the 20 degree direction show best agreement with a deviation of 12%, but in other period the deviation becomes larger. The results in the visible range are better than those in the UV range, the residual in the fit decreases by more than 60%, and the results in the visible range show good agreements with those of AIOFM in the UV range during the whole day.
|
Received: 2011-04-01
Accepted: 2011-08-09
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
XIE Pin-hua
E-mail: phxie@aiofm.ac.cn
|
|
[1] Miller H L, Weaver A, Sanders R W, et al. Tellus B, 1997, 49(5): 496. [2] Friedeburg C, Pundt I, Mettendorf K U, et al. Atmospheric Environment, 2005, 39(5): 977. [3] Hnninger G,Platt U. Atmospheric Environment, 2002, 36(15): 2481. [4] Irie H, Kanaya Y, Akimoto H, et al. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 2009, 9:2741. [5] Li X, Brauers T, Shao M, et al. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 2010, 10:2079. [6] Wagner T, Deutschmann T, Platt U. Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2009, 2:495. [7] Bobrowski N, Lohberger F, Hoenninger G, et al. American Geophysical Union, Fall meeting 2003, Abstract #V12E-05. [8] Fayt C, Van Roozendael M. WinDOAS 2.1 Software User Manual, 2001. [9] Vandaele A C, Hermans C, Simon P C, et al. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer.,1998, 59:171. [10] Greenblatt G D, Orlando J J, Burkholder J B, et al. J. Geophys. Res., 1990, 95: 18577. [11] Grainger J F,Ring J. Nature, 1962, 193: 762. |
[1] |
PU Gui-juan1, 2, CHENG Si-yang3*, LI Song-kui4, LÜ Jin-guang2, CHEN Hua5, MA Jian-zhong3. Spectral Inversion and Variation Characteristics of Tropospheric NO2
Column Density in Lhasa, Tibet[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(06): 1725-1730. |
[2] |
LI Chun-qiang1, 2, GAO Yong-gang1, 2, XU Han-qiu1, 2*. Cross Comparison Between Landsat New Land Surface Temperature
Product and the Corresponding MODIS Product[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(03): 940-948. |
[3] |
ZHAO Ran1, YANG Feng-yun1*, MENG Qing-yan2, 3, KANG Yu-peng2, 4, ZHENG Jia-yuan1, HU Xin-li2, YANG Hang2. Comparative Analysis of GF-1 and GF-6 WFV Images in Suspended
Matter Concentration Inversion in Dianchi Lake[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(01): 198-205. |
[4] |
YE Zhi-peng1, 2, 3, ZHAO Shu-nan4, LI Xun-feng1, 2, 3*, HUAI Xiu-lan1, 2, 3. Study on Reflection Characteristics of Completely Oxidized DZ125[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(01): 230-238. |
[5] |
LI Jia-wang, LIU Yan, ZHANG De-qing, YANG Yong-an, ZHANG Chuan-yun, LI Lun, SI Min-zhen*. Comparison and Analysis of IR Spectra of Four Dendrobium Species[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(10): 2989-2994. |
[6] |
WANG Chun-ling1, 2, SHI Kai-yuan1, 2, MING Xing3*, CONG Mao-qin3, LIU Xin-yue3, GUO Wen-ji3. A Comparative Study of the COD Hyperspectral Inversion Models in
Water Based on the Maching Learning[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(08): 2353-2358. |
[7] |
GAO Sha1, YUAN Xi-ping1, 3, GAN Shu1, 2*, HU Lin1, BI Rui1, LI Rao-bo1, LUO Wei-dong1. UAV Image Matching Method Integrating SIFT Algorithm and Detection Model Optimization[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(05): 1497-1503. |
[8] |
LI Ming1, 2, NI Long1, WANG Meng1, 2*, ZHU Zhong-xu1, YUAN Chuan-jun1, 2, WU Jian3*. Research Progress on Evaluating the Effects of Nanomaterial-Based Development of Latent Fingerprints[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(09): 2670-2680. |
[9] |
GUO Fei1, 2, XU Zhen3*, MA Hong-hong1, 2, LIU Xiu-jin1, 2, YANG Zheng1, 2, TANG Shi-qi1, 2. A Comparative Study of the Hyperspectral Inversion Models Based on the PCA for Retrieving the Cd Content in the Soil[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(05): 1625-1630. |
[10] |
LIU Hao-ran1, HU Qi-hou2*, TAN Wei2, SU Wen-jing3, CHEN Yu-jia2, ZHU Yi-zhi2, LIU Jian-guo2. Study of the Urban NO2 Distribution and Emission Assessment Based on Mobile MAX-DOAS Observations[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(01): 11-19. |
[11] |
SHEN Dun-pu1, LI Ming1, 2, YUAN Chuan-jun1, 2, YU Hai-feng1, WANG Meng1, 2*. The Quantification of the Contrast for Latent Fingerprint Development Based on Fluorescent Spectrometry[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(01): 91-97. |
[12] |
YI Ding-rong1, ZHAO Yan-li1, KONG Ling-hua2*, WANG Wen-qi1, HUANG Cai-hong1. Miniature Snapshot Narrow Band Multi-Spectral Imaging Technology for Cervical Cancer Screening[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(01): 157-161. |
[13] |
YE Fa-wang, WANG Jian-gang*, QIU Jun-ting, ZHANG Chuan. A Geological Application Oriented Comparison Research on Different Atmospheric Correction Methods for Airborne CASI-SASI Hyperspectral Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(09): 2677-2685. |
[14] |
WU Xiao-ping1, 2, XU Han-qiu1, 2*. Cross-Comparison between GF-2 PMS2 and ZY-3 MUX Sensor Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(01): 310-318. |
[15] |
CHENG Si-yang1, MA Jian-zhong1*, ZHOU Huai-gang2, JIN Jun-li3, LIU Yan4, DONG Fan2, ZHOU Li-yan2, YAN Peng1, 3. Spectral Inversion and Characteristics of NO2 Column Density at Shangdianzi Regional Atmospheric Background Station[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 38(11): 3470-3475. |
|
|
|
|