|
|
|
|
|
|
Prediction of Total Nitrogen Content in Brown Soil Based on Hyperspectral and Combined Prediction Model |
ZHANG Xiu-quan1, MA Shi-xing1, LI Zhi-wei2*, ZHENG De-cong1, SONG Hai-yan1 |
1. College of Agricultural Engineering, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu 030801, China
2. College of Information Science and Engineering, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu 030801, China
|
|
|
Abstract Accurately grasping the total nitrogen content of farmland soil is significant for evaluating soil fertility and applying nitrogen fertilizer reasonably. To comprehensively utilize the advantages of each single prediction Model, improve the overall prediction performance, reduce the variance of the model, and improve the robustness, this study takes farmland brown soil as the research object, and based on near-infrared and visible hyperspectral data, puts forward a Combined prediction model based on standard deviation. CPM was used to predict soil total nitrogen content. Savitzky-Golay smoothing and first-order differential transformation are applied to the original hyperspectral data, and a tree model is used for feature band extraction. Using five single prediction models, Decision Tree Regression (DTR) (Model 1), Gaussian Kernel Regression (GKR) (Model 2), Random Forest Regression (RF) (Model 3), LASSO Regression (Model 4), and Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) (Model 5), a combination prediction model is established through a linear combination of single prediction models. The results indicate that: (1) The weights of the five single prediction models in the combined prediction model are obtained by generalized reduced gradient optimization algorithm: ω*1=0.407,ω*2=0.378,ω*3=0.215,ω*4=0,ω*5=0; (2) For all data, the predictive effectiveness of five single prediction models and combined prediction models for predicting soil total nitrogen content is M, respectively M1=0.855,M2=0.856,M3=0.847,M4=0.785,M5=0.796,MCPM=0.880, compared to the maximum predictive validity of a single model, the predictive validity of the combination prediction model has increased by 2.924%; (3) For all data, the prediction accuracy and standard deviation of soil total nitrogen content based on five single prediction models and combined prediction models are E(A1)=0.924,σ(A1)=0.075,E(A2)=0.928,σ(A2)=0.077,E(A3)=0.923,σ(A3)=0.082,E(A4)=0.882,σ(A4)=0.109,E(A5)=0.889,σ(A5)=0.104,E(ACPM)=0.937,σ(ACPM)=0.066, compared to the maximum prediction accuracy of a single model, the combination prediction model has improved prediction accuracy by 0.970% and model stability by 12.000%, making it an optimal combination prediction model. The combined prediction model can effectively estimate the total nitrogen content of farmland brown soil based on visible-near-infrared spectral data and can provide a basis and reference for the rapid monitoring of the total nitrogen content of farmland soil.
|
Received: 2023-04-17
Accepted: 2023-09-21
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
LI Zhi-wei
E-mail: lizhiweitong@163.com
|
|
[1] Liu Jun, Cai Haotian, Chen Shan, et al. Agriculture, 2023, 13(4):743.
[2] ZHOU Yang, ZHAO Xiao-min, GUO Xi(周 洋, 赵小敏, 郭 熙). Acta Pedologica Sinica(土壤学报), 2022, 59(2):451.
[3] Bai Zijin, Xie Modong, Hu Bifeng, et al. Sensors, 2022, 22(16):6124.
[4] ZHANG Yao, CUI Yun-tian, DENG Qiu-zhuo, et al(张 瑶, 崔云天, 邓秋卓, 等). Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery(农业机械学报),2021,52(S1):310.
[5] CHEN Wei, XU Zhan-jun, GUO Qi(陈 玮,徐占军,郭 琦). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2022, 38(8):9.
[6] Zhang Xianglin, Xue Jie, Xiao Yi, et al. Remote Sensing, 2023, 15(2):465.
[7] Lin Lixin, Liu Xixi. Computer and Electronics in Agriculture, 2022, 192(0):106634.
[8] ZHANG Xin, YANG Chao, LIU Hong-bin, et al(张 鑫, 杨 超, 刘洪斌, 等). Tobacco Science & Technology(烟草科技), 2022, 55(8):20.
[9] CHEN Hao-yu, XIANG Lei, GAO He, et al(陈昊宇, 项 磊, 高 贺, 等). Remote Sensing for Natural Resources(自然资源遥感), 2023, 35(3):170.
[10] YANG Mei-hua, ZHAO Xiao-min, FANG Qian, et al(杨梅花, 赵晓敏, 方 倩, 等). Scientia Agricultura Sinica(中国农业科学), 2014, 47(12):2374.
[11] Shi T, Cui L, Wang J, et al. Plant and Soil, 2013,366:313.
[12] Wang Y, Li M, Ji R, et al. Sensors, 2020, 20(24):7078.
[13] Ma J J, Cheng J, Wang J H, et al. Information Processing in Agriculture, 2022, 9: 566.
[14] ZHANG Heng, LIANG Tai-bo, FENG Wen-qiang, et al(张 恒, 梁太波, 冯文强, 等). Chinese Tobacco Science(中国烟草科学), 2023, 44(5):103.
[15] ZHANG Xiu-quan, LI ZHi-wei, ZHENG De-cong, et al(张秀全, 李志伟, 郑德聪, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2023, 43(3):903.
[16] ZHOU Zhi-hua(周志华). Maching Learning(机器学习). Beijing: Tsinghua University Press(北京:清华大学出版社), 2016.
[17] DONG Xue-mei, WANG Jie-wei(董雪梅, 王洁微). Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence(模式识别与人工智能), 2019, 32(7):589.
[18] WANG Lu, SUN Ju-bo(王 璐, 孙聚波). Journal of Jilin Engineering Normal University(吉林工程技术师范学院学报), 2021, 37(12):109.
[19] WANG Qiang, HU Rong(王 强, 胡 荣). Computer Engineering and Design(计算机工程与设计), 2022, 43(12):3443.
[20] CHEN Hua-you, HOU Ding-pi(陈华友,侯定丕). Journal of Systems Engineering(系统工程学报), 2003, 18(3):203.
[21] MA Wei-biao, WANG Hong-yan, RUI Qiang(马伟标,王红岩,芮 强). Journal of System Simulation(系统仿真学报),2012,24(4):774.
[22] Stenberg B, Viscarra Rossel R A, Mouazen A M. Advances in Agronomy, 2010, 107:163.
[23] WANG Wen-cai, ZHAO Liu, LI Shao-wen, et al(王文才,赵 刘,李绍稳,等). Acta Agricultruae Zhejiangensis(浙江农业学报), 2018, 30(9):1576.
[24] Wang Y, Liao Z, Stéphanie Mathieu, et al. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021, 404(Pt A):123965.
[25] ZHANG Peng-cheng, LI Wei-juan, WANG Jun(张朋程, 李伟娟, 王 军). China Energy and Environmental Protection(能源与环保), 2023, 45(6):198.
[26] Hong Y, Liu Y, Chen Y, et al. Geoderma, 2019, 337:758.
|
[1] |
CAO Yue1, BAO Ni-sha1, 2*, ZHOU Bin3, GU Xiao-wei1, 2, LIU Shan-jun1, YU Mo-li1. Research on Remote Sensing Inversion Method of Surface Moisture Content of Iron Tailings Based on Measured Spectra and Domestic Gaofen-5 Hyperspectral High-Resolution Satellites[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(04): 1225-1233. |
[2] |
LAI Si-han1, LIU Yan-song1, 2, 3*, LI Cheng-lin1, WANG Di1, HE Xing-hui1, LIU Qi1, SHEN Qian4. Study on Hyperspectral Inversion of Rare-Dispersed Element Cadmium Content in Lead-Zinc Ores[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(04): 1275-1281. |
[3] |
ZHANG Xiu-quan1, LI Zhi-wei1*, ZHENG De-cong1*, SONG Hai-yan1, WANG Guo-liang2. VIS-NIR Hyperspectral Prediction of Soil Organic Matter Based on
Stacking Generalization Model[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(03): 903-910. |
[4] |
HU Yi-bin1, BAO Ni-sha1, 2*, LIU Shan-jun1, 2, MAO Ya-chun1, 2, SONG Liang3. Research on Hyperspectral Features and Recognition Methods of Typical Camouflage Materials[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(01): 297-302. |
[5] |
ZHANG Chao1, 2, LIU Shan-jun1*, YI Wen-hua1, XIE Zi-chao2, LIU Bo-xiong2, YUE Heng1. Effect of Granularity on the Characteristics of Visible-Near Infrared Spectra of Different Coal Particles[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(12): 3858-3863. |
[6] |
YANG Xin1, 2, YUAN Zi-ran1, 2, YE Yin1, 2*, WANG Dao-zhong1, 2, HUA Ke-ke1, 2, GUO Zhi-bin1, 2. Winter Wheat Total Nitrogen Content Estimation Based on UAV
Hyperspectral Remote Sensing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(10): 3269-3274. |
[7] |
XU Liang-ji1, 2, MENG Xue-ying2, WEI Ren2, ZHANG Kun2. Experimental Research on Coal-Rock Identification Method Based on
Visible-Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(07): 2135-2142. |
[8] |
FU Yan-hua1, LIU Jing2*, MAO Ya-chun2, CAO Wang2, HUANG Jia-qi2, ZHAO Zhan-guo3. Experimental Study on Quantitative Inversion Model of Heavy Metals in Soda Saline-Alkali Soil Based on RBF Neural Network[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(05): 1595-1600. |
[9] |
MAO Ya-chun1, WEN Jian1*, FU Yan-hua2, CAO Wang1, ZHAO Zhan-guo3, DING Rui-bo1. Quantitative Inversion Model Based on the Visible and Near-Infrared Spectrum for Skarn-Type Iron Ore[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(01): 68-73. |
[10] |
WANG Dong, LIU Shan-jun*, MAO Ya-chun, LI Heng-yu, QI Yu-xin. Effect of Grade on Reflectance Spectra of Anshan Iron Mine[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(10): 3193-3198. |
[11] |
MAO Ya-chun1,2, DING Rui-bo1*, LIU Shan-jun1,2, BAO Ni-sha1,2. Research on Inversion Model of Low-Grade Porphyry Copper Deposit Based on Visible-Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(08): 2474-2478. |
[12] |
YE Fa-wang1, WANG Jian-gang1, QIU Jun-ting1, ZHANG Chuan1, YU Xin-qi2, LIU Xiu2. Study on Correlation Between Total Organic Carbon, Soluble Hydrocarbon, Pyrolytic Hydrocarbon Content and Spectral Index in Source Rocks[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(04): 1001-1006. |
[13] |
YU Mo-li, LIU Shan-jun*, SONG Liang, HUANG Jian-wei, LI Tian-zi, WANG Dong. Spectral Characteristics and Remote Sensing Model of Tailings with Different Water Contents[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(10): 3096-3101. |
[14] |
ZHANG Dong-hui, ZHAO Ying-jun, ZHAO Ning-bo, QIN Kai, PEI Cheng-kai, YANG Yue-chao. A New Indirect Extraction Method for Selenium Content in Black Soil from Hyperspectral Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(07): 2237-2243. |
[15] |
SONG Liang, LIU Shan-jun*, MAO Ya-chun, WANG Dong, YU Mo-li. A Classification Method Based on the Visible Spectrum for Burned and Unburned Gangue Distinguishment[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(04): 1148-1153. |
|
|
|
|