|
|
|
|
|
|
SATS: A Stellar Spectral Classification Algorithm Based on Multiple Feature Extraction |
TU Liang-ping1, 2, LI Shuang-chuan2, TU Dong-xin1*, LI Jian-xi*, DING Zhi-chao2 |
1. School of Mathematics and Statistics, Minnan Normal University, Zhangzhou 363000, China
2. School of Science,University of Science and Technology Liaoning,Anshan 114051,China
|
|
|
Abstract An in-depth study of a stellar's spectrum provides insight into its chemical composition and physical properties. Stellar spectrum classification is an important direction in stellar spectrum research. With the emergence of massive stellar spectrum data, artificial classification cannot meet scientific research needs. Based on this, this paper constructs the SATS algorithm, which realizes the automatic classification of F, G, and K-type stellar spectra. Firstly, the SATS algorithm uses singular value decomposition (SVD) to denoise the normalized stellar spectra. Then, the SATS algorithm performs feature extraction on the stellar spectrum. The feature extraction layer consists of six modules:Incremental principal component analysis (IPCA), nuclear principal component analysis (KPCA), sparse principal component analysis (SparsePCA), FactorAnalysis, independent component analysis (FastICA) and Transformer(the six modules are collectively referred to as Analysis module), to ensure that the variance contribution rate is above 0.95, IPCA, KPCA, SparsePCA, FactorAnalysis and FastICA extract the stellar spectral features into 300 dimensions. Finally, the stellar spectra are fed into the SoftMax layer for automatic classification. SATS algorithm combines multiple analysis modules to improve the accuracy of classification further using a single analysis module. Once again, the combination of Transformer modules and multiple Analysis modules improves classification accuracy. The most significant advantage of the SATS algorithm is that it performs multiple feature extraction on the stellar spectrum, which retains the stellar spectral information to the maximum extent and minimizes the information loss by different feature extraction methods. The final classification accuracy of the SATS algorithm is 0.93, which classification accuracy is also higher than that of the hybrid deep learning algorithms CNN+Bayes, CNN+Knn, CNN+SVM, CNN+Adaboost and CNN+Adaboost 0.86, 0.88, 0.89, 0.87, 0.89.
|
Received: 2022-11-22
Accepted: 2023-10-02
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
TU Dong-xin, LI Jian-xi
E-mail: ptjxli@hotmail.com
|
|
[1] York D G, Adelman J, Anderson Jr J E, et al. The Astrophysical Journal, 2000, 120(3): 1579.
[2] Zhao G, Zhao Y H, Chu Y Q, et al. Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2012, 12(7): 723.
[3] Chen Jing, Luo Ali, Li Yinbi, et al. The Astrophysical Journal, 2022, 931: 133.
[4] Xiang M, Rix H W. Nature, 2022, 603: 599.
[5] Martin N F, Venn K A, Aguado D S, et al. Nature, 2022, 601: 45.
[6] LU Ya-kun, QIU Bo, LUO A-li, et al(逯亚坤, 邱 波, 罗阿理, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2022, 42(6): 1881.
[7] Zhao Z, Wei J, Jiang B. Advances in Astronomy, 2022, 2022: 4489359.
[8] Kyritsis E, Maravelias G, Zezas A, et al. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 2022, 657: A62.
[9] HONG Shu-xin, ZOU Zhi-qiang, XU Ling-zhe(洪舒欣, 邹志强, 徐灵哲). Acta Astronomica Sinica(天文学报), 2021, 62(5): 48.
[10] Liu Zhongbao. New Astronomy, 2021, 88: 101613.
[11] DU Li-ting, HONG Li-hua, YANG Jin-tao, et al(杜利婷, 洪丽华, 杨锦涛, 等). Acta Astronomica Sinica(天文学报), 2021, 62(1): 8.
[12] Michael J Brice,Rǎzvan Andonie. The Astronomical Journal, 2019, 158(5): 188.
[13] Sharma K, Kembhavi A, Vaghmare K, et al. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2020, 491(2): 2280.
[14] Liu Zhongbao, Zhou Fangxiao, Qin Zhentao, et al. Astrophysics and Space Science, 2018, 363(7): 140.
[15] ZHANG Jing-min, MA Chen-ye, WANG Lu, et al(张静敏,马晨晔,王 璐,等). Acta Astronomica Sinica(天文学报), 2020, 61(2): 20.
[16] Gu J, Wang Z, Kuen J, et al. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1512. 07108.
|
[1] |
WANG Xiao-min1, GAO Jun-ping1*, PU Yuan2*, QIU Bo1*, ZHANG Jian-nan3, YAN Jing1, LI Rong1. The “Unknown” Spectral Classification Study of LAMOST:
ODS-YOLOv7 Model[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(07): 1960-1967. |
[2] |
LI Hao1, ZHAO Qing1*, CUI Chen-zhou2, FAN Dong-wei2, ZHANG Cheng-kui1, SHI Yan-cui1, WANG Yuan1. A Stellar Spectrum Classification Algorithm Based on CNN and LSTM Composite Deep Learning Model[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(06): 1668-1675. |
[3] |
LI He1, WANG Yu2, FAN Kai2, MAO Yi-lin2, DING Shi-bo3, SONG Da-peng3, WANG Meng-qi3, DING Zhao-tang1*. Evaluation of Freezing Injury Degree of Tea Plant Based on Deep
Learning, Wavelet Transform and Visible Spectrum[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 234-240. |
[4] |
FAN Ya-wen, LIU Yan-ping*, QIU Bo, JIANG Xia, WANG Lin-qian, WANG Kun. Research on Spectral Classification of Stellar Subtypes Based on
SSTransformer[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2523-2528. |
[5] |
CAI Hai-hui1, ZHOU Ling2, SHI Zhou3, JI Wen-jun4, LUO De-fang1, PENG Jie1, FENG Chun-hui5*. Hyperspectral Inversion of Soil Organic Matter in Jujube Orchard
in Southern Xinjiang Using CARS-BPNN[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2568-2573. |
[6] |
JIANG Xia*, QIU Bo, WANG Lin-qian, GUO Xiao-yu. Automatic Classification Method of Star Spectra Based on
Semi-Supervised Mode[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(06): 1875-1880. |
[7] |
LI Shuang-chuan, TU Liang-ping*, LI Xin, WANG Li-li. Besvm: A-Type Star Spectral Subtype Classification Algorithm Based on Transformer Feature Extraction[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(05): 1575-1581. |
[8] |
GUI Jiang-sheng1, HE Jie1, FU Xia-ping2. Hyperspectral Detection of Soybean Heart-Eating Insect Pests Based on Image Retrieval[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(09): 2931-2934. |
[9] |
LU Ya-kun1, QIU Bo1*, LUO A-li2, GUO Xiao-yu1, WANG Lin-qian1, CAO Guan-long1, BAI Zhong-rui2, CHEN Jian-jun2. Classification of 2D Stellar Spectra Based on FFCNN[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(06): 1881-1885. |
[10] |
LIU Zhong-bao1, WANG Jie2*. Research on the Improvement of Spectra Classification Performance With the High-Performance Hybrid Deep Learning Network[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(03): 699-703. |
[11] |
WANG Tian-xiang1, 2, FAN Yu-feng1*, WANG Xiao-li1, LONG Qian1, WANG Chuan-jun1. Prediction of Stellar Spectrum Categories Based on Deep Residual Network[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(05): 1602-1606. |
[12] |
MA Yang, ZHANG Ji-fu, CAI Jiang-hui, YANG Hai-feng, ZHAO Xu-jun*. Parallel Extraction and Analysis of Abnormal Features of QSO Spectra Based on Sparse Subspace[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(04): 1086-1091. |
[13] |
TANG Yong-sheng, CHEN Zheng-guang*. Soil pH Prediction Based on Convolution Neural Network and Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(03): 892-897. |
[14] |
JIANG Bin, ZHAO Zi-liang, WANG Shu-ting, WEI Ji-yu, QU Mei-xia*. Decomposition and Classification of Stellar Spectra Based on t-SNE[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(09): 2913-2917. |
[15] |
ZHAO Zhong1*, LI Bin1, WU Yan-xian1, YUAN Hong-fu2. Edible Oil Classification Based on Molecular Spectra Analysis With SIMCA-SVDD Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(08): 2651-2656. |
|
|
|
|