无人机高光谱遥感的水稻叶瘟病的光谱特征提取与检测方法研究

doi:10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2024)05-1457-07

Abstract
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (10167 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract To determine the optimal classification model for unmanned aerial hyperspectral remote sensing for detection of leaf blast in rice canopies, the research is based on rice field trials, hyperspectral images of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in the 400~1 000 nm band were acquired, referring to the national standard GBT 15790-2009 specification for rice blast detection and survey, leaf blast is categorized into five classes according to the disease index, a total of 227 hyperspectral data sets were extracted for levels 0 to 4. The data were preprocessed using Savitzky- Golay smoothing (SG smoothing), first-order differential spectroscopy (1-Der) and second-order differential spectroscopy (2-Der) methods, and SVM models are constructed and compared to arrive at a better preprocessing method. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to select the cumulative contribution of the principal components, continuous projection (SPA) and random frog (RF) methods for screening spectral signature bands, and using the results of the screening as inputs to the model, constructing Particle Swarm Optimization for Extreme Learning Machines (PSO-ELM), Extreme Learning Machines (ELM), Support Vector Machines (SVM) and Decision Tree (DT) classification models, respectively. The results show that compared with 1-Der and 2-Der, the SG smoothing method has better denoising effect, higher classification accuracy, and is a better preprocessing method, the classification accuracy and Kappa coefficient were 93.47% and 91.85%, respectively. The cumulative contribution of the first 2 PCs of the PCA was 93.13%, and for the effective construction of the model, the first 6 PCs were finally selected with a cumulative contribution of 99.02%,SPA used RMSE as the criterion for the selection of the best spectral signature bands, showing a total of seven best spectral signature bands, The visible wavelength bands are 400.8, 416.7 and 426.2 nm, the green wavelength band is 566nm, the red wavelength band is 683.9nm, and the near-infrared wavelength bands are 830.2 and 916.4 nm, RF selected the bands with a screening probability greater than 0.2 as the best spectral signature bands, and finally screened eight spectral signature bands, including 663.4 and 694.2 nm for red light, and 784.4, 787.9, 791.4, 905.5, 927.2, and 930.9 nm for the near-infrared band, this method effectively reduces the inter-band correlation and redundancy, while the three screening results are constructed into classification models separately, and the results show that the overall classification accuracies of all models are all greater than 92.61%, the modeling results were better, in which the PSO-ELM model was used to classify PCA with an accuracy of 97.77% and a Kappa coefficient of 97.22%, the highest classification accuracy among all models, 1.42% and 1.56% higher compared to the highest classification accuracy and Kappa coefficient of the ELM model, the highest classification accuracy and Kappa coefficient are 2.12% and 2.66% higher compared to SVM model and 4.44% and 5.58% higher compared to DT model. The comprehensive evaluation of PSO-ELM model modeling is better than ELM model, SVM model and DT model, which is the optimal classification model. Therefore, it is feasible to use UAV hyperspectral remote sensing to detect rice leaf blast, providing scientific basis and technical support for rice production and leaf blast detection.

Key words：Rice;Leaf blast;Unmanned aerial vehicle;Hyperspectral;Machine learning

Received: 2022-05-05 Accepted: 2023-09-18

ZTFLH:

TP79

Corresponding Authors: XU Tong-yu E-mail: yatongmu@163.com

Cite this article:

LIU Zi-yang,FENG Shuai,ZHAO Dong-xue, et al. Research on Spectral Feature Extraction and Detection Method of Rice Leaf Blast by UAV Hyperspectral Remote Sensing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(05): 1457-1463.

URL:

https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2024)05-1457-07 OR https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/Y2024/V44/I05/1457

[1] BAI Yu-lu，WANG Ping，ZHANG Qiong，et al（白玉路，王平，张琼，等）. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences（西南农业学报），2019，32（5）：947.
[2] WANG Yu-na，LI Fen-ling，WANG Wei-dong，et al（王玉娜，李粉玲，王伟东，等）. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering（农业工程学报），2020，36（22）：31.
[3] Jin Xiu，Jie Lu，Wang Shuai, et al. Remote Sensing，2018，10（3）：395.
[4] LAN Yu-bin，ZHU Zi-hao，DENG Xiao-ling，et al（兰玉彬，朱梓豪，邓小玲，等）. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering（农业工程学报），2019，35（3）：92.
[5] LI Zhi-wei，YUAN Jing，DING Wei-min，et al（李志伟，袁婧，丁为民，等）. Journal of South China Agricultural University（华南农业大学学报），2018，39（6）：103.
[6] TIAN You-wen，LI Tian-lai，ZHANG Lin，et al（田有文，李天来，张琳，等）. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering（农业工程学报），2010，26（5）：202.
[7] KONG Fan-chang，LIU Huan-jun，YU Zi-yang，et al（孔繁昌，刘焕军，于滋洋，等）. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering（农业工程学报），2020，36（22）：68.
[8] ZHENG Zhi-xiong，QI Long，MA Xu，et al（郑志雄，齐龙，马旭，等）. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering（农业工程学报），2013，29（19）：138.
[9] HUANG Shuang-ping，SUN Chao，QI Long，et al（黄双萍，孙超，齐龙，等）. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering（农业工程学报），2017，33（20）：177.
[10] KANG Li，YUAN Jian-qing，GAO Rui，et al（康丽，袁建请，高睿，等）. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis（光谱学与光谱分析），2021，41（3）：898.
[11] Zheng Qiong，Huang Wenjiang，Ye Huichun，et al. Applied Optics，2020，59(26)：8003.
[12] ZHANG Du-juan，WANG Zhen（张杜鹃，王震）. Foreign Electronic Measurement Technology（外国电子测量技术），2021，40（8）：82.