|
|
|
|
|
|
Quantification of Au in Gold Ornaments Obtained by Different Electroformed Process |
JIN Xu-guang1, 2, WANG Jin-zhuan1, 2*, LI Bei1, 2, QUE Wan-ting1, 2, WANG Liang1, 2, ZHANG Fan1, 2, ZHANG Chi1, ZHOU Jun-gui1, FU Rong-jin1 |
1. Nanjing Institute of Supervision & Testing on Product Quality (Nanjing Institute of Quality Development and Advanced Technology Application), Nanjing 210019, China
2. National Center of Inspection & Testing on Gold and Silver Products Quality (Nanjing), Nanjing 210019, China
|
|
|
Abstract Determining the amount of gold and impurity in electroformed gold ornaments is mainly performed by the cupellation method and the inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES). However, the gold contents of electroformed gold ornaments are different according to these two methods, especially whether the gold ornaments are prepared by electroformed process from cyanide or non-cyanide bath. In the paper, the content of 26 impurity elements for gold samples was determined by glow discharge mass spectrometry (GDMS). The measured results are high for every impurity according to the instrument's relative sensitivity factors(RSF. The ratios of the instrument RSF and corrected RSF range from 0.96 to 1.90 for 16 elements except the copper and chromium elements. The ratios for these two elements are 3.01 and 3.91 respectively. Thus, the results show that the relative sensitivity factors of the instrument can be used for quantitative analysis of impurities from gold ornaments. Besides, the GDMS method was used to determine gold contents, with fire assay and ICP-AES as controls. The gold content of GDMS method is consistent with that of the fire assay and ICP-AES for the electroformed gold ornaments from the non-cyanide bath, but the gold content of GDMS method for electroformed gold ornaments from the cyanide bath is still consistent with that of the fire assay, but that is lower than that of ICP-AES. It indicates that the GDMS and fire assay methods are suitable for the accurate determination of gold content for the electroformed gold ornaments from cyanide/non-cyanide baths, whereas the ICP-AES method is only suitable for the electroformed gold ornaments from the non-cyanide bath. Besides, compared with the ICP-AES method, the carbon and nitrogen elements can be tested by GDMS method. It was revealed that the contents of carbon, nitrogen, sodium, and potassium elements determined by the GDMS method for electroformed gold ornaments from cyanide bath were significantly higher than those for the electroformed gold ornaments from the non-cyanide bath. It can be used to infer the possible preparation process of the electroformed gold ornaments.
|
Received: 2022-04-25
Accepted: 2022-08-03
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
WANG Jin-zhuan
E-mail: wangjinzhuan33@163.com
|
|
[1] Saradesh K,Vinodkumar G S. Gold Bulletin,2020,53(1):19.
[2] CHEN Jun-wu,HE Shi-huan(陈钧武,何士桓),DIAN ZHU YUAN LI YU GONG YI(电铸原理与工艺). Beijing:Chemical Industry Press(北京:化学工业出版社),2010.
[3] WANG Ming-liang,YANG Hai-yan,HANG Tao,et al(王明亮,杨海燕,杭 弢,等). Plating & Finishing(电镀与精饰),2019,41(11):26.
[4] Wu B,Huang J M,Lü Z M,etal. RSC Advances,2020,10:9768.
[5] GB/T 9288—2019. Gold Jewellery Alloys-Determination of Gold-Cupellation Method (Fire Assay). National Standard of the People's Republic of China(中华人民共和国国家标准. 金合金首饰金含量的测定灰吹法(火试金法) ). 2019.
[6] GB/T 40114—2021. Jewellery-Determination of Precious Metal Content-Difference Method Using Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectroscopy. National Standard of the People's Republic of China (中华人民共和国国家标准. 首饰贵金属含量的测定 ICP差减法). 2021.
[7] GB/T 38145—2019. High Content Precious Metals Jewellery Alloys-Determination of Gold, Platinum and Palladium-Difference Method Using Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectroscopy. National Standards of the People's Republic of China(中华人民共和国国家标准. 高含量贵金属合金首饰金、铂、钯含量的测定 ICP差减法). 2019.
[8] ZHANG Hai-long,WANG Jing,LIN Yan-qin,et al(张海龙,王 晶,林燕琴,等). Gold(黄金),2021,42(11):93.
[9] World Health Organization (WHO),Hydrogen Cyanide and Cyanides: Human Health Aspects. Concise International Chemical Assessment Documents 61 (2004) Geneva. http://www.inchem.org/documents/cicads/cicads/cicad61.htm.
[10] Paudel G,Di Sabatino M. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry,2020,35:2748.
[11] Wei X J,Qin Z,Xiong P H,etal.Spectrochimica Acta Part B:Atomic Spectroscopy,2019,154:43.
[12] TANG Yi-chuan,ZHOU Tao,XU Chang-kun(唐一川,周 涛,徐常昆). Journal of Instrumental Analysis(分析测试学报),2012,31(6):664.
|
[1] |
YANG Guo-wu1, HOU Yan-xia1, SUN Xiao-fei2, JIA Yun-hai1*, LI Xiao-jia1. Evaluation of Long-Term Stability for Non-Standard Method and
Application in Trace Element Analysis of Pure Nickel by Glow
Discharge Mass Spectrometry[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(03): 867-876. |
[2] |
WANG Zi-ren, WANG Chang-hua, HU Fang-fei, LI Ji-dong*. Quantification of Trace Impurities in Graphite by Glow Discharge Mass Spectrometry[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(04): 1256-1261. |
[3] |
SUN Qian-qian, DU Min, GUO Lian-bo, HAO Zhong-qi, YI Rong-xing, LI Jia-ming, LIU Jian-guo, SHEN Meng, LI Xiang-you*, ZENG Xiao-yan, LU Yong-feng. Fast Identification of Plastics with Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2017, 37(07): 2205-2209. |
[4] |
HE Dong-xian1, HU Juan-xiu1, LU Shao-kun1, HE Hou-yong2. An Optical-Fiber-Sensor-Based Spectrophotometer for Soil Non-Metallic Nutrient Determination[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2012, 32(01): 214-218. |
|
|
|
|