|
|
|
|
|
|
Grapefruit Light Energy Decay Law and Analysis of the Effect of
Transmission Depth on Model Accuracy |
LI Xiong1, 2, LIU Yan-de1, 2*, WANG Guan-tian1, JIANG Xiao-gang1, 2 |
1. School of Mechatronics and Vehicle Engineering, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013, China
2. Institute of Intelligent Mechatronics Equipment Innovation, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013, China
|
|
|
Abstract Grapefruit peel is thick. The peel and pulp belong to two different media, and the refractive index and absorption of light from the peel and pulp are different. Modeling of grapefruit soluble solids content without removing the interference of fruit peel, can lead to poor model accuracy. To address the problem of poor model accuracy due to the mismatch between spectral acquisition and target when building a fruit quality detection model. To address the problem of poor model accuracy due to the mismatch between spectral acquisition and target when establishing fruit quality detection models, this study takes ShangraoMajiya grapefruit as the experimental object, builds an adjustable experimental platform independently, acquires and analyzes the light energy attenuation pattern of whole grapefruit, searches for the relationship between grapefruit thickness and light transmission, and explores the effects of peel thickness and light transmission depth on grapefruit SSC detection accuracy. Firstly, the transmitted light source was placed directly above the equatorial circle of the grapefruit, and the spectral intensity received by different regions of the equatorial grapefruit circle was counted. The spectral intensity distribution was plotted, and the results showed that the further away from the light source emission point, the lower the spectral intensity. The light intensity received at the incident point from far and near positions accounted for 33.40%, 2.90%, 0.50%, 0.40%, 0.20%. The absorption of light by the grapefruit peel was more obvious, and the scattered light energy accounted for a smaller proportion. Secondly, the slicing method was used to record the remaining thickness and the corresponding spectral intensity, and to draw the curve of the changing pattern of spectral intensity.The smaller the remaining thickness, the greater the spectral intensity when the thickness was 32.90 mm, the spectral intensity changed dramatically, when the fruit thickness was higher than 32.92 mm, the photon intensity received by the fruit was generally lower when the fruit was lower than 32.92 mm, the spectral intensity undertook a jump increase. Then the flesh, whole fruit and peel spectra were collected, and the SSC prediction model was developed using partial least squares, and the best prediction was obtained for the peeled flesh. Finally, the spectra were collected when the thickness of grapefruit flesh, peel + flesh was 40, 30, 20 and 10 mm, and the SSC prediction models with different thicknesses were established. The correlation coefficients of the prediction sets were 0.91, 0.89, 0.87 and 0.86 when the thickness of flesh was 20, 40, 60 and 80 mm respectively. The SSC prediction model had the highest accuracy when the flesh was at a transmission depth of 20 mm. The spectral transmission depth of peel+pulp was 20, 40, 60 and 80 mm, and the prediction set correlation coefficients were 0.78, 0.86, 0.93 and 0.84, respectively, with the best prediction at a transmission depth of 60 mm for peel+pulp.The results show that the difference in tissue composition inside the fruit skin and pulp affects the results of SSC prediction, but changing the transmission distance of visible/NIR inside the fruit can also optimize the model accuracy. This study reveals the diffuse transmission characteristics of visible/NIR in fruit tissue, which can provide a realistic basis for developing online sorting devices for the quality of thick-skinned fruits.
|
Received: 2022-04-10
Accepted: 2022-08-01
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
LIU Yan-de
E-mail: jxliuyd@163.com
|
|
[1] Walsh K B, José Blasco, Zude-Sasse M, et al. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2020, 168: 111246.
[2] LI Xin-xing, GUO Wei, BAI Xue-bing, et al(李鑫星, 郭 渭, 白雪冰, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2021, 41(5): 1343.
[3] Seifert B, Zude M, Spinelli L, et al. Physiologia Plantarum, 2015, 153(2): 327.
[4] LI Li-sha, LIU Yan-de, HU Jun, et al(黎丽莎, 刘燕德, 胡 军, 等). Journal of East China Jiaotong University(华东交通大学学报), 2021, 38(6): 95.
[5] Guoqiang F, Jianwen Z, Ran D. Journal of Food Engineering, 2009, 93(4): 416.
[6] Xia Y, Huang W, Fan S, et al. Infrared Physics & Technology, 2019, 97: 467.
[7] Tong S, Hong J L, Hui R X, et al. Postharvest Biology & Technology, 2009, 51(1): 86.
[8] Xu H, Qi B, Sun T, et al. Journal of Food Engineering, 2012, 109(1): 142.
[9] Leiva-Valenzuela G A, Lu R, Aguilera J M. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 2014, 24: 2.
[10] Jie D, Xie L, Rao X, et al. Postharvest Biology & Technology, 2014, 90: 1.
[11] XU Huan-liang, SUN Yun-xiao, CAO Xue-lian, et al(徐焕良, 孙云晓, 曹雪莲, 等). Journal of Agricultural Machinery(农业机械学报), 2021, 52(8): 338.
[12] GUO Zhi-ming, WANG Jun-yi, SONG Ye, et al(郭志明, 王郡艺, 宋 烨, 等). Journal of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2021, 37(22): 271.
[13] HU Dong, SUN Tong, YING Yi-bin(胡 栋, 孙 通, 应义斌). Journal of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2020, 36(7): 284.
|
[1] |
HUANG Hua1, LIU Ya2, KUERBANGULI·Dulikun1, ZENG Fan-lin1, MAYIRAN·Maimaiti1, AWAGULI·Maimaiti1, MAIDINUERHAN·Aizezi1, GUO Jun-xian3*. Ensemble Learning Model Incorporating Fractional Differential and
PIMP-RF Algorithm to Predict Soluble Solids Content of Apples
During Maturing Period[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3059-3066. |
[2] |
CAI Jian-rong1, 2, HUANG Chu-jun1, MA Li-xin1, ZHAI Li-xiang1, GUO Zhi-ming1, 3*. Hand-Held Visible/Near Infrared Nondestructive Detection System for Soluble Solid Content in Mandarin by 1D-CNN Model[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2792-2798. |
[3] |
YAN Zhong-wei1, 2, 3, TIAN Xi2, 3, ZHANG Yi-fei2, 3, LI Lian-jie2, 3, LIU San-qing1, 2, 3, HUANG Wen-qian2, 3*. Online Detection of Soluble Solids Content in Different Parts of
Watermelons Based on Full Transmission Near Infrared
Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(06): 1800-1808. |
[4] |
WANG Dong1, 2, FENG Hai-zhi3, LI Long3, HAN Ping1, 2*. Compare of the Quantitative Models of SSC in Tomato by Two Types of NIR Spectrometers[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(05): 1351-1357. |
[5] |
YANG Bao-hua, GAO Zhi-wei, QI Lin, ZHU Yue, GAO Yuan. Prediction Model of Soluble Solid Content in Peaches Based on Hyperspectral Images[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(11): 3559-3564. |
[6] |
HU Wen-yan1,3, LIU Hui1,3, WANG Yu-heng1,3, LI Jun-hui1,3, ZHANG Xiao-shuan2, WANG Zhong-yi1,3, ZHAO Long-lian1,3*. Study for the Photon Propagation Properties in Biological Tissue Based on Frequency-Domain Near-Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2017, 37(04): 1074-1080. |
[7] |
HUANG Wen-qian, LI Jiang-bo, CHEN Li-ping*, GUO Zhi-ming . Effectively Predicting Soluble Solids Content in Apple Based on Hyperspectral Imaging[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2013, 33(10): 2843-2846. |
[8] |
LI Shui-fang1, ZHANG Xin2, SHAN Yang2*,LI Zhong-hai1 . Prediction Analysis of Soluble Solids Content and Moisture in Honey by Near Infrared Spectroscopy [J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2010, 30(09): 2377-2380. |
[9] |
TIAN Hai-qing1,2, YING Yi-bin1*, XU Hui-rong1, LU Hui-shan1, XIE Li-juan1 . Study on Vis/NIR Spectra Detecting System for Watermelons and Quality Predicting in Motion [J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2009, 29(06): 1536-1540. |
[10] |
QING Zhao-shen1,JI Bao-ping1*,SHI Bo-lin1,ZHU Da-zhou1,TU Zhen-hua1,ZUDE Manuela2. Improving Apple Fruit Quality Predictions by Effective Correction of Vis-NIR Laser Diffuse Reflecting Images[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2008, 28(06): 1273-1277. |
|
|
|
|