店埠河农业小流域水体溶解性有机质三维荧光光谱的平行因子分析

doi:10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2022)03-0978-06

Abstract
References
Related Citation (5)

Download: PDF (2874 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The agricultural watershed of the Dianbu River is one of the main water sources of Chaohu Lake. It is very important to understand the aquatic ecosystem of Chaohu Lake to study the composition and source of dissolved organic matter (DOM) in this watershed. In combination with the fluorescence excitation-emission matrix spectroscopy of the watershed, the study made some relative processing with the parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC) method, including the Raman and Rayleigh scattering removing, component extraction and so on for the measured fluorescence spectrum matrix. So we realized to analyze the DOM of the agricultural watershed of Dianbu River, including the excitation-emission matrix fluorescence spectrum characteristics analysis, the fluorescence component ratio analysis and the correlation analysis between the fluorescence characteristics and water quality parameters and explored the DOM components and sources of the watershed. The results showed that the DOM of the agricultural watershed in the Dianbu River contained two effective fluorescence components, namely, one kind of protein (tryptophan-like component) and one kind of humus (fulcrum acid-like component). The proportion of fluorescence components indicated that the tryptophan-like component was the main component of the DOM in the watershed. The fluorescence index FI, the autogenous indicator BIX and humification indicator HIX indicated that the DOM has strong autogenous properties and weak humification characteristics. What’s more, its DOM of endogenous mainly comes from the metabolic activity of plants and other water microbial within the lotus pond, DOM of exogenous input from sewage and aquaculture feed. The endogenous of DOM made the main contribution to the organic matter source in the water; the DOC is positively correlated with the tryptophan-like component C1 of DOM, and the protein-like fluorescence component can be used for dynamic DOC tracking of this watershed. The pH value was positively correlated with the fulcruid-like component C2, so the pH value and the fulcruid-like component increased simultaneously, indicating that the water alkalization in this basin was accompanied by the increase of humus like substances in dissolved organic matter. Dissolved oxygen (DO) was negatively correlated with tryptophan-like component C1, indicating that the tryptophan-like component was affected by the content of dissolved oxygen dissolved oxygen content in water. This study traced the fluorescence characteristics of DOM and its component source response mechanism in the small agricultural watershed of Dianbu River, which could better understand its function in the ecosystem and its environmental geochemical cycle process, thus providing a certain scientific basis for the comprehensive environmental management of the watershed.

Key words：The agricultural watershed of Dianbu River; Dissolved organic matter (DOM); Fluorescence excitation emission matrix spectroscopy (EEMs); Parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC)

Received: 2021-02-09 Accepted: 2021-03-08

ZTFLH:

X522

Corresponding Authors: YE Yin E-mail: yeyin1218@163.com

Cite this article:

YANG Xin^1,2,WU Zhi-hang³, et al. Parallel Factor Analysis of Fluorescence Excitation Emission Matrix Spectroscopy of DOM in Waters of Agricultural Watershed of Dianbu River[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(03): 978-983.

URL:

https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2022)03-0978-06 OR https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/Y2022/V42/I03/978

[1] Balch J, Gueguen C. Chemosphere, 2015, 119: 498.
[2] Liu Shasha, Zhao Tianhui, Zhu Yuanrong, et al. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 616: 602.
[3] HE Wei, BAI Ze-lin, LI Yi-long, et al(何伟, 白泽琳, 李一龙, 等). Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae(环境科学学报), 2016, 36(2): 359.
[4] CHENG Qing-lin, ZHENG Bing-hui, WANG Sheng-rui, et al(程庆霖, 郑丙辉, 王圣瑞, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2014, 34(3): 698.
[5] WANG Qi-lei, JIANG Tao, ZHAO Zheng, et al(王齐磊, 江韬, 赵铮, 等). Environmental Science(环境科学), 2015, 36(3): 879.
[6] CHEN Yong-juan, HU Wei-xuan, PANG Shu-jiang, et al(陈永娟, 胡玮璇, 庞树江, 等). Environmental Science(环境科学), 2016, (8): 3017.
[7] ZHU Ai-ju, SUN Dong-yao, TAN Ji, et al(朱爱菊, 孙东耀, 谭季, 等). Environmental Science(环境科学), 2019, 40(1): 164.
[8] Yao Xin, Zhang Yinlin, Zhu Guangwei, et al. Chemosphere, 2011, 82(2): 145.
[9] Wang Hui, Wang Yonghao, Zhuang Wan-e, et al. Chemosphere, 2020, 239: 124734.
[10] Birdwell J E, Engel A S. Organic Geochemistry, 2010, 41(3): 270.
[11] ZHOU Shi-lei, SUN Yue, HUANG Ting-lin, et al(周石磊, 孙悦, 黄廷林, 等). Water Resources Protection(水资源保护)，2020, 36(3): 52.
[12] LIU Yan-yang, QIN Ji-hong, LIU Chen, et al(刘堰杨, 秦纪洪, 刘琛, 等). Environmental Science(环境科学), 2018, (2): 720.
[13] LU Song, JIANG Tao, ZHANG Jin-zhong, et al(卢松, 江韬, 张进忠, 等). China Environmental Science(中国环境科学), 2015, 2: 516.
[14] LIANG Jian, JIANG Tao, LU Song, et al(梁俭, 江韬, 卢松, 等). Environmental Science(环境科学), 2016, 37(7): 2496.
[15] SHAO Tian-tian, LI Liu-yang, WANG Tao, et al(邵田田, 李柳阳, 王涛, 等). Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae(环境科学学报), 2018, 38(4): 1558.
[16] Spencer R G M, Butler K D, Aiken G R. Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences, 2012, 117: G03001.