|
|
|
|
|
|
Theoretical Study on the Structures and IR Spectra of Hydration of Arsenates and Iron Arsenates |
LI Hui-ji1, SUN Hai-jie1, LIU Na1, PENG Zhi-kun2*, LI Yong-yu1, YAN Dan3 |
1. School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Zhengzhou Normal University, Zhengzhou 450044, China
2. Henan Institutes of Advanced Technology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450003, China
3. Changjiang Institute of Survey, Planning, Design and Research, Wuhan 430010, China |
|
|
Abstract The removal of arsenate in water is closely related to its hydration, but there are few reports on the hydration characteristics of different protonated arsenates and iron arsenates, and there is no correlation analysis on infrared spectra of hydration layers of protonated arsenates and iron arsenates. The hydration energies of different protonated arsenates [HmAsO4]m-3(m=0~2) and iron arsenates [FeHmAsO4]m+(m=0~2) were compared at B3LYP/6-311G(d, p) level. Reduced density gradient functions conducted graphical analyses for the intensities, types and locations of the interaction between water molecules with [HmAsO4]m-3(m=0~2) and [FeHmAsO4]m+(m=0~2). And, the characteristics of infrared spectra of the hydration layers of different protonated arsenates and iron arsenates were analyzed. The results show that the hydration of [HmAsO4]m-3(m=0~2) gradually decreases with hydrogen protonation, while the protonation enhances the hydration of [FeHmAsO4]m+(m=0~2). Hydrogen bonds tend to form when a water molecule hydrogen interacts with an oxygen of [HmAsO4]m-3(m=0~2). However, when two hydrogens of water molecules simultaneously interact with two oxygens of [HmAsO4]m-3(m=0~2), the interaction becomes weaker, and the van der Waals force appears. The hydrogen bond formed by water molecules through hydrogen with the oxygen of arsenates is stronger than the hydrogen bond formed by water molecules through oxygen with the hydrogen of protonated arsenates. The unprotonated ON tends to form hydrogen bonds with 2~4 water molecules, while the protonated OP forms hydrogen bonds with at most 2 water molecules, and the OP…HW hydrogen bond is weaker than the ON…HW hydrogen bond. In the infrared spectra, 2 954, 3 114, 3 179, 3 252 and 3 297 cm-1 is the stretching vibration peaks of Ow—Hw in the first hydration shell of AsO3-4; 3 277, 3 324 and 3 376 cm-1 is the stretching vibration peaks of Ow—Hw in the first hydration shell of HAsO2-4; 3 189, 3 277, 3 306 and 3 383 cm-1 is the stretching vibration peaks of Ow—Hw in the first hydration shell of H2AsO-4. The stretching vibration regions for Ow—Hw in the first hydration shell of [FeHmAsO4]m+(m=0~2) are 2 500~3 060, 2 660~3 200, 2 900~3 360 cm-1. Therefore, the stretching vibration regions for the first hydration waters of [HmAsO4]m-3(m=0~2) and [FeHmAsO4]m+(m=0~2) have blue shifts with protonation. Compared with [HmAsO4]m-3(m=0~2), the water molecules in the first hydration layers of [FeHmAsO4]m+(m=0~2) exhibit a significantly red shift of the bending vibration peaks and stretching vibration peaks in the infrared spectra. The hydrogen bond bridge Fe—Ow—Hw…Ow—Hw…ON—As is formed in the first hydration shell of [FeHmAsO4]m+(m=0~2). The Ow—Hw in this hydrogen bond bridge has a special absorption peak, such as the stretching vibration peak located in 2 195, 2 526 and 2 673 cm-1, respectively. Its stretching vibration peak is significantly blue-shifted, but the peak strength is almost unchanged, while its bending vibration peak is red-shifted with the protonation and the strength is significantly reduced. The stretching vibration peak of independent OP—H is not affected by the complexation of Fe, while the position of stretching vibration peak for OP—H in OP—H…Ow is significantly blue shifted, due to the complexation of Fe. This study is helpful to understand better the solubility of arsenates and iron arsenates in water at different pH.
|
Received: 2020-07-15
Accepted: 2020-12-09
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
PENG Zhi-kun
E-mail: pengzhikun@zzu.edu.cn
|
|
[1] Song P, Yang Z, Zeng G, et al. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2017, 317: 707.
[2] Zhang Z B, Li J X, Sun C Z, et al. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 2016, 227(9): 1.
[3] Pang D, Wang C C, Wang P, et al. Chemosphere, 2020, 254: 126829.
[4] Kong Y, Kang J, Shen J, et al. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2017, 24(3): 2381.
[5] Chai L, Yang J, Zhang N, et al. Chemosphere, 2017, 182: 595.
[6] Yang J Q, Chai L Y, Yue M Q, et al. RSC Advances, 2015, 5(126): 103936.
[7] Yan D, Li H J, Cai H Q, et al. Chemosphere, 2018, 194: 117.
[8] Bhattacharjee A, Pribil A B, Lim L H V, et al. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2010, 114(11): 3921.
[9] Tanaka M, Takahashi Y, Yamaguchi N, et al. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2013, 105: 360.
[10] Makreski P, Todorov J, Makrievski V, et al. Journal of Raman Spectroscopy, 2018, 49(4): 747.
[11] Hunter K M, Shakib F A, Paesani F. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2018, 122(47): 10754. |
[1] |
GUO Wei1, CHANG Hao2*, XU Can3, ZHOU Wei-jing2, YU Cheng-hao1, JI Gang2. Effect of Continuous Laser Irradiation on Scattering Spectrum
Characteristics of GaAs Cells[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3674-3681. |
[2] |
LI Hui-ji1, LI Yan-wen1, YU Wei-wei2, HUANG Ru-meng1, SUN Hai-jie1*, PENG Zhi-kun3*. Theoretical Study on the Structures and IR Spectra of Hydration of Arsenates and Iron Arsenates[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(07): 2090-2094. |
[3] |
WANG Xue-mei1, 2, YUMITI Maiming1, HUANG Xiao-yu1, 2, LI Rui1, 2, LIU Dong1, 2. Estimation of Arsenic Content in Soil Based on Continuous Wavelet
Transform[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(01): 206-212. |
[4] |
WANG Lu1, SUN Feng1, 2*, WANG Ruo-su1, LIANG Ya-xin1, YAO Xue3, ZHAO Fan4. Analysis and Research on Color Paints for Cliff Statues in Qionglai Caves[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(10): 3198-3202. |
[5] |
WAN Xiao-ming1, 2, ZENG Wei-bin1, 2, LEI Mei1, 2, CHEN Tong-bin1, 2. Micro-Distribution of Elements and Speciation of Arsenic in the Sporangium of Pteris Vittata[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(02): 478-482. |
[6] |
LI Zhi-yuan1,2, DENG Fan1*, HE Jun-liang2, WEI Wei1. Hyperspectral Estimation Model of Heavy Metal Arsenic in Soil[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(09): 2872-2878. |
[7] |
LI Peng1, LI Zhi2, XU Can2, FANG Yu-qiang2. Research on the Scattering Spectrum of GaAs-Based Triple-Junction Solar Cell Based on Thin-Film Interference Theory[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(10): 3092-3097. |
[8] |
ZHANG Hai-yang1, GAO Bai1, 2*, FAN Hua3 , SHEN Wei1, LIN Cong-ye1. Mechanism of Fluoride and Arsenic Removal by Ce/γ-Al2O3 Based on XRD and FTIR[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(09): 2869-2874. |
[9] |
GAO Shang1, 2, HUANG Fei2*, LIU Jia3, SU Li-min4, WANG Wei1. In Situ Raman Spectra Characterization of Zonal Arsenic-Bearing Pyrite and Arsenopyrite in the Baiyunpu Gold Deposit, Hunan[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(08): 2525-2530. |
[10] |
LIN Hai-lan1, 2, ZHU Ri-long1*, YU Lei2, CHENG Yong-xia3, ZHU Rui-rui2, LIU Pei2, REN Zhan-hong3. Determination of Arsenic, Mercury, Selenium, Antimony and Bismuth in Soil and Sediments by Water Bath Digestion-Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(05): 1528-1533. |
[11] |
CHEN Hong-rui1, ZHANG Duo-rui1, NIE Zhen-yuan1*, ZHENG Lei2, ZHANG Li-li3, YANG Hong-ying4, XIA Jin-lan1. Fe, As and S Speciation Transformation During Arsenopyrite Bioleaching Based on Spectral Analysis Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(03): 934-940. |
[12] |
ZHANG Cong1,2, SU Bo1*, ZHANG Hong-fei1, WU Ya-xiong1, HE Jing-suo1, ZHANG Cun-lin1. Study of Low-Temperature Gallium Arsenide Thin Film Photoconductive Antenna in THz On-Chip System[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(10): 3308-3312. |
[13] |
ZHAO Ming-yue1, 2, 3, CHENG Jun-qi1, 2, YANG Bing-cheng3, WANG Zheng1, 2*. Highly Sensitive Determination of Selenium, Arsenic and Mercury in Seawater by Hydride Generation Coupled with Solution Cathode Glow Discharge Optical Emission Spectrometry[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(05): 1359-1365. |
[14] |
LIANG Piao-piao1, WANG Yi-run1, WANG Ru-ming1, FAN Li-yun1, CHEN Tian-tian1, BAI Ya-hong1, YU Qian-ru1, ZHOU Shan-shan1, LIU Ying1,2*. Level and Risk Assessment of Arsenic in Muti-Media near Mining Area in Yunnan by Using Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(03): 990-996. |
[15] |
YANG Fen1, 2, 3, XIE Shao-wen 1, 2, 3, WEI Chao-yang1, 2*, LIU Jin-xin1, 2, 3. Effects of Methanol Addition on Arsenic Speciation Analysis with HPLC-ICP-MS[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 38(06): 1884-1888. |
|
|
|
|