1. Department of Physics, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China 2. Nanjing Institute of Product Quality Inspection, Nanjing 210019, China 3. Nanjing Institute for Food and Drug Control, Nanjing 210038, China
摘要： 测量不确定度，表征合理地赋予被测量之值的分散性。应用ISO/IEC Guide 98: 1993 Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement(简称GUM方法)的自下而上的策略进行测量不确定度的评定，剖析完整的分析测量过程，可以找出影响测量结果准确性的主要因素;采取针对性的措施，设法消除或降低这些因素的影响，可以改进测量方法。以电感耦合等离子体质谱法测定淀粉和面包糠中铝含量为例，其不确定度来源于测量重复性、最小二乘法拟合工作曲线的过程、标准储备液及其分取稀释过程的不确定度、溶液体积及样品称量过程的不确定度。经过各不确定度分量的评定，得知主要分量是由最小二乘法拟合工作曲线引入的相对标准不确定度urel(cAl)1，其次是由配制标准溶液系列的稀释过程引入的相对标准不确定度urel(cAl)3、由测量结果的重复性引入的相对标准不确定度urel(rep)。因此，采取较高灵敏度的质谱工作模式、增加测定次数、合理选取校准曲线的系列浓度点数值、选用相对误差较小的量器等措施进行方法改进。改进之后，三个主要分量urel(cAl)1，urel(cAl)3，urel(rep)分别从(0.035 8，0.013 2，0.008 5)降为(0.006 0，0.010 5和0.003 3)，铝量的合成相对标准不确定度从0.039降为0.013，扩展不确定度从1.8 mg·kg-1降为0.4 mg·kg-1(k=2)，效果显著。
关键词：测量不确定度;化学分析;方法改进;电感耦合等离子体质谱法;铝
Abstract：The measurement uncertainty is a non-negative parameter associated with the result of a measurement that characterizes the dispersion of the quantity values that could reasonably be attributed to the measurand. In the present study measurement uncertainty is estimated using the GUM (ISO/IEC Guide 98: 1993 Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement) bottom-up approach. The steps were followed: specifying the measurand; identifying all the associated sources of uncertainty; quantifying the uncertainty components; combining the uncertainty components; determining the extended combined standard uncertainty; reviewing the estimates and reporting the measurement uncertainty. In this process, the major uncertainty components with greater impact were identified; try to eliminate or to reduce the impact of these components can improve measurement methods. Examples were the determination of aluminum in starch and bread crumbs by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). The uncertainties of aluminum contents were from measurement repeatability, variability of calibration curve, standard stock solution, dilution, solution volume and sample weighing. The data indicated that the major contributions to the uncertainty budget originating from urel(cAl)1 (the relative standard uncertainty of aluminum content derived from linear least squares calibration), urel(cAl)3 (the relative standard uncertainty of aluminum content derived from the dilution of the standard stock solutions) and urel(rep) (the relative standard uncertainty derived from the repeatability). Based on the analysis of the main individual contributions of each uncertainty source to the total uncertainty value, several modifications were proposed. Firstly helium collision mode was replaced by no gas mode to improve the sensitivity of mass spectrometry. Secondly the number of measurements was increased. Thirdly let the mean of data points in the calibration closer the measurand. Finally the relative error smaller gauges were used. After these modifications, urel(cAl)1, urel(cAl)3 and urel(rep) were from (0.035 8, 0.013 2, 0.008 5) down to (0.006 0, 0.010 5, 0.003 3), respectively; the combined relative standard uncertainty of aluminum was from 0.039 down to 0.013; the expanded uncertainty from 1.8 down to 0.4 mg·kg-1(coverage factor k=2). The improvement effect was significant.
[1] Evaluation of Measurement Data-Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement. JCGM 100, BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, OIML, 2008. [2] Ellison S L R, Williams A. Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement. EURACHEM/CITAC Guide CG 4, Third Edition, 2012. [3] ISO/IEC 17025, General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2005. [4] Maroto A, Boque R, Riu J, et al. Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 1999, 18: 577. [5] Moser J, Wegscheider W, Meisel T, et al. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2003, 377: 97. [6] Hund E, Massart D L, Smeyers-Verbeke J. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2003, 480: 39. [7] Luo Y, Gao S, Longerich H P, et al. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2007, 22: 122. [8] XING Li, WANG Mei, ZHAO Feng-min, et al(兴 丽, 王 梅, 赵凤敏, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2014, 34(1): 226. [9] Ekanem E J, Lori J A, Okibe F G, et al. Journal of Food Technology, 2009, 7(2): 50. [10] Bratakos S M, Lazou A E, Bratakos M S, et al. Food Additives and Contaminants: Part B Surveillance, 2012, 5(1): 33. [11] Beauchemin D. Analytical Chemistry, 2010, 82(12): 4786. [12] Llorent-Martinez E J, Fernandez de Cordova M L, Ruiz-Medina A, et al. Microchemical Journal, 2012, 102: 23. [13] Zhu Y B，Chiba K. Talanta, 2012, 90: 57. [14] Chudzinska M, Debska A，Baralkiewicz D. Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 2012, 17(1): 65. [15] Yenisoy-Karakas. Food Chemistry, 2012, 132: 1555. [16] Chen H, Fan C L, Wang Z B, et al. Analytical Methods, 2013, 5: 3291. [17] Tanase I G, Popa D E, Udristioiu G E, et al. RSC Advances, 2015, 5: 11445.
