Study on the Weathering of a Dinosaur Fossil From Hami, Xinjiang
HAN Xiang-na1, DAI Li-yang1, JIANG Shun-xing2, WANG Xiao-lin2, 3*
1. Institute for Cultural Heritage and History of Science & Technology, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
2. Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044, China
3. College of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Abstract：The discovery of dinosaursfrom the Early Cretaceous Pterosaur Fauna in Xinjiang has increased the diversity of the fauna and provided new information for the phylogenetic evolution of dinosaurs, which is of great scientific significance.However, when the Hami dinosaur fossils were preserved off-site from their original burial environment, they showed severe weathering due to changes in the preservation environment. In order to better preserve, study, and display the Hami dinosaurfossils, this paper used a variety of analytical techniques to examine the Hami dinosaur fossils that have shownsignificant weathering and to analyze the causes of weathering and fragmentation of the fossils.X-ray diffraction (XRD) showed that the severely weathered area of the Hami dinosaur fossils was the cancellous part of the bone. The main mineral components were quartz and calcite, containing less apatite, feldspar and clay minerals. Quartz and feldspar are foreign clastic particles in the cancellous pores of the filled bone.Calcite is a cement formed in the later diagenesis or fossilization process, and a small amount of apatite is mainly from the bone. The results of ion chromatography (IC), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), Raman spectroscopy (Raman) and scanning electron microscopy(SEM-EDS) showed that the soluble salts in the weathering area of dinosaur fossilswere mainly NaCl, CaCl2 and Ca(NO3)2·4H2O, and a small amount of CaSO4. The soluble salt content was as high as 2.63%, and the preliminary conclusion is that the high soluble salt content was the main cause of the severe weathering of fossils.The mercury intrusion test (MIP) results show that the porosity of the weathering area of dinosaur fossilis 21.272 2%, which is significantly increased compared with the porosity of 16.420 6% in the unweathered area. In addition, there are two kinds of pore size distribution in the weathering area of dinosaur fossils, with the sizes of 0.005~0.04 and 17.3~283.2 μm, respectively. Compared with the unweathered area, the weathering area produces microcracks, and the number of large pore-sized pores increases sharply.It is concluded that the fossils contain a large number of deliquescent salts represented by CaCl2 and Ca(NO3)2·4H2O, which are easily affected by the changes intemperature and humidity in Beijingduring four seasons recycles. The deliquescent salts have a great destructive effect, thus increasing the porosity of the weathered areas of the Hami dinosaur fossils and increasing the pores. The internal filling structure is flimsy and heterogeneous, which eventually leads to the fragmentation of the Hami dinosaur fossils.This research work is of scientific significance for preserving and protecting dinosaur fossils from Hami in ex situ.
韩向娜，代黎洋，蒋顺兴，汪筱林. 新疆哈密恐龙骨骼化石风化原因分析[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2024, 44(04): 1106-1111.
HAN Xiang-na, DAI Li-yang, JIANG Shun-xing, WANG Xiao-lin. Study on the Weathering of a Dinosaur Fossil From Hami, Xinjiang. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(04): 1106-1111.
[1] Wang Xiaolin, Kellner A W A, Jiang Shunxing, et al. Current Biology, 2014, 24(12): 1323.
[2] Wang Xiaolin, Kellner A W A, Jiang Shunxing, et al. Science, 2017, 358(6367): 1197.
[3] WANG Xiao-lin, JIANG Shun-xing, CHENG Xin(汪筱林，蒋顺兴，程 心). Science & Technology Review(科技导报), 2018, 36(23): 11.
[4] Wang Xiaolin, Bandeira K L N, Qiu Rui, et al. Scientific Reports, 2021, 11(1): 14962.
[5] LI Ying, LUO Wu-gan, YANG Yi-min, et al(李 颖，罗武干，杨益民，等). Scientia Sinica(Terrae)(中国科学: 地球科学), 2021, 51(3): 398.
[6] LI Ying, LUO Wu-gan, YANG Yi-min, et al(李 颖，罗武干，杨益民，等). Acta Palaeontologica Sinica(古生物学报), 2019, 58(4): 515.
[7] HAN Xiang-na, ZHAO Wen-hua, CHEN Cong, et al(韩向娜，赵文华，陈 熜，等). Geological Review(地质论评), 2022, 68(1): 81.
[8] Peng X, Wang Y, Ma X F, et al. Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology, 2020, 94(2): 347.
[9] CHEN Xiu-xiu, MA Xi-fei, YU Ya-rong, et al(陈秀秀，马西飞，于亚荣，等). Sciences of Conservation and Archaeology(文物保护与考古科学), 2021, 33(6): 124.
[10] LIU Rui-feng, DUAN Qi-san, ZHANG Li-xia, et al(刘瑞峰，段奇三，张丽霞，等). Acta Geoscientica Sinica(地球学报), 2020, 41(4): 554.
[11] HAN Xiang-na, ZHAO Wen-hua, LI Chen-yuan, et al(韩向娜，赵文华，李辰元，等). Acta Palaeontologica Sinica(古生物学报), 2022, 61(1): 151.
[12] DENG Jian-guo, PENG Guang-zhao, JIN Yong-zhong, et al(邓建国，彭光照，金永中，等). Chinese Journal of Spectroscopy Laboratory(光谱实验室), 2010, 27(1): 192.
[13] Turan A C. The Microstructure of Dinosaur Bone: Deciphering Biology with Fine-Scale Techniques. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005. 195.
[14] ZHAO Wen-hua, HAN Xiang-na, CHEN Cong, et al(赵文华，韩向娜，陈 熜，等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2022, 42(2): 561.
[15] ZHANG Hu-yuan, YANG Sheng-qing, SUN Bo, et al(张虎元，杨盛清，孙 博，等). Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering(岩石力学与工程学报), 2021, 40(S2): 3284.
