Abstract:Baseline deviation often occurs with the spectrum data acquisition, making the subsequent identification and analysis results deviate from the true values. Therefore, it is necessary to utilize the baseline correction technology to obtain more accurate spectrum data before the spectrum data analysis. The sparse Bayesian learning (SBL)-based baseline correction method can provide the optimal baseline correction results within the Bayesian framework, and it does not need to select parameters manually. However, the SBL framework is too simple to apply to complex sparsity structures. In practical implementations, if the peak of the pure spectrum is wide, the corresponding sparse representation vector would exhibit a block-sparsity property. The performance of the SBL method will be further improved if the additional block-sparse structure can be exploited appropriately. To this end, we introduce a coupling pattern model into the SBL framework to adaptively learn the block-sparse structure. Due to the inherent learning capability of the SBL framework, the proposed method can significantly improve the baseline correction performance. We conducted several simulations to evaluate the performance improvement, where the proposed method is compared to SSFBCSP and SBL-BC with different noise variances. The simulation results verify the superiority of the proposed method for wide peak recovery. Specifically, it has good stability when the noise level is high, but the performance of other methods degrades substantially. Monte Carlo simulation results further demonstrate that our method can significantly improve the pure spectrum fitting’s normalized mean square error (NMSE) performance. Finally, one real chromatogram dataset and three Raman datasets are used to validate the performance of the proposed method. The experimental results indicate that our method can produce smoother pure spectrum fitting and better denoising effects than others.
陈苏怡,李浩然,戴继生. 基于块稀疏学习的光谱基线校正方法[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2022, 42(12): 3730-3735.
CHEN Su-yi, LI Hao-ran, DAI Ji-sheng. Baseline Correction Method Based on Block Sparse Signal Recovery. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(12): 3730-3735.
[1] Steffen Cychy, Sebastian Lechler, Zijian Huang, et al. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2021, 42(12): 2206.
[2] WANG Qi-ming, TANG Yu-wan, LI Chun-yi, et al(王启明, 唐瑜婉, 李春翼, 等). Food Science(食品科学), 2021, 42(8): 29.
[3] Gamaleev V, Furuta H, Hatta A. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 2019, 47(4): 1841.
[4] WU Jiang-bo, JIA Yun-wei, YAO Cheng-bin, et al(吴江波, 贾云伟, 姚城斌, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2021, 41(7): 2294.
[5] JIANG Xiao-yu, LI Fu-sheng, WANG Qing-ya, et al(江晓宇, 李福生, 王清亚, 等). Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery(农业机械学报), 2021, 52(8): 205.
[6] WANG Hai-peng, CHU Xiao-li, CHEN Pu, et al(王海朋, 褚小立, 陈 瀑, 等). Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry(分析化学), 2021, 49(8): 1270.
[7] Baek S, Park A, Ahn Y, et al. Analyst, 2015, 140: 250.
[8] Xu D, Liu S, Cai Y, et al. Applied Optics, 2019, 58(14): 3913.
[9] He S, Zhang W, Liu L, et al. Analytical Methods, 2014, 6: 4402.
[10] Keinert F, Lazzaro D, et al. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2019, 28(6): 2785.
[11] Wu M, Wang S, Li Z, et al. Applied Intelligence, 2021, 51(11): 8349.
[12] Dai J, Liu A, Lau V K. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2018, 66(10): 2584.
[13] Dai J, Liu A, So H C. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2019, 67(4): 1075.
[14] Han Q, Xie Q, Peng S, et al. Analyst, 2017, 142(13): 2460.
[15] Li H, Dai J, Pan T, et al. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2020, 204: 104088.
[16] Lu L, Chen P, Wu L. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2021, 18(4): 672.
[17] Cao Z, Dai J, Xu W, et al. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2021, 28: 214.
[18] Vitaly I. Korepanov. Journal of Raman Spectroscopy, 2020, 51(10): 2061.