4种含铁矿物药矿物学鉴定及谱学特征对比研究

doi:10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2022)09-2884-06

摘要
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (3086 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要：自然铜、蛇含石、代赭石与磁石均为含铁矿物药，市场上多见伪品或混用现象，这与矿物学鉴定不准确有直接关系。通过性状观察及反光镜鉴定，利用扫描电子显微镜、X射线衍射、微量元素光谱半定量、红外光谱等测试对4种含铁矿物药进行矿物学及谱学鉴定。结果如下：（1）性状鉴定显示矿物药自然铜、蛇含石矿物学均归属为黄铁矿，代赭石为赤铁矿混有少量褐铁矿，磁石为磁铁矿。（2）反光镜测得自然铜反射率约53%，蛇含石反射率约50%，代赭石反射率约47%，磁石反射率约20%，均无内反射，为均质体。（3）扫描电镜观察发现，自然铜为立方体，蛇含石为结核状集合体，代赭石为粒状，磁石为块状。（4）X射线衍射结果显示，自然铜样品中主要衍射线为2.704（10），1.631（9）和2.513（8），黄铁矿含量约95%，褐铁矿5%。蛇含石样品中主要衍射线为2.705（10）和1.631（10），黄铁矿含量约99%。代赭石样品中主要衍射线为2.702（10）和2.519（9），赤铁矿含量约95%，另可见3.351（10），4.250（8）和1.800（8），石英含量约5%。磁石样品中主要衍射线为7.030（10），2.957（9），2.525（8），2.094（7）和1.460（6），磁铁矿含量约98%。（5）微量元素光谱半定量分析显示4种矿物药中均含有Cu，Mo，Co和Mn，微量元素种类与含量差异在于自然铜中含有Yb和B，蛇含石中含有Pb，Sn，Ni和Yb，代赭石中含有Zn，Pb，Ga，V，Ge和In，磁石中含有Zn，Pb，Ni，Be和Sr。（6）红外光谱曲线显示自然铜特征谱线417和343 cm^-1；蛇含石特征谱线413和345 cm^-1；磁石中特征谱线569 cm^-1；代赭石特征谱线1 083，531，452和320 cm^-1，石英含量5%，特征谱线1 083，799，698和398 cm^-1，软锰矿少量。综上，单纯使用性状鉴定不易有效区别4种含铁矿物药，而辅以红外光谱、X射线衍射测试则能有效鉴别。

关键词：含铁矿物药；自然铜；蛇含石；代赭石；磁石；鉴定；红外光谱

Abstract：Pyrite, limonite, red ochre, and magnet are iron-containing mineral medicines. There are many fake or mixed-use phenomena in the market. This is directly related to the inaccuracy of mineralogical identification. This article aims to conduct mineralogical and spectroscopic identification of four iron-containing mineral medicines through character observation and mirror identification using scanning electron microscopy(SEM), X-ray diffraction(XRD), and semi-quantitative trace elements spectroscopy, and infrared spectroscopy(IR). The results are as follows: (1) The character identification shows that pyrite and limonite belong to pyrite, the red ochre is hematite mixed with a small amount of limonite, and the magnet is magnetite. (2) The reflectance of pyrite measured by the reflector is about 53%, the reflectance of limonite is about 50%, the reflectance of red ochre is about 47%, and the reflectance of the magnet is about 20%. There is no internal reflection, and it is a homogeneous body. (3) SEM observation revealed that the pyrite is cubic, the limonite is a nodular aggregate, the red ochre is granular, and the magnet is massive. (4) XRD results show that the main diffraction lines in pyrite are 2.704 (10), 1.631 (9), 1.912 (8), 2.704 (10), 2.513 (8). The content of pyrite and limonite is about 95%, 5%. The main diffraction lines in limonite are 2.705 (10), 1.631 (10), and the content of pyrite is about 99%. The main diffraction lines in the red ochre sample are 2.702 (10), 2.519 (9), and the content of hematite is about 95%,and 3.351 (10), 4.250 (8), 1.800 (8), quartz is about 97%. The main diffraction lines in the magnet sample are 7.030(10), 2.957(9), 2.525(8), 2.094(7), 1.460(6). the content of the magnet is about 98%. (5) Semi-quantitative analysis of trace element spectroscopy shows that the types of trace elements are Cu, Mo, Co, and Mn, but pyrite contains Yb, B, limonite contains Pb, Sn, Ni, Yb, red ochre contains Zn, Pb, Ga, V, Ge, In, and magnet contains Zn, Pb, Ni , Be, Sr. (6) The IR shows that the characteristic spectrum lines of pyrite are 417, 343 cm^-1; the limonite is 413, 345 cm^-1; the red ochre is 569 cm^-1, and the magnet is 1 083, 531, 452, 320 cm^-1. It is not easy to effectively distinguish the four iron-containing mineral medicines by simply using the character identification, while supplemented by infrared spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction tests can effectively identify them.

Key words：Iron-containing mineral medicines; Pyrite; Limonite; Red ochre; Magnet; Identification; Infrared spectrum

收稿日期: 2021-07-30 修订日期: 2021-11-05

中图分类号:

R284.1

基金资助: 陕西省教育厅专项科学研究计划项目（21JK0516），国家自然科学基金项目（41802081），校级专项科研项目(SMZX202145)资助

作者简介: 张丽倩，女，1985年生，长安大学地球科学与资源学院博士研究生 e-mail: zlq1218@163.com

引用本文:

张丽倩，刘养杰. 4种含铁矿物药矿物学鉴定及谱学特征对比研究[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2022, 42(09): 2884-2889.
ZHANG Li-qian, LIU Yang-jie. Comparative Study on Mineralogical Identification and Spectral Characteristics of Four Iron-Containing Mineral Medicines. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(09): 2884-2889.

链接本文:

https://www.gpxygpfx.com/CN/10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2022)09-2884-06 或 https://www.gpxygpfx.com/CN/Y2022/V42/I09/2884

[1] ZHANG Li-qian, LIU Yang-jie(张丽倩, 刘养杰). West China Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences(华西药学杂志), 2020, 35(2): 183.
[2] FU Xing-sheng(傅兴圣). Study on Quality Control Technology of Magnetitum(磁石质量控制技术研究). Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine(南京中医药大学), 2012.
[3] WANG Xin, WANG Ze-ying(王馨, 王泽颖). Global Traditional Chinese Medicine(环球中医药), 2021, 14(1): 82.
[4] ZHU Mei-xiang, WU Xiao-ming(朱美香, 吴小明). Zhejiang Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine(浙江中医杂志), 2019, 54(1): 63.
[5] JIANG Yan-ping, GAN Yan-xiong, YAN Xin, et al(蒋燕萍, 甘彦雄, 严鑫, 等). Pharmacy and Clinics of Chinese Materia Medica(中药与临床), 2016, 7(4): 54.
[6] SUN Yi-guo, SHAO Jia-dong, FAN Qian(孙羿帼, 邵家东, 范倩). Shanxi Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine(山西中医), 2020, 36(8): 38.
[7] LIAO Dun, WEN Shu-hua, LI Xuan(廖敦, 温淑华, 李轩). Chinese Medicine Modern Distance Education of China(中国中医药现代远程教育), 2021, 19(3): 53.
[8] LU Li-feng, LI Gui-rong, ZHANG Li-qing, et al(路立峰, 李桂荣, 张立庆, 等). Chinese Journal of Information on Traditional Chinese Medicine(中国中医药信息杂志), 2013, 20(2): 60.
[9] ZHAO Yu-wen, LU Li-feng, LI Gui-rong, et al(赵玉文, 路立峰, 李桂荣, 等). Food and Drug(食品与药品), 2017, 19(6): 394.
[10] ZHANG Meng-qun, CHEN Yi-jun, WU Yu, et al(张孟群, 陈逸君, 吴育, 等). Journal of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine(南京中医药大学学报), 2016, 32(6): 577.
[11] ZHANG Xiao-dong, CHEN Long, HUANG Bi-sheng, et al(张晓冬, 陈龙, 黄必胜, 等). Chinese Traditional Patent Medicine(中成药), 2018, 40(2): 404.
[12] LIU Sheng-jin, WANG Rui, WU De-kang, et al(刘圣金, 王瑞, 吴德康, 等). Modern Chinese Medicine(中国现代中药), 2015, 17(9): 869.
[13] LI Jun-song, LI Chun-lai, CAI Bao-chang(李俊松，李春来，蔡宝昌). Chinese Society of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Conference Proceeding(中华中医药学会中药炮制分会2009年学术研讨会)，2009: 518.