Research and Application of Band Selection Method Based on CEM
CHEN Yan-long1,2, WANG Xiao-lan3, LI En3, SONG Mei-ping3, BAO Hai-mo4*
1. College of Geosciences and Technology, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China
2. National Marine Environment Monitoring Center, Dalian 116023, China
3. College of Information Science and Technology, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China
4. College of Design, Dalian Minzu University, Dalian 116600, China
Abstract：Hyperspectral data is rich in information and bands, which can provide a more comprehensive basis for geophysical analysis, but at the same time, it also increases the complexity and interference of data analysis, especially in low signal-to-noise ratio applications such as remote sensing monitoring of water quality. Traditional band selection often uses correlation coefficient and other methods to select the identification band in many spectral bands and to analyze the data on the selected band set. In this paper, based on the constrained energy minimization (CEM), a target-oriented band selection algorithm is proposed, which is called CEM-based band selection (CBS). The signal matching filter is used to find the band with a high matching degree with the target vector from the observation vector, and then combined with the orthogonal principle to maximize the selection of a subset of bands that have a high degree of matching with the target vector and low redundancy of the band vector. Based on the determination of the components in the water quality monitoring, the hyperspectral data of the Liaohe estuary test area was collected and combined with the synchronous field water sample data to predict the nitrogen and phosphorus content in the Liaohe waters. Comparing the band selection results of the CBS algorithm with the band selection results of the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC), the significant band subsets obtained by the two methods are used as variables to carry out stepwise regression analysis, and multiple regression models are established to further test the accuracy of the model and analyze the average relative error between the predicted value and the true value. In the accuracy test of the total phosphorus concentration model, the average relative error of the model obtained by the PCC algorithm is 20.7%, and the average relative error of the model obtained by the CBS algorithm is 8.17%. In the accuracy test of the total nitrogen concentration model, the average relative error of the model obtained by the PCC algorithm is 16.8%, and the average relative error of the model obtained by the CBS algorithm is 12.4%. The results of the data analysis show that the band subset obtained by the CBS algorithm is superior to the traditional selection method based correlation coefficient in the ability of nitrogen and phosphorus concentration inversion.
Key words：Hyperspectral remote sensing; Band Selection; Water quality monitoring
陈艳拢，王晓岚，李 恩，宋梅萍，包海默. CEM的波段选择方法研究及应用[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2020, 40(12): 3778-3783.
CHEN Yan-long, WANG Xiao-lan, LI En, SONG Mei-ping, BAO Hai-mo. Research and Application of Band Selection Method Based on CEM. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(12): 3778-3783.
[1] Yang C, Bruzzone L, Zjao H, et al. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2018, 56(12): 7230.
[2] Wang L, Zhang Y, Gu Y. Unsupervised Band Selection Method Based on Improved N-FINDR Algorithm for Spectral Unmixing. 2006 1st International Symposium on Systems and Control in Aerospace and Astronautics, Harbin, China, 2006.01.19.
[3] Geng X, Sun K, Ji L, et al. Scientific Reports, 2015, 5: 9915.
[4] Yu C, Song M, Chang C I. Remote Sensing, 2018, 10(1): 113.
[5] Geng X, Sun K, Ji L. Remote Sensing Letters, 2014, 5(2): 1022.
[6] WANG Li-yan, LI Chang-you, SUN Biao(王丽艳，李畅游，孙 标). Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering(环境工程学报), 2014, 8(12): 5527.
[7] WEN Xin-long, JING Yuan-shu, LI Ya-chun, et al(温新龙，景元书，李亚春，等). Environmental Science & Technology(环境科学与技术), 2014, 37(10): 149.
[8] FENG Chi, JIN Qi, WANG Yan-nan, et al(冯 驰，金 琦，王艳楠，等). Environmental Science(环境科学), 2015, 36(5): 1557.
[9] DU Cheng-gong, LI Yun-mei, WANG Qiao, et al(杜成功，李云梅，王 桥，等). Environmental Science(环境科学), 2016, 37(3): 862.
[10] WANG Yun-xia, YANG Guo-fan, LIN Mao-sen, et al(王云霞，杨国范，林茂森，等). Journal of Irrigation and Drainage(灌溉排水学报), 2017, 36(4): 105.
[11] MA Chi(马 驰). Wetland Science(湿地科学), 2017, 15(2): 173.
[12] PAN Jie, ZHANG Ying, TAN Zi-hui(潘 洁，张 鹰，谭子辉). Marine Sciences(海洋科学), 2011, 35(9): 85.
[13] XU Liang-jiang, HUANG Chang-chun, LI Yun-mei, et al(徐良将，黄昌春，李云梅，等). Remote Sensing Technology and Application(遥感技术与应用), 2013, 28(4): 681.
