基于TASI热红外数据的黑土土壤发射率光谱与土壤全钾含量关系研究

doi:10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2020)09-2862-07

摘要
参考文献
相关文章 (1)

全文: PDF (5317 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要：土壤钾元素含量是评价土壤营养程度重要的指标之一。利用热红外发射率(TASI)数据对钾元素的反演研究较少且模型精度较低。利用在黑龙江海伦地区采集的热红外航空成像光谱仪TASI数据，经过预处理和温度与发射率分离后，探究黑土土壤热红外发射率与钾元素含量关系。在对比了常规的多元逐步回归与偏最小二乘建模方法后，使用了一种新的逐步回归方法-全二次多元逐步回归建立模型，相对于常规多元逐步回归，引入了更多的参数进行模型的建立，有效提高反演精度。研究发现，土壤发射率数据对于选用有效特性波段建立的模型对钾元素具有较高的反演精度，所选特征波段均为负相关，波段分别为6（8.602 μm），11（9.150 μm），15（9.588 μm），23（10.464 μm），相关系数依次为-0.658，-0.673，-0.645和-0.627。钾元素通过多元逐步回归建模与预测的均方根误差RMSE：0.027和0.032，判定系数R²：0.667和0.82，相比于常规多元逐步回归建模与预测的均方根误差RMSE：0.031和0.031，判定系数R²：0.569和0.78与偏最小二乘法建模与预测的均方根误差RMSE：0.033和0.037，判定系数R²：0.45和0.51评价指标精度均有所提高，说明该方法有效提高了利用发射率数据对钾元素的反演精度。在利用学生化残差对模型进行去除异常值的改进后发现，建模精度有了明显提高但是测试精度却有所降低，过度拟合训练集数据导致模型泛化性下降，因此不建议对模型过度拟合。

关键词：黑土土壤；热红外航空成像光谱仪发射率；全钾含量；全二次多元逐步回归

Abstract：Potassium content in soil is one of the important indicators for evaluating soil nutrient levels. There are few studies using thermal infrared emissivity data to invert potassium, and the model accuracy is low. In this paper, the Thermal Airborne Hyperspectral Imager (TASI) data collected in the Hailun region of Northeast China is used to investigate the relationship between soil emissivity and potassium content in black soil after pretreatment and separation of temperature and emissivity. Compared with the constant multiple stepwise regression and partial least-square regression model, a new stepwise regression method- quadratic multiple stepwise regression is innovatively used to enhance the model. Compared with the constant multiple stepwise regression, more parameters are introduced to establish the model, which can effectively improve the inversion accuracy. It is found that the model which uses effective special selected bands has a higher inversion accuracy to the potassium element and the selected bands are negatively correlated. The bands are 6 (8.602 μm), 11 (9.150 μm), 15 (9.588 μm), and 23 (10.464 μm)and the correlation coefficients are -0.658, -0.673, -0.645, -0.627, respectively. The quadratic multiple stepwise regression model’s RMSE of the training and testing data are 0.027 and 0.032, the decision coefficient R² are 0.667 and 0.82. Compared to the constant multiple stepwise regression model’s RMSE of the training and testing data: 0.031 and 0.031, the decision coefficient R²: 0.569 and 0.78 and the least squares model’s RMSE: 0.033, 0.037, the judgment coefficient R²: 0.45, 0.51, the precisions of evalution indexes have been improved, it is indicated that this method effectively improved the inversion accuracy of the potassium element using the emissivity data. After using the studentized residuals to improve the model to remove the outliers, it is found that the training accuracy is significantly improved but the test accuracy is reduced. Over-fitting the training set data leads to the decline of the model generalization. Therefore, the model is not recommended to improve.

Key words：Black soil; Emissivity of the thermal airborne hyperspectral imager; Total potassium content; Quadratic multiple stepwise regression

收稿日期: 2019-07-31 修订日期: 2019-11-09

中图分类号:

TP722.5

基金资助: 国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(41602333)，东北黑土地1∶25万土地质量地球化学调查项目(DD20160316)资助

通讯作者: 秦凯 E-mail: h_rs_qk@163.com

作者简介: 李明，1993年生，核工业北京地质研究院遥感信息与图像分析技术国家级重点实验室工程师 e-mail: lm930507@sina.cn

引用本文:

李明，秦凯，赵宁博，田丰，赵英俊. 基于TASI热红外数据的黑土土壤发射率光谱与土壤全钾含量关系研究[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2020, 40(09): 2862-2868.
LI Ming, QIN Kai, ZHAO Ning-bo, TIAN Feng, ZHAO Ying-jun. Study on the Relationship Between Black Soil Emissivity Spectrum and Total Potassium Content Based on TASI Thermal Infrared Data. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(09): 2862-2868.

链接本文:

https://www.gpxygpfx.com/CN/10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2020)09-2862-07 或 https://www.gpxygpfx.com/CN/Y2020/V40/I09/2862

[1] ZHANG Dong-hui, ZHAO Ying-jun, QIN Kai, et al（张东辉, 赵英俊, 秦凯，等）. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering（农业工程学报）, 2018, 34(20): 141.
[2] LIU Huan-jun, WANG Xiang, ZHANG Xiao-kang, et al（刘焕军, 王翔, 张小康, 等）. Chinese Journal of Soil Science（土壤通报）, 2018, 49(1): 38.
[3] Zhou D K, Larar A M, Liu X. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 2018, 12(1)：1.
[4] SHI Yang, WANG Ru-jing, WANG Yu-bing（史杨, 王儒敬, 汪玉冰）. Chinese Journal of Luminescence（发光学报）, 2018, 39(10): 1458.
[5] XIE Wen, ZHAO Xiao-min, GUO Xi, et al（谢文, 赵小敏, 郭熙, 等）. Scientia Silvae Sinicae（林业科学）, 2018, 54(6): 16.
[6] CAO Wen-tao, WU Quan-yuan, WANG Fei, et al（曹文涛, 吴泉源, 王菲, 等）. Chinese Journal of Soil Science（土壤通报）, 2016, 47(2): 265.
[7] Wu W, Al-Shafie W M, Mhaimeed A S, et al. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2014, 7(11): 4442.
[8] Rocha Neto, Odílio, Teixeira A, et al. Remote Sensing, 2017, 9(42): 1.
[9] LI Yan, WANG Rang-hui, GUAN Yan-long, et al（李焱, 王让会, 管延龙，等）. Remote Sensing Technology and Application（遥感技术与应用）, 2017, 32(1): 173.
[10] WANG Xiang-feng, MENG Ji-hua（王祥峰, 蒙继华）. Remote Sensing Technology and Application（遥感技术与应用）, 2015, 30(6): 1033.
[11] CHEN Yuan-peng, ZHANG Shi-wen, LUO Ming, et al（陈元鹏, 张世文, 罗明, 等）. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery（农业机械学报）, 2019, 50(1): 170.
[12] ARDAK·Kelimu, TASHPOLAT·Tiyip, ZHANG Fei, et al（阿尔达克·克里木, 塔西甫拉提·特依拜, 张飞, 等）. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering（农业工程学报）, 2015, 31(17): 115.
[13] XIA Jun, ZHANG Fei（夏军, 张飞）. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis（光谱学与光谱分析）, 2019, 39(4): 1063.
[14] YANG Yong-min, QIU Jian-xiu, SU Hong-bo, et al（杨永民, 邱建秀, 苏红波，等）. Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves（红外与毫米波学报）, 2018, 37(4): 459.
[15] YANG Hang, ZHANG Li-fu, ZHANG Xue-wen, et al（杨杭, 张立福, 张学文，等）. Journal of Remote Sensing（遥感学报）, 2011, 15(6): 1242.