Determination of Na Element in NaCl Solution by Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy
LIN Xiao-mei1, GUO Ming1, WANG Xing-sheng2, GAO Xun2*
1. Department of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, Changchun University of Technology, Changchun 130012, China
2. School of Science, Changchun University of Science and Technology, Jilin 130022, China
Abstract：In order to study the detection sensitivity of Na elements in water, the Na elements in NaCl solution were detected by laser induced breakdown spectroscopy. Choosing NaⅠ589.0 nm and NaⅠ589.6 nm as analytical spectral lines, we used the NaCl solution with 6 kinds of concentration and adopted external standard method, internal standard method and wavelet transformation noise reduction method to present NaCl solution Na element calibration curve, finding that the linear correlation coefficient r of calibration curve obtained by using internal standard method is 0.998, better than that of calibration curve obtained by using external standard method (r=0.985), and is superior to the external standard method after wavelet noise reduction (r=0.986). In contrast, the wavelet transformation reduced the RSD from 5.68% to 1.61%, thereby reducing the LOD value from 50.8 to 19.54 μg·mL-1. The internal standard method selects the NaⅠ589.0 nm and NaⅠ589.6 nm sodium atomic line and the internal standard reference line HⅠ656.2 nm hydrogen atom line intensity ratio can effectively overcome the impact of experimental conditions fluctuations, therefore, the linear correlation coefficient of the calibration curve of Na element in NaCl solution obtained by using the internal standard method is the largest. For the wavelet transformation noise reduction processing method, the noise caused by the continuous background of the LIBS spectrum can be effectively reduced, and the influence of the experimental condition fluctuation on the LIBS spectral information cannot be overcome. Therefore, the wavelet variation noise reduction method can improve the RSD of the LIBS, but has little effect on -the improvement of the linear correlation coefficient of the calibration curve given by the external standard method after noise processing. It is indicated that the internal standard method effectively improves the detection sensitivity and reduces the influence of fluctuations in experimental conditions. The calibration curve has a better linear correlation. The wavelet transformation noise reduction process effectively reduces the continuous background spectral noise in the LIBS spectrum, and the LIBS detection limit becomes lower. The RSD and LOD values obtained by analyzing the line of NaⅠ589.0 nm are smaller than those of the line with the line NaⅠ589.6 nm. The upper levels of the two lines of NaⅠ589.0 nm and NaⅠ589.6 nm are 2.104 and 2.102 eV respectively. It was found that the upper level of the analytical line has an effect on the RSD and LOD values of the Na element in the NaCl solution, and the upper level is large, while the RSD and LOD values are small. The results of this study showed that LIBS technology can realize rapid detection of heavy metal elements in solution, and has potential application prospect in environmental water pollution detection.
林晓梅，郭 明，王兴生，高 勋. 激光诱导击穿光谱用于NaCl溶液中Na元素含量分析[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2019, 39(06): 1953-1957.
LIN Xiao-mei, GUO Ming, WANG Xing-sheng, GAO Xun. Determination of Na Element in NaCl Solution by Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(06): 1953-1957.
[1] Hahn D W, Omenetto N. Applied Spectroscopy, 2012, 66(4): 347.
[2] DU Chuang. GAO Xun, SHAO Yan, et al（杜 闯，高 勋，邵 妍，等）, Acta Physica Sinica（物理学报）, 2013, 62(4): 221.
[3] Bak M S, Mcgann B, Carter C, et al. Journal of Physics D：Applied Physics, 2016, 49(12): 125202.
[4] Wang J, Li X, Li H, et al. Applied Physics B, 2017, 123(4): 131.
[5] Heilbrunner H, Huber N, Wolfmeir H, et al. Applied Physics A, 2012, 106(1): 15.
[6] HU Li, ZHAO Nan-jing, LIU Wen-qing, et al(胡 丽, 赵南京, 刘文清, 等). Journal of Optics(光学学报), 2015, 36(6): 314.
[7] ZHANG Qiao, HU Zhen-hua, DING Lei, et al(张 巧, 胡振华, 丁 蕾, 等). China Laser(中国激光), 2013, 40(2): 236.
[8] YU Chun-zi, YU Wei-jia, YANG Chao, et al(禹纯子, 俞卫佳, 杨 超, 等). Journal of Atomic and Molecular Physics(原子与分子物理学报), 2017, 34(1)：95.
[9] YAN Jing, DING Lei, GE Lin-lin, et al(闫 静, 丁 蕾, 葛琳琳, 等). China Laser(中国激光), 2012, 39(2): 210.
[10] Skočovská K, Novotny J, Prochazka D, et al. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2016, 87(4): 233.
[11] Ahmed R, Iqbal J, Aslam Baig M. Laser Physics Letters, 2015, 12(6)：066102.
[12] ZHENG Pei-chao, LIU Hong-di, WANG Jin-mei, et al(郑培超, 刘红弟, 王金梅, 等). Journal of Photon(光子学报), 2014, 43(9): 82.
[13] Guo Y M, Deng L M, Yang X Y, et al. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2017, 32(12)：2401.
[14] Zou X H, Guo L B, Shen M, et al. Optics Express, 2014, 22(9): 10233.
[15] SONG Chao, ZHANG Ya-wei, GAO Xun, et al(宋 超, 张亚维, 高 勋，等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2017, 37(6): 1885.
