%A %T Flame Retardant Mechanism Investigation of Thermoplastic Polyurethane Composite/Ammonium Polyphosphate/Aluminum Hydroxide Composites Based on Spectroscopy Analysis %0 Journal Article %D 2021 %J SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS %R 10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2021)12-3901-08 %P 3901-3908 %V 41 %N 12 %U {https://www.gpxygpfx.com/CN/abstract/article_12410.shtml} %8 2021-12-01 %X Ammonium polyphosphate (APP) and aluminum hydroxide (ATH) was introduced to prepare a series of ammonium polyphosphate/aluminum hydroxide/thermoplastic polyurethane composites (TPU/APP/ATH) by melting blending technology. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and laser Raman spectroscopy test were applied to investigate micro-morphology, surface structure, elemental composition, bonding state and graphitization degree of the char residue for TPU and flame retardant TPU composites, which combined with flame retardant tests to discover synergistic flame retardant mechanism of APP and ATH. SEM analysis revealed that TPU/APP/ATH char residue had less void structure and higher densification than APP and ATH alone. XPS revealed that the content of the C element in FR-TPU slag decreased compared with pure TPU, while the content of the O element increased. In these samples, the content of C element in TPU/APP10/ATH10 decreased from 88.2% to 69.24%, the content of O element increased from 8.07% to 17.78%. Compared with TPU/APP20 and TPU/ATH20, the content of P and Al element in TPU/APP10/ATH10 were decreased to 3.91% and 3.31%, respectively. Furthermore, peak fitting for bonding state of C element showed that C—C/C—H, C—O/C—N and CO/CN structure in char residue of TPU was 61.05%, 35.65% and 3.30%. In comparison, those in char residue of TPU/APP10/ATH10 were 45.38%, 45.00% and 9.63%, indicating ATH and APP facilitated the formation of ester, ether, carbonyl, the carboxylic acid (salt), ester group, et al. Peak fitting for the binding state of O element showed that O2/H2O,—O— and O structure in char residue of TPU were 28.75%, 44.36% and 26.89%, compared with 44.33%, 32.78% and 22.89% in char residue of TPU/APP10/ATH10, indicating that the addition of APP or/and ATH was conducive to the formation of O2/H2O structure of O elements. Peak fitting for bonding state of N element showed that —NH— and N structure in char residue of TPU was 40.93% and 59.07%, compared with 47.17% and 52.83% in char residue of TPU/APP10/ATH10, implying ATH and APP promoted the formation of —NH— structure. The Raman spectroscopy test showed that the char layers of TPU/APP10/ATH10 were more graphitized and densified than the sample with APP and ATH used alone. Based on the above researches and flame-retardant tests, the flame retardancy mechanism of TPU/APP/ATH composites can be obtained as follows: ATH was thermally decomposed into alumina, which absorbed heat and released large amounts of water vapor, effectively facilitating APP degradation, producing incombustible ammonia and polyphosphoric acid, which diluted the concentration of flammable gas. As the temperature continued to rise, alumina reacts with polyphosphoric acid to form aluminum metaphosphate (Al(PO3)3), which synchronously catalyzes the carbonization of the polyurethane matrix to form a highly graphitized char layer. The graphitized char layer covered the surface of the matrix together with aluminum metaphosphate, effectively inhibiting the transport of substances and energy in the combustion area, thus achieving flame retardation.