|
|
|
|
|
|
| In-situ Absolute Intensity Calibration of Fast-Response Extreme Ultraviolet Spectrometer on Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak |
| YANG Xiu-da, ZHANG Ling*, XU Zong, ZHANG Peng-fei, CHEN Ying-jie, HUANG Juan, WU Zhen-wei, |
| Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (ASIPP)，Hefei 230026, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract In the magnetic confinement device, the existence of impurity, especially the high-Z impurity, will cause the large enhancement of the radiation power loss and serious degradation of plasma performance. Quantitative study of impurity behavior requires the absolute intensity calibration of spectroscopy diagnostic system for impurity firstly. In this work, a precise in-situ absolute intensity calibration of a fast-response flat-field extreme ultraviolet (EUV) spectrometer is carried out by using different methods in different wavelength range. In the range of 20～150Å, the sensitivity curve is obtained by comparing EUV bremsstrahlung between the measurement and calculation, in which the latter one is calculated by combining the profile of electron density, temperature and the effective charge Zeff deduced from the absolutely measured visible bremsstrahlung intensity in the range of (523±1) nm. The measured EUV bremsstrahlung intensity is the continuous counts subtracting the background noise at different wavelengths from the detector. In the longer wavelength range, i. e. 130～280Å, the relative intensity calibration is addressed by comparing the measured and simulated line intensity ratio of resonance transition doubles from Li-like ions, e. g. Fe23+, Cr21+, Ar15+, and Na-like ions, e. g. Mo31+, Fe15+, with the transition of 1s22s2S1/2 —1s22p2P1/2, 3/2 and 2p63s2S1/2—2p63p2P1/2, 3/2, respectively. For the simulated line intensity ratio, it is modeled using the collisional-radiative model, in which the energy level populations are determined by electron collisional excitation, de-excitation and radiative decay. By combining those two methods, the absolute calibration of EUV spectrometer is achieved in the wavelength range of 20～280Å. In addition, the uncertainty of the calibration is estimated to be about 30%, considering the measurement uncertainties of electron temperature, electron density and bremsstrahlung. Based on the obtained absolute sensitivity curve, the quantitative study of impurity concentration is being carried out by comparing the absolute measurement of emission line intensity with that simulated by combining the one-dimensional impurity transport simulation and ADAS (Atomic Data and Analysis Structure) database.
|
|
Received: 2016-12-12
Accepted: 2017-04-19
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
ZHANG Ling
E-mail: zhangling@ipp.ac.cn
|
|
[1] Wan B, Li J, Guo H, et al. Nuclear Fusion, 2015, 55 (10): 104015.
[2] Lepson J K, Beiersdorfer P, Clementson J, et al. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 2010, 43(14): 144018.
[3] Chowdhuri M B, Morita S, Goto M, et al. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2007, 78(2): 023501.
[4] Cui Z, Zhou H, Morita S, et al. Plasma Science and Technology, 2013, 15(2): 110.
[5] ZHANG Ling, WU Zhen-wei, GAO Wei, et al(张 凌，吴振伟，高 伟, 等). Journal of Atomic and Molecular Physics(原子与分子物理学报), 2013, 5(30): 779.
[6] Dong C, Morita S, Goto M, et al. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2011, 82(11): 113102.
[7] CUI Zheng-ying, GAO Ya-dong, FU Bing-zhong, et al(崔正英，高亚东，傅炳忠, 等). Nuclear Fusion and Plasma Physics(核聚变与等离子体物理), 2011, 1(31): 1.
[8] Zhang L, Morita S, Xu Z, et al. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2015, 86(12): 123509.
[9] ZHANG Peng-fei, ZHANG Ling, XU Zong, et al(张鹏飞，张 凌，许 棕，等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2016, 36(7): 2134.
[10] Chen Y, Wu Z, Gao W, et al. Fusion Engineering and Design, 2013, 88(11): 2825.
[11] Liu Y, Schmuck S, Zhao H, et al. Plasma Science and Technology，2016, 18(12): 1148.
[12] Wang Y, Gao X, Ling B, et al. Fusion Engineering and Design, 2013, 88(11): 2950.
[13] Liu H, Jie Y, Ding W, et al. Journal of Instrumentation, 2013, 8(11): C11002.
[14] Lawson K D, Coffey I H, Zacks J et al. Journal of Instrumentation, 2009, 4(4): P04013.
[15] Yang X, Zhang L, Xu Z, et al. Impurity Density Evaluation on EAST, A3 Foresight Program Workshop, Yinchuan, China, 17-20 May 2016. |
| [1] |
YE Da-wei1, 2, DING Fang1*, LI Ke-dong1, 2, CHEN Xia-hua1, 2, LUO Yu1, 2, ZHANG Qing1, 2, MENG Ling-yi1, 2, LUO Guang-nan1, 2. Study on Time Delay of Impurity Line Emissions Between in the Edge and Core Plasmas in EAST Tokamak[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(11): 3507-3511. |
| [2] |
YAO Li-ming1, 2, ZHANG Ling3*, XU Zong4, 5, YANG Xiu-da6, WU Cheng-rui6, ZHANG Rui-rui3, YANG Fei3, WU Zhen-wei3, YAO Jian-ming3, GONG Xian-zu3, HU Li-qun3. In-Situ Wavelength Calibration of Fast-Response Extreme Ultraviolet Spectrometers on Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak and Its Application[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(08): 2645-2650. |
| [3] |
HU Guang-chun, ZHANG Wei-guang. Simulation of the Depth Profile of Tritium Based on X-Ray Spectrum Measurement[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2011, 31(03): 831-834. |
|
|
|
|
