基于中红外光谱技术鉴别转基因大豆的方法研究

doi:10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2017)03-0760-06

Abstract
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (2957 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Transgenic technology has enormous significance in increasing food production, protecting biodiversity and reducing the use of chemical pesticides and so on. However, there may be some security risks; therefore, research on genetically modified crop identification technology is attracting more and more attention. Mid-infrared spectroscopy combined with feature extraction methods were used to investigate the feasibility of identifying different kinds of transgenic soybeans in the wavelength range of 3 818～734 cm^-1. For this purpose, partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) was employed as pattern recognition methods to classify three non-GMO parent soybeans(HC6, JACK and W82)and their transgenic soybeans. The results of the calibration set were 96.67%, 96.67% and 83.33% for three non-GMO parent soybeans and their transgenic soybeans, and the results of the prediction set were 83.33%, 85% and 85%. X-loading weights, variable importance in the projection (VIP) algorithm and second derivative (2-Der) algorithm were applied to select sensitive wavenumbers. The sensitive wavelengths selected with x-loading weights were used to build PLS-DA model, the classification accuracy of the calibration set were 91.11%, 91.67% and 81.67%, and the results of the prediction set were 80%, 80% and 75%. By using the VIP algorithm, the classification accuracy of the calibration set were 94.44%, 95% and 76.67%, and the results of the prediction set were 80%, 85% and 75%. By using the 2-Der algorithm, the classification accuracy of the calibration set were 88.89%, 81.67% and 80%, and the results of the prediction set were 76.67%, 75% and 75%. Principal components analysis (PCA) and independent component analysis (ICA) were applied to extract feature information. The principal components were combined with PLS-DA model. The classification accuracy of the calibration set were 96.67%, 90% and 80%, and the results of the prediction set were 80%, 90% and 80%. The independent components were combined with PLS-DA model. The classification accuracy of the calibration set were 93.33%, 83.33% and 83.33% while the results of the prediction set were 83.33%, 75% and 75%. The overall results indicated that mid-infrared spectroscopy could accurately identify the varieties of the non-GMO parent soybeans, which provided a new idea for nondestructive testing of transgenic soybeans. Feature extraction methods could be used to build more concise models and reduce the amount of program operations combined with sensitive wavenumbers selection methods.

Key words： Mid-infrared hyperspectral spectroscopy Transgenic soybean Effective wovenumbers selection Feature extraction

Received: 2016-03-22 Accepted: 2016-07-18

ZTFLH:

O433.4

Corresponding Authors: BAO Yi-dan E-mail: ydbao@zju.edu.cn

Cite this article:

FANG Hui,ZHANG Zhao,WANG Hai-long, et al. Identification of Transgenic Soybean Varieties Using Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy [J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2017, 37(03): 760-765.

URL:

http://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2017)03-0760-06 OR http://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/Y2017/V37/I03/760

[1] James C. Chinese Journal of Biomedical Engineering(中国生物工程杂志), 2015, 35(1): 1.
[2] James C. Chinese Journal of Biomedical Engineering(中国生物工程杂志), 2014, 34(1): 1.
[3] WANG Guang-yin, FAN Wen-xiu, CHEN Bi-hua, et al(王广印, 范文秀, 陈碧华, 等). Food Science(食品科学), 2008, 29(10)：698.
[4] SU Rui, XIONG Yan, QING Hong, et al(苏锐, 熊嫣, 庆宏, 等). Chemistry(化学通报), 2012,75(2): 121.
[5] LUO A-dong, JIAO Yan-chao, CAO Yun-heng, et al(罗阿东, 焦彦朝, 曹云恒, 等). Journal of Southern Argiculture(南方农业学报), 2012, 43(3): 290.
[6] Shen P L, Geng F Z, Yu Y, et al. Food Control, 2016, 62: 357.
[7] Kanakis Charalabos D, Petrakis Eleftherios A, Kimbaris Athanasios C, et al. Phytochemical Analysis, 2012, 23(1): 34.
[8] LI Qiao-ling, LIU Feng, SONG Si-yuan, et al(李巧玲, 刘峰, 宋思远, 等). Science & Technology of Food Industry(食品工业科技), 2014, 35(22): 73, 80.
[9] Aouidi Fathia, Dupuy Nathalie, Artaud Jacques, et al. Food Chemistry, 2012, 131(1): 360.
[10] Santos P M, Pereira Filho E R, Rodriguez Saona L E. Food Chemistry, 2013, 138(1): 19.
[11] Cozzolino Daniel, Cynkar Wies, Shah Nevil, et al. Food Analytical Methods, 2013, 5(3): 381.
[12] ZHU Zhe-yan, LIU Fei, ZHANG Chu, et al(朱哲燕, 刘飞, 张初, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2014, 34(7): 1944.
[13] Vermeulen Ph, PiernaJ A Fernandez, Abbas O, et al. Food Chemistry, 2015, 189(SI): 19.
[14] Mossoba Magdi M, Srigley Cynthia Tyburczy, Farris Samantha, et al. Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society, 2014, 91(10): 1651.
[15] Kokalj Meta, Stih Karmen, Kreft Samo. Planta Medica, 2014, 80(12): 1023.
[16] Trygg J, Wold S. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 1998, 42(1-2): 209.
[17] Pierre Comon. Signal Processing, 1994, 36(3): 287.
[18] Ferreira Daniela Souza, Poppi Ronei Jesus, Lima PalloneJuliana Azevedo. Journal of Cereal Science, 2015, 64: 43.
[19] LI Ben-xiang, DONG Xin-rong(李本祥, 董新荣). Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis Part B: Chemical Analysis(理化检验B: 化学分册), 2013, 49(11): 1301.
[20] Etzion Y, Linker R, Cogan U, et al. Journal of Dairy Science, 2004, 87: 2779.
[21] Inon F A, Garrigues S, de la Guardia M. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2004, 513(2): 401.
[22] Aernouts Ben, Polshin Evgeny, Saeys Wouter. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2011, 705(1-2): 88.