基于激光诱导击穿光谱技术的土壤快速分类方法研究

doi:10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2017)01-0241-06

Abstract
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (1638 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Soil classification is an important research content in soil science field. It is the basis of soil survey and resource evaluation which is important to agricultural production. There are many soil classification standards all over the world. China has two kinds of classifications including soil genetic classification and soil system classification. There are great differences between different types of soil elements, so it is feasible for soil classification to use laser induced breakdown spectroscopy. Laser induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) is a new element analysis technology which uses a laser pulse with high energy density to ablate samples. LIBS has been used in many fields including environmental protection and industrial production control. It can directly reflect the difference of element content in different soils. The experimental setup including an Nd: YAG laser, a spectrometer, a computer and a rotating platform. In the experiment 7 kinds of soil (red soil, brick red soil, lateritic red soil, paddy soil, cinnamon, alluvial soil and alpine meadow soil) including 25 samples were used. All soil samples were grinded and sieved before the experiment.Under the same experimental condition, the temperatures of the plasma created by the laser pulses on the surface of the different soil samples have great differences. The lateritic red soil had the highest temperature, and the alpine meadow soil had the lowest. But it was not enough to form the basis for classification. Therefore six constant elements including Si, Fe, Al, Mg, Ca and Ti were selected and their spectral line intensity were treated as classification index. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to simplify the classification process. The PCA method could simplify the 6 indexes to few independent indexes which could also reflect the spectral information of the 6 elements. The original spectral data was processed by Matlab. The process consisted of spectral background removal, characteristic spectrum identify and extraction. The classification results showed a three--dimensional figure. Except alpine meadow soil which varied in element concentrations 6 kinds of soils achieved good classification. The brick red soil and lateritic red soil varied in PC1, but their PC2s and PC3s were the same. The two kinds of soil overlapped with each other and they couldn’t be separated. Back-propagation artificial network was also used to achieve soil classification. The classification results were the same with the PCA. Some brick red soil and lateritic red soil samples were identified inaccurately. When the PC1, 2, 3 were used as the input of the BP-neural network, the classification had much better accuracy because less input improved the performance of the BP-neural network. Only one alpine meadow soil sample was identified to cinnamon soil. When the plasma temperature was also taken into account, all the soil samples could be distinguished. The results showed that LIBS could be used to classify soils based on their element content differences. The PCA, soil plasma temperature and BP-neural network were useful tools to achieve soil classification. The LIBS provides a useful tool for general detailed soil survey and rational utilization of soil.

Key words：Laser induced breakdown spectroscopy;Soil classification;Principal component analysis;Back-propagation artificial neural network

Received: 2015-10-13 Accepted: 2016-03-06

ZTFLH:

S155.1

Corresponding Authors: ZHAO Nan-jing E-mail: njzhao@aiofm.ac.cn

Cite this article:

MENG De-shuo,ZHAO Nan-jing,MA Ming-jun, et al. Rapid Soil Classification with Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy [J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2017, 37(01): 241-246.

URL:

https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2017)01-0241-06 OR https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/Y2017/V37/I01/241

[1] GONG Zi-tong, ZHANG Gan-lin, CHEN Zhi-cheng，et al(龚子同，张甘霖，陈志诚，等). Chinese Journal of Soil Science(土壤通报)，2002, 33(1): 1.
[2] CHEN Huai-man(陈怀满). Environmental Soil Science(环境土壤学). Beijing: Science Press(北京：科学出版社), 2010. 90.
[3] SHI Zhou, WANG Qian-long, PENG Jie, et al(史舟，王乾龙，彭杰，等). Science China: Earth Science(中国科学：地球科学)，2014, 44(5)：978.
[4] Vasques G M, Dematte J A, Viscarra Rossel, et al. Geoderma，2014, 223(7): 73.
[5] Dematte Jose A M, Bellinaso H, Romero D J, et al. Science Agricola，2014, 71(6): 509.
[6] ZHANG Si-chong, ZHOU Xiao-cong, YE Hua-xiang, et al(张思冲，周晓聪，叶华香，等). Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin(中国农学通报)，2009, 25(13)：230.
[7] Michela Corsi, Gabriele Cristoforetti, Montserrat Hidalgo, et al. Applied Geochemistry，2006，21: 748.
[8] Gaft Michael，Nagli, et al. Applied Spectroscopy, 2014, 68(9): 1004.
[9] Dutouquet C, Gallou G, Le Bihan O, et al. Talanta, 2014, 127(1): 75.
[10] El Haddad J, Bruyere D, Ismael A. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy, 2014, 97(1): 57.
[11] ZHANG Jun-ning, FANG Xian-fa, ZHANG Xiao-chao, et al(张俊宁，方宪法，张小超，等). Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery(农业机械学报)，2014, 45(10)：294.
[12] HUANG Ying-feng, LIU Teng-hui(黄应丰，刘腾辉). Acta Pedologica Sinica(土壤学报)，1995, 32(1): 58.
[13] HU Zhen-hua, ZHANG Qiao, DING Lei, et al(胡振华，张巧，丁蕾，等). Acta Optica Sinica(光学学报)，2013, 33(4): 295.
[14] YU Qi, MA Xiao-hong, WANG Rui, et al(余琦，马晓红，王锐，等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析)，2014，34(11): 3095.
[15] SUN Lan-xiang, YU Hai-bin, CONG Zhi-bo, et al(孙兰香，于海滨，从智博，等). Acta Optica Sinica(光学学报), 2010, 30(9): 2757.