光谱学与光谱分析 |
|
|
|
|
|
Optimized Spectral Indices Based Estimation of Forage Grass Biomass |
AN Hai-bo1, LI Fei1, ZHAO Meng-li1*, LIU Ya-jun2 |
1. College of Ecology and Environmental Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Huhhot 010019, China 2. People’s Government of Mujia Yingzi Town, Chifeng 024005, China |
|
|
Abstract As an important indicator of forage production, aboveground biomass will directly illustrate the growth of forage grass. Therefore, Real-time monitoring biomass of forage grass play a crucial role in performing suitable grazing and management in artificial and natural grassland. However, traditional sampling and measuring are time-consuming and labor-intensive. Recently, development of hyperspectral remote sensing provides the feasibility in timely and nondestructive deriving biomass of forage grass. In the present study, the main objectives were to explore the robustness of published and optimized spectral indices in estimating biomass of forage grass in natural and artificial pasture. The natural pasture with four grazing density (control, light grazing, moderate grazing and high grazing) was designed in desert steppe, and different forage cultivars with different N rate were conducted in artificial forage fields in Inner Mongolia. The canopy reflectance and biomass in each plot were measured during critical stages. The result showed that, due to the influence in canopy structure and biomass, the canopy reflectance have a great difference in different type of forage grass. The best performing spectral index varied in different species of forage grass with different treatments (R2=0.00~0.69). The predictive ability of spectral indices decreased under low biomass of desert steppe, while red band based spectral indices lost sensitivity under moderate-high biomass of forage maize. When band combinations of simple ratio and normalized difference spectral indices were optimized in combined datasets of natural and artificial grassland, optimized spectral indices significant increased predictive ability and the model between biomass and optimized spectral indices had the highest R2 (R2=0.72) compared to published spectral indices. Sensitive analysis further confirmed that the optimized index had the lowest noise equivalent and were the best performing index in estimating biomass. In conclusion, optimizing wavebands combination was a promising algorithm for improving prediction abilities of biomass for forage grass.
|
Received: 2014-06-27
Accepted: 2014-10-25
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
ZHAO Meng-li, LIU Ya-jun
E-mail: nmgmlzh@126.com; lifei@imau.edu.cn
|
|
[1] FAN Yue-jun, HOU Xiang-yang, SHI Hong-xiao, et al(范月君,侯向阳,石红霄). Acta Prataculturae Sinica(草业学报), 2012, 21(3): 294. [2] LIU Hong-lai, LU Wei-hua, CHEN Chao(刘洪来,鲁为华,陈 超). Acta Agrestia Sinica(草地学报),2013, 19(5): 865. [3] YANG Xiao-xia, REN Fei, ZHOU Hua-kun, et al(杨晓霞,任 飞,周华坤,等). Journal of Plant Ecology(植物生态学报),2014, 38(2): 161. [4] NIU Zhi-chun, NI Shao-xiang(牛志春, 倪少祥). Acta Geographica Sinica(地理学报), 2003, 58(5): 696. [5] WANG Xun, LIU Shu-jie, ZHANG Jia-wei, et al(王 迅,刘书杰,张家卫,等). Remote Sensing for Land & Resources(国土资源遥感), 2013, 25(3): 183. [6] LIU Zhan-yu, HUANG Jing-feng, WU Xin-hong, et al(刘占宇, 黄敬峰, 吴新宏,等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2006, 22(2): 111. [7] ZHANG Hong-bin, YANG Gui-xia, HUANG Qing, et al(张宏斌,杨桂霞,黄 青,等). Acta Prataculturae Sinica(草业学报), 2009, 18(1): 134. [8] Li Fei, Bodo Mistele, Hu Yuncai, et al. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2013, 180: 45. [9] Li Fei, Bodo Mistele, Hu Yuncai, et al. European Journal of Agronomy, 2013, 52: 199. [10] Hatfield J L, Gitelson A A, Schepers J S, et al. Application of Spectral Remote Sensing for Agronomic Decisions, 2008, 100: 117. [11] Li Fei, Yu Xinmiao, Guo Huifeng, et al. Field Corps Research, 2014, 157: 111. [12] Mutanga O, Skidmore A K. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2004, 25(19): 4011. |
[1] |
BAO Hao1, 2,ZHANG Yan1, 2*. Research on Spectral Feature Band Selection Model Based on Improved Harris Hawk Optimization Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 148-157. |
[2] |
HUANG You-ju1, TIAN Yi-chao2, 3*, ZHANG Qiang2, TAO Jin2, ZHANG Ya-li2, YANG Yong-wei2, LIN Jun-liang2. Estimation of Aboveground Biomass of Mangroves in Maowei Sea of Beibu Gulf Based on ZY-1-02D Satellite Hyperspectral Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3906-3915. |
[3] |
LI Zhong-bing1, 2, JIANG Chuan-dong2, LIANG Hai-bo3, DUAN Hong-ming2, PANG Wei2. Rough and Fine Selection Strategy Binary Gray Wolf Optimization
Algorithm for Infrared Spectral Feature Selection[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3067-3074. |
[4] |
GUO Zhou-qian1, 2, LÜ Shu-qiang1, 2, HOU Miao-le1, 2*, SUN Yu-tong1, 2, LI Shu-yang1, 2, CUI Wen-yi1. Inversion of Salt Content in Simulated Mural Based on Hyperspectral
Mural Salt Index[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3272-3279. |
[5] |
LI Xin1, LIU Jiang-ping1, 2*, HUANG Qing1, HU Peng-wei1, 2. Optimization of Prediction Model for Milk Fat Content Based on Improved Whale Optimization Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2779-2784. |
[6] |
LÜ Shi-lei1, 2, 3, WANG Hong-wei1, LI Zhen1, 2, 3*, ZHOU Xu1, ZHAO Jing1. Hyperspectral Identification Model of Cantonese Tangerine Peel Based on BWO-SVM Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2894-2901. |
[7] |
FENG Hai-kuan1, 2, YUE Ji-bo3, FAN Yi-guang2, YANG Gui-jun2, ZHAO Chun-jiang1, 2*. Estimation of Potato Above-Ground Biomass Based on VGC-AGB Model and Hyperspectral Remote Sensing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2876-2884. |
[8] |
GAO Yu1, SUN Xue-jian1*, LI Guang-hua2, ZHANG Li-fu1, QU Liang2, ZHANG Dong-hui1, CHANG Jing-jing2, DAI Xiao-ai3. Study on the Derivation of Paper Viscosity Spectral Index Based on Spectral Information Expansion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2960-2966. |
[9] |
SONG Cheng-yang1, GENG Hong-wei1, FEI Shuai-peng2, LI Lei2, GAN Tian2, ZENG Chao-wu3, XIAO Yong-gui2*, TAO Zhi-qiang2*. Study on Yield Estimation of Wheat Varieties Based on Multi-Source Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(07): 2210-2219. |
[10] |
XU Qi-lei, GUO Lu-yu, DU Kang, SHAN Bao-ming, ZHANG Fang-kun*. A Hybrid Shrinkage Strategy Based on Variable Stable Weighted for Solution Concentration Measurement in Crystallization Via ATR-FTIR Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(05): 1413-1418. |
[11] |
CAO Yue1, BAO Ni-sha1, 2*, ZHOU Bin3, GU Xiao-wei1, 2, LIU Shan-jun1, YU Mo-li1. Research on Remote Sensing Inversion Method of Surface Moisture Content of Iron Tailings Based on Measured Spectra and Domestic Gaofen-5 Hyperspectral High-Resolution Satellites[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(04): 1225-1233. |
[12] |
LUO Sen1, 2, REN Hong-rui1*, ZHANG Yue-qi1. Estimation of Grassland Green Biomass Using Sentinel-1A SLC Image Spectral Characteristics[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(03): 955-961. |
[13] |
LI Xiao-kai, YU Hai-ye, YU Yue, WANG Hong-jian, ZHANG Lei, ZHANG Xin, SUI Yuan-yuan*. Inversion Model of Clorophyll Content in Rice Based on a Bonic
Optimization Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(01): 93-99. |
[14] |
HU Yi-bin1, BAO Ni-sha1, 2*, LIU Shan-jun1, 2, MAO Ya-chun1, 2, SONG Liang3. Research on Hyperspectral Features and Recognition Methods of Typical Camouflage Materials[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(01): 297-302. |
[15] |
ZHANG Fu1, 2, 3, WANG Xin-yue2, CUI Xia-hua2, CAO Wei-hua2, ZHANG Xiao-dong1*, ZHANG Ya-kun2. Classification of Qianxi Tomatoes by Visible/Near Infrared Spectroscopy Combined With GMO-SVM[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(10): 3291-3297. |
|
|
|
|