| 光谱学与光谱分析 |
|
|
|
|
|
| A Hyperspectral Imagery Anomaly Detection Algorithm Based on Gauss-Markov Model |
| GAO Kun1, LIU Ying1, WANG Li-jing1,2, ZHU Zhen-yu1, CHENG Hao-bo1 |
1. Key Laboratory of Photoelectronic Imaging Technology and System, Beijing Institute of Technology, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100081, China
2. Academy of Opto-Electronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract With the development of spectral imaging technology, hyperspectral anomaly detection is getting more and more widely used in remote sensing imagery processing. The traditional RX anomaly detection algorithm neglects spatial correlation of images. Besides, it doesnot validly reduce the data dimension, which costs too much processing time and shows low validity on hyperspectral data. The hyperspectral images follow Gauss-Markov Random Field (GMRF) in space and spectral dimensions. The inverse matrix of covariance matrix is able to be directly calculated by building the Gauss-Markov parameters, which avoids the huge calculation of hyperspectral data. This paper proposes an improved RX anomaly detection algorithm based on three-dimensional GMRF. The hyperspectral imagery data is simulated with GMRF model, and the GMRF parameters are estimated with the Approximated Maximum Likelihood method. The detection operator is constructed with GMRF estimation parameters. The detecting pixel is considered as the centre in a local optimization window, which calls GMRF detecting window. The abnormal degree is calculated with mean vector and covariance inverse matrix, and the mean vector and covariance inverse matrix are calculated within the window. The image is detected pixel by pixel with the moving of GMRF window. The traditional RX detection algorithm, the regional hypothesis detection algorithm based on GMRF and the algorithm proposed in this paper are simulated with AVIRIS hyperspectral data. Simulation results show that the proposed anomaly detection method is able to improve the detection efficiency and reduce false alarm rate. We get the operation time statistics of the three algorithms in the same computer environment. The results show that the proposed algorithm improves the operation time by 45.2%, which shows good computing efficiency.
|
|
Received: 2014-07-07
Accepted: 2014-11-08
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
GAO Kun
E-mail: gaokun@bit.edu.cn
|
|
[1] TONG Qing-xi, ZHANG Bing, ZHENG Lan-fen(童庆禧，张 兵，郑兰芬). Hyperspectral Remote Sensing: Principle, Technology and Application(高光谱遥感：原理、技术与应用). Beijing: Higher Education Press(北京：高等教育出版社)，2006. 5.
[2] Susan M Schweizer, José M F Moura. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2000, 46(5): 1855.
[3] Reed Irvubg S, Yu Xiaoli. IEEE Trans Acoustic Speech Signal Process, 1990, 38(10): 1760.
[4] ZHAO Chun-hui, LI Jie, MEI Feng(赵春晖, 李 杰, 梅 锋). J. Infrared Millim. Waves(红外与毫米波学报), 2010: 29(5): 378.
[5] PU Xiao-feng, LEI Wu-hu, ZHANG Lin-hu, et al(蒲晓丰，雷武虎，张林虎，等). Journal of Image and Graphics(中国图像图形学报)，2011，16(9)：1632.
[6] Susan M Schweizer, Josd M F Moura. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2001, 10(4): 584.
[7] WANG Si-bo, YANG Chun-ling(王斯博, 杨春玲). Infrared Technology(红外技术), 2010, 32(4): 204.
[8] Chang C I, Chiang S S. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2002, 40(6): 1314.
[9] DI Wei, PAN Quan, ZHAO Yong-qiang, et al(邸 韡, 潘 泉, 赵永强, 等). Journal Of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles And Guidance(弹箭与制导学报), 2007, 27(2): 17.
[10] Julian Meng, Andrew E Marble, Yun Zhang. Proceedings. of SPIE, 2005, 5806, doi: 10.1117/12.602706.
[11] Huck Alexis, Guillaume Mireille, Chen W, et al. Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing (WHISPERS), 2011. 6080941.
[12] Dong Chao, Zhao Huijie, Li Na, et al. Proc. SPIE，2007，6789：67891V. |
| [1] |
WANG Cai-ling1，ZHANG Jing1，WANG Hong-wei2*, SONG Xiao-nan1, JI Tong3. A Hyperspectral Image Classification Model Based on Band Clustering and Multi-Scale Structure Feature Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 258-265. |
| [2] |
GAO Hong-sheng1, GUO Zhi-qiang1*, ZENG Yun-liu2, DING Gang2, WANG Xiao-yao2, LI Li3. Early Classification and Detection of Kiwifruit Soft Rot Based on
Hyperspectral Image Band Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 241-249. |
| [3] |
ZHANG Fu1, 2, WANG Xin-yue1, CUI Xia-hua1, YU Huang1, CAO Wei-hua1, ZHANG Ya-kun1, XIONG Ying3, FU San-ling4*. Identification of Maize Varieties by Hyperspectral Combined With Extreme Learning Machine[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2928-2934. |
| [4] |
TANG Ting, PAN Xin*, LUO Xiao-ling, GAO Xiao-jing. Fusion of ConvLSTM and Multi-Attention Mechanism Network for
Hyperspectral Image Classification[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2608-2616. |
| [5] |
LIANG Wan-jie1, FENG Hui2, JIANG Dong3, ZHANG Wen-yu1, 4, CAO Jing1, CAO Hong-xin1*. Early Recognition of Sclerotinia Stem Rot on Oilseed Rape by Hyperspectral Imaging Combined With Deep Learning[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(07): 2220-2225. |
| [6] |
WANG Guang-lai, WANG En-feng, WANG Cong-cong, LIU Da-yang*. Early Bruise Detection of Crystal Pear Based on Hyperspectral Imaging Technology and Transfer Learning[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(11): 3626-3630. |
| [7] |
XIANG Song-yang1, 3, XU Zhang-hua1, 2, 4, 5, 6*, ZHANG Yi-wei1, 2, ZHANG Qi1, 3, ZHOU Xin1, 2, YU Hui1, 3, LI Bin1, 2, LI Yi-fan1, 2. Construction and Application of ReliefF-RFE Feature Selection Algorithm for Hyperspectral Image Classification[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(10): 3283-3290. |
| [8] |
DAI Ruo-chen1, TANG Huan2*, TANG Bin1*, ZHAO Ming-fu1, DAI Li-yong1, ZHAO Ya3, LONG Zou-rong1, ZHONG Nian-bing1. Study on Detection Method of Foxing on Paper Artifacts Based on
Hyperspectral Imaging Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(05): 1567-1571. |
| [9] |
WANG Sheng-ming1, WANG Tao1*, TANG Sheng-jin2, SU Yan-zhao1. Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection Based on 3D Convolutional
Autoencoder Network[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(04): 1270-1277. |
| [10] |
ZHOU Bing, LI Bing-xuan*, HE Xuan, LIU He-xiong，WANG Fa-zhen. Classification of Camouflages Using Hyperspectral Images Combined With Fusing Adaptive Sparse Representation and Correlation Coefficient[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(12): 3851-3856. |
| [11] |
ZHANG Liu1, YE Nan1, MA Ling-ling2, WANG Qi2, LÜ Xue-ying1, ZHANG Jia-bao1*. Hyperspectral Band Selection Based on Improved Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(10): 3194-3199. |
| [12] |
YANG Bao-hua1, GAO Yuan1, WANG Meng-xuan1, QI Lin1, NING Jing-ming2. Estimation Model of Polyphenols Content in Yellow Tea Based on Spectral-Spatial Features[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(03): 936-942. |
| [13] |
ZHAO Peng1,2*, HAN Jin-cheng1, WANG Cheng-kun1. Wood Species Classification With Microscopic Hyper-Spectral Imaging Based on I-BGLAM Texture and Spectral Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(02): 599-605. |
| [14] |
ZHAO Fan, YAN Zhao-ru, XUE Jian-xin, XU Bing. Identification of Wild Black and Cultivated Goji Berries by Hyperspectral Image[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(01): 201-205. |
| [15] |
NING Hong-zhang1, 2, TAN Xin1*, LI Yu-hang1, 2, JIAO Qing-bin1, LI Wen-hao1. Joint Space-Spectrum SG Filtering Algorithms for Hyperspectral Images and Its Application[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(12): 3699-3704. |
|
|
|
|
