光谱学与光谱分析 |
|
|
|
|
|
Analysis of Observers Metamerism Differences for Different Retinal Cone Visual Responses |
HUANG Min1, CUI Gui-hua2*, LIU Yu1, LIU Hao-xue1 |
1. School of Printing and Packing Engineering, Beijing Institute of Graphic Communication, Beijing 102600, China 2. School of Physics & Electronic Information Engineering, Wenzhou University,Wenzhou 325035,China |
|
|
Abstract In order to investigate the cone’s spectral responses under different conditions for different aged observers with normal color vision, nine color patches with different hue angles distributed uniformly on the CIELAB color space were prepared, and the 27~35 observers were organized to carry out color matching experiments on a monitor to match the nine printed color samples under four different viewing conditions including two illuminances, and two viewing fields. The spectral data obtained from the color matching experiments were compared with the spectral data of the nine target colors and used to test the performances of eleven color matching functions including CIE1931,CIE1964,CIE2006,Sarkar’s S1~S8 in terms of the percentage of the minimum CIEDE2000 value. For the four experiments, CIE2006 and S6 performed the best and with S1, S2 the worst. For different observers, the visual spectral responses’ of the retinal cone are different and the age has the obvious influence on the visual spectral responses. The observer metamerism is mainly caused by the different spectral response of the (λ) channel and for most observers the differences appeared at the responses of the peak wavelength, and the shift of the peak wavelength has no significant influence on the observers metamerism. The experimental results can provide evidences for the classification of the color matching functions for different observer categories and theoretical basis for the investigation of the observers metamerism.
|
Received: 2014-07-06
Accepted: 2014-11-12
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
CUI Gui-hua
E-mail: guihua.cui@gmail.com
|
|
[1] Guild J. Philosophical Trans. Royal Soc. London A, 1931,230:149. [2] Speranskaya N I. Optics and Spectroscopy,1959,7:424. [3] Fetudina M, Sarkar A, Urban P, et al. In Proceedings of the 19th Color and Imaging Conference, San Jose, CA, 2011. [4] CIE Technical Report, 2006. 170. [5] Sarkar A. Ph. D. thesis, Thomson Corporate Research, Rennes, France,2011. [6] CIE, CIE NEWS-92, CIE Technical Report, 2010. 7. [7] Sarkar F,Autrusseau F Viénot, Patrick Le Callet, et al. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 2011, 28: 2033. [8] HUANG Min, LIU Hao-xue, LIAO Ning-fang(黄 敏,刘浩学,廖宁放). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析),2013, 33(7):1886. [9] Witt K. Color Res. Appl., 1995, 20: 399. [10] HUANG Min, LIAO Ning-fang, LIU Hao-xue, et al(黄 敏, 廖宁放, 刘浩学, 等). Acta Optica Sinica(光学学报), 2008, 28(3): 599. [11] Luo M R, Cui G, Rigg B. Color Res. Appl., 2001, 26: 340. |
[1] |
GUO Chun-li, HUANG Min*, XI Yong-hui, PAN Jie. Influences of Different Viewing Fields on Color Perceptions Using the Displays With Different Primary Colors[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(12): 3765-3771. |
[2] |
HUANG Min, GUO Chun-li, HE Rui-li, XI Yong-hui. Classification of Color Matching Functions with the Method of Cluster Analysis[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(02): 454-460. |
[3] |
HE Rui-li, HUANG Min*, GUO Chun-li, XI Yong-hui. The Spectral Pseudoisochromatic Images for Testing Retinal Cone Spectral Responses of Observers with Normal Color Vision[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(08): 2454-2461. |
[4] |
HUANG Min, HE Rui-li, SHI Chun-jie, SHI Bing-jie, LIU Hao-xue. Test the Performances of Different Color Matching Functions with the Method of Comparison[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 38(07): 2241-2249. |
|
|
|
|