光谱学与光谱分析 |
|
|
|
|
|
Research on the Quantitative Analysis for In-Situ Detection of Acid Radical Ions Using Laser Raman Spectroscopy |
CHEN Jing, LI Ying*, DU Zeng-feng, GU Yan-hong, GUO Jin-jia |
Optics and Optoelectronics Laboratory, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China |
|
|
Abstract Laser Raman spectroscopy as an in situ analytical technology can enable detailed investigation of the ocean environment. It is necessary to set up a quantitative analysis method based on laser Raman spectroscopy to understand the marine status in situ. In the laboratory investigations, varied concentration of HCO-3, SO2-4 and coastal waters of Qingdao are taken as the samples, operating 532 nm of laser, using fiber optic probes to simulate detection mode in situ. Raman spectra are analyzed using the method of internal standard normalization, multiple linear regression(MLR), general Partial Least Squares(PLS) and PLS based on dominant factor respectively in data processing. It was found that correlation coefficients of calibration curves are not high in internal standard normalization method and predicted relative errors on the prepared samples are much high, so internal standard normalization method cannot be effectively used in the quantitative analysis of HCO-3, SO2-4 in the water. And with the multiple linear regression, the analysis accuracy was improved effectively. The calibration curve of PLS based on dominant factor showed that the SO2-4 and HCO-3 of pre-made solution with correlation coefficient R2 of 0.990 and 0.916 respectively. The 30 mmol·L-1 of SO2-4 and 20 mmol·L-1 of HCO-3 in two target samples were determined with the relative errors lower than 3.262% and 5.267% respectively. SO2-4 in the coastal waters as the research object was analyzed by above-mentioned methods, comparing with 28.01 mmol·L-1 by ion chromatography. It was demonstrated that PLS based on dominant factor method is superior to the rest of the three analysis methods, which can be used in situ calibration, with the mean relative error about 1.128%. All the results show that analysis accuracy would be improved by the PLS based on dominant factor method to predict concentration of acid radical ions.
|
Received: 2014-07-13
Accepted: 2014-10-12
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
LI Ying
E-mail: liying@ouc.edu.cn
|
|
[1] Shanghai Marine Science and Technology Research Center, State Key Laboratory of Marine Geology(上海海洋科技研究中心, 海洋地质国家重点实验室). Seafloor Observatory-the Combination of Science and Technology(海底观测-科学与技术的结合). Shanghai: Tongji University Press(上海: 同济大学出版社), 2011. [2] QU Jian-sheng, SUN Cheng-quan, ZHANG Zhi-qiang, et al(曲建升, 孙成权, 张志强, 等). Advance in Earth Sciences(地球科学进展), 2003, 18(6): 981. [3] Tommy S Moore, Katherine M Mullaugh, Rebecca R Holyoke, et al. Annual Review of Marine Science, 2009, 1: 91. [4] Mark S Varney. Chemical Sensors in Oceanography. CRC Press, 2000. [5] Brewer P G, Malby G, Pasteris J D, et al. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research, 2004, 51(5): 739. [6] Breier J A, Christopher R German, Sheri N White. Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, 2009, 10(5): QOST05. [7] ZOU Xiao-yan, Lü Xin-biao, HE Mou-chun(邹晓艳, 吕新彪, 何谋春). Rock and Mineral Analysis(岩矿测试), 2007, 26(1): 26. [8] YE Mei-fang, WANG Zhi-hai, TANG Nan-an(叶美芳, 王志海, 唐南安). Northwestern Geology(西北地质), 2009, 42(3) : 120. [9] Zhang Xin, Peter M Walz, William J Kirkwood, et al. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers, 2010, 57(2): 297. [10] Tina M Battaglia, Eileen E Dunn, Marvin D Lilley, et al. The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2004, 129: 602. [11] Gumin Kang, Kwangchil Lee, Haesung Park, et al. Talanta, 2010, 81: 1413. [12] Feng Jie, Wang Zhe, Logan West, et al. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2011, 400: 3261. [13] McCreery R L. Raman Spectroscopy for Chemical Analysis, 2005. |
[1] |
ZHENG Pei-chao, YIN Yi-tong, WANG Jin-mei*, ZHOU Chun-yan, ZHANG Li, ZENG Jin-rui, LÜ Qiang. Study on the Method of Detecting Phosphate Ions in Water Based on
Ultraviolet Absorption Spectrum Combined With SPA-ELM Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 82-87. |
[2] |
LI Yu1, ZHANG Ke-can1, PENG Li-juan2*, ZHU Zheng-liang1, HE Liang1*. Simultaneous Detection of Glucose and Xylose in Tobacco by Using Partial Least Squares Assisted UV-Vis Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 103-110. |
[3] |
LIU Hao-dong1, 2, JIANG Xi-quan1, 2, NIU Hao1, 2, LIU Yu-bo1, LI Hui2, LIU Yuan2, Wei Zhang2, LI Lu-yan1, CHEN Ting1,ZHAO Yan-jie1*,NI Jia-sheng2*. Quantitative Analysis of Ethanol Based on Laser Raman Spectroscopy Normalization Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3820-3825. |
[4] |
LIN Hong-jian1, ZHAI Juan1*, LAI Wan-chang1, ZENG Chen-hao1, 2, ZHAO Zi-qi1, SHI Jie1, ZHOU Jin-ge1. Determination of Mn, Co, Ni in Ternary Cathode Materials With
Homologous Correction EDXRF Analysis[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3436-3444. |
[5] |
HUANG Li, MA Rui-jun*, CHEN Yu*, CAI Xiang, YAN Zhen-feng, TANG Hao, LI Yan-fen. Experimental Study on Rapid Detection of Various Organophosphorus Pesticides in Water by UV-Vis Spectroscopy and Parallel Factor Analysis[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3452-3460. |
[6] |
LI Zhong-bing1, 2, JIANG Chuan-dong2, LIANG Hai-bo3, DUAN Hong-ming2, PANG Wei2. Rough and Fine Selection Strategy Binary Gray Wolf Optimization
Algorithm for Infrared Spectral Feature Selection[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3067-3074. |
[7] |
LIU Shu1, JIN Yue1, 2, SU Piao1, 2, MIN Hong1, AN Ya-rui2, WU Xiao-hong1*. Determination of Calcium, Magnesium, Aluminium and Silicon Content in Iron Ore Using Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Assisted by Variable Importance-Back Propagation Artificial Neural Networks[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3132-3142. |
[8] |
JIA Hao1, 3, 4, ZHANG Wei-fang1, 3, LEI Jing-wei1, 3*, LI Ying-ying1, 3, YANG Chun-jing2, 3*, XIE Cai-xia1, 3, GONG Hai-yan1, 3, DING Xin-yu1, YAO Tian-yi1. Study on Infrared Fingerprint of the Classical Famous
Prescription Yiguanjian[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3202-3210. |
[9] |
KONG De-ming1, LIU Ya-ru1, DU Ya-xin2, CUI Yao-yao2. Oil Film Thickness Detection Based on IRF-IVSO Wavelength Optimization Combined With LIF Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2811-2817. |
[10] |
ZHAO Yu-wen1, ZHANG Ze-shuai1, ZHU Xiao-ying1, WANG Hai-xia1, 2*, LI Zheng1, 2, LU Hong-wei3, XI Meng3. Application Strategies of Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy in Simultaneous Detection of Multiple Pathogens[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(07): 2012-2018. |
[11] |
LUO Dong-jie, WANG Meng, ZHANG Xiao-shuan, XIAO Xin-qing*. Vis/NIR Based Spectral Sensing for SSC of Table Grapes[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(07): 2146-2152. |
[12] |
WANG Bin1, 2, ZHENG Shao-feng2, GAN Jiu-lin1, LIU Shu3, LI Wei-cai2, YANG Zhong-min1, SONG Wu-yuan4*. Plastic Reference Material (PRM) Combined With Partial Least Square (PLS) in Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) in the Field of Quantitative Elemental Analysis[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(07): 2124-2131. |
[13] |
CHENG Xiao-xiang1, WU Na2, LIU Wei2*, WANG Ke-qing2, LI Chen-yuan1, CHEN Kun-long1, LI Yan-xiang1*. Research on Quantitative Model of Corrosion Products of Iron Artefacts Based on Raman Spectroscopic Imaging[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(07): 2166-2173. |
[14] |
ZHANG Mei-zhi1, ZHANG Ning1, 2, QIAO Cong1, XU Huang-rong2, GAO Bo2, MENG Qing-yang2, YU Wei-xing2*. High-Efficient and Accurate Testing of Egg Freshness Based on
IPLS-XGBoost Algorithm and VIS-NIR Spectrum[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(06): 1711-1718. |
[15] |
CHEN Rui1, WANG Xue1, 2*, WANG Zi-wen1, QU Hao1, MA Tie-min1, CHEN Zheng-guang1, GAO Rui3. Wavelength Selection Method of Near-Infrared Spectrum Based on
Random Forest Feature Importance and Interval Partial
Least Square Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(04): 1043-1050. |
|
|
|
|