| 光谱学与光谱分析 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Assessment of Chlorophyll Content Using a New Vegetation Index Based on Multi-Angular Hyperspectral Image Data |
| LIAO Qin-hong1, 2, 3, ZHANG Dong-yan1, 2, 3*, WANG Ji-hua2, YANG Gui-jun2, YANG Hao2, Coburn Craig4, Wong Zhijie4, WANG Da-cheng3 |
1. Key Laboratory of Intelligent Computing & Signal Processing, Ministry of Education, Anhui University, Hefei 230039, China
2. Beijing Agriculture Information Technology Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China
3. Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China
4. Department of Geography, University of Lethbridge, Alberta T1K 3M4, Canada |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The fast estimation of chlorophyll content is significant for understanding the crops growth, monitoring the disease and insect, and assessing the yield of crops. This study gets the hyperspectral imagery data by using a self-developed multi-angular acquisition system during the different maize growth period, the reflectance of maize canopy was extracted accurately from the hyperspectral images under different view angles in the principal plane. The hot-dark-spot index (HDS) of red waveband was calculated through the analysis of simulated values by ACRM model and measured values, then this index was used to modify the vegetation index (TCARI), thus a new vegetation index (HD-TCARI) based on the multi-angular observation was proposed. Finally, the multi-angular hyperspectral imagery data was used to validate the vegetation indexes. The result showed that HD-TCARI could effectively reduce the LAI effects on the assessment of chlorophyll content. When the chlorophyll content was greater than 30 μg·cm-2, the correlation (R2) between HD-TCARI and LAI was only 26.88%～28.72%. In addition, the HD-TCARI could resist the saturation of vegetation index during the assessment of high chlorophyll content. When the LAI varied from 1 to 6, the linear relation between HD-TCARI and chlorophyll content could be improved by 9% compared with TCARI. The ground validation of HD-TCARI by multi-angular hyperspectral image showed that the linear relation between HD-TCARI and chlorophyll content (R2=66.74%) was better than the TCARI (R2=39.92%), which indicated that HD-TCARI has good potentials for estimating the chlorophyll content.
|
|
Received: 2013-07-24
Accepted: 2013-11-15
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
ZHANG Dong-yan
E-mail: hello-lion@hotmail.com
|
|
[1] Main R, Cho M A, Mathieu R, et al. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2011, 66(6): 751.
[2] Liao Qinhong, Wang Jihua, Yang Guijun, et al. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 2013, 7(1): 073575.
[3] Gitelson A A, Keydan G P, Merzlyak M N. Geophysical Research Letters, 2006, 33: 1.
[4] Sims D A, Gamon J A. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2002, 81(2-3): 337.
[5] Huang W J, Wang Z J, Huang L S, et al. Precision Agriculture, 2011, 12(2): 165.
[6] ZHANG Dong-yan, SONG Xiao-yu, MA Zhi-hong, et al(张东彦, 宋晓宇, 马智宏, 等). Scientia Agricultura Sinica(中国农业科学), 2010, 43(11): 2239.
[7] Kuusk A. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 2001, 71(1): 1.
[8] Kuusk A. Remote Sensing of Environment，1994, 50(2): 75.
[9] Kuusk A. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology，1995, 76(3-4): 221.
[10] Kim M S, Daughtry C S T, Chappelle E W, et al. Proceedings of the 6th Symposium on Physical Measurements and Signatures in Remote Sensing，1994. 299.
[11] Daughtry C S T, Walthall C L, Kim M S, et al. Remote Sensing of Environment，2000, 74(2): 229.
[12] Haboudane D, Miller J R, Tremblay N, et al. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2002, 81(2-3): 416.
[13] Lacaze R, Chen J M, Roujean J L, et al. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2002, 79(1): 84.
[14] CHEN Han-yue, NIU Zheng, HUANG Wen-jiang, et al(陈瀚阅, 牛 铮, 黄文江, 等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2012, 28(1): 167.
[15] MENG Qing-ye, DONG Heng, QIN Qi-ming, et al(孟庆野, 董 恒, 秦其明, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2012, 32(8): 2218.
[16] le Maire G, Franois C, Dufrêne E. Remote Sensing of Environment，2004, 89(1): 1.
[17] Wu Chaoyang, Niu Zheng, Tang Quan, et al. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2008, 148(8-9): 1230. |
| [1] |
LI Hu1, ZHONG Yun1, 2, FENG Ya-ting1, LIN Zhen1, ZHU Shi-jiang1, 2*. Multi-Vegetation Index Soil Moisture Inversion Model Based on UAV
Remote Sensing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 207-214. |
| [2] |
SHEN Si-cong, ZHANG Jing-xue, CHEN Ming-hui, LI Zhi-wei, SUN Sheng-nan, YAN Xue-bing*. Estimation of Above-Ground Biomass and Chlorophyll Content of
Different Alfalfa Varieties Based on UAV Multi-Spectrum[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3847-3852. |
| [3] |
LI Si-yuan, JIAO Jian-nan, WANG Chi*. Specular Reflection Removal Method Based on Polarization Spectrum
Fusion and Its Application in Vegetation Health Monitoring[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3607-3614. |
| [4] |
ZHENG Shu-yuan1, 2, HAI Yan1, 2, HE Meng-qi1, 2, WANG Jian-xiong1, 2. Construction of Vegetation Index in Visible Light Band of GF-6 Image With Higher Discrimination[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3509-3517. |
| [5] |
FU Xiao-man1, 2, BAO Yu-long1, 2*, Bayaer Tubuxin1, 2, JIN Eerdemutu1, 2, BAO Yu-hai1, 2. Spectral Characteristics Analysis of Desert Steppe Vegetation Based on Field Online Multi-Angle Spectrometer[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3170-3179. |
| [6] |
WANG Jing-yong1, XIE Sa-sa2, 3, GAI Jing-yao1*, WANG Zi-ting2, 3*. Hyperspectral Prediction Model of Chlorophyll Content in Sugarcane Leaves Under Stress of Mosaic[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2885-2893. |
| [7] |
LIU Zhao1, 2, LI Hua-peng1, CHEN Hui1, 2, ZHANG Shu-qing1*. Maize Yield Forecasting and Associated Optimum Lead Time Research Based on Temporal Remote Sensing Data and Different Model[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2627-2637. |
| [8] |
MA Bao-dong, YANG Xiang-ru, JIANG Zi-wei, CHE De-fu. Influence and Quantitative Analysis of Coal Dust Retention on Reflectance Spectra and Vegetation Index of Leaves[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(06): 1947-1952. |
| [9] |
REN Hong-rui1, 2, ZHANG Yue-qi2, HE Qi-jin3, LI Rong-ping1, ZHOU Guang-sheng4, 5*. Extraction of Pddy Rice Planting Area Based on Multi-Temporal FY-3 MERSI Remote Sensing Images[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(05): 1606-1611. |
| [10] |
FAN Yi-guang1, 3, 5, FENG Hai-kuan1, 2, 3*, LIU Yang1, 3, 4, BIAN Ming-bo1, 3, ZHAO Yu1, 3, YANG Gui-jun1, 3, QIAN Jian-guo5. Estimation of Nitrogen Content in Potato Plants Based on Spectral Spatial Characteristics[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(05): 1532-1540. |
| [11] |
MENG Hao-ran1, 2, LI Cun-jun1, 3*, ZHENG Xiang-yu1, 2, GONG Yu-sheng2, LIU Yu1, 3, PAN Yu-chun1, 3. Research on Extraction of Camellia Oleifera by Integrating Spectral, Texture and Time Sequence Remote Sensing Information[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(05): 1589-1597. |
| [12] |
WANG Shao-yan1, CHEN Zhi-fei2, LUO Yang1, JIAN Chun-xia1, ZHOU Jun-jie3, JIN Yuan1, XU Pei-dan3, LEI Si-yue3, XU Bing-cheng1, 4*. Study on Nutrient Content of Bothriochloa Ischaemum Community in the Loess Hilly-Gully Region Based on Spectral Characteristics[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(05): 1612-1621. |
| [13] |
WANG Yan-cang1, 4, LI Xiao-fang2, LI Li-jie5, LI Nan1, 4*, JIANG Qian-nan1, 4, GU Xiao-he3, YANG Xiu-feng1, 4LIN Jia-lu1, 4. Quantitative Inversion of Chlorophyll Content in Stem and Branch of
Pitaya Based on Discrete Wavelet Differential Transform Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(02): 549-556. |
| [14] |
LI Xiao-kai, YU Hai-ye, YU Yue, WANG Hong-jian, ZHANG Lei, ZHANG Xin, SUI Yuan-yuan*. Inversion Model of Clorophyll Content in Rice Based on a Bonic
Optimization Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(01): 93-99. |
| [15] |
FENG Hai-kuan1, 2, TAO Hui-lin1, ZHAO Yu1, YANG Fu-qin3, FAN Yi-guang1, YANG Gui-jun1*. Estimation of Chlorophyll Content in Winter Wheat Based on UAV Hyperspectral[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(11): 3575-3580. |
|
|
|
|
