光谱学与光谱分析 |
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution Characteristics of Soil Cadmium in Different Textured Paddy Soil Profiles and Its Relevance with Cadmium Uptake by Crops |
QIN Yu-sheng1, 2, ZHAN Shao-jun2, YU Hua2, TU Shi-hua2, WANG Zheng-yin1* |
1. College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing 400716, China 2. Soil and Fertilizer Institute, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chengdu 610066, China |
|
|
Abstract Adopting atomic absorption spectrometry (novAA400), the present study investigated the distribution characteristics of soil cadmium (Cd) in different textured paddy soil profiles under rice-wheat rotation and its correlation with Cd uptake by rice and wheat in Chengdu Plain through repeatedly taking soil and plant samples at the fixed sites in the field. The results revealed that Cd in the paddy soil profiles was mainly concentrated at the plough layer (0~15 cm) that obviously featured ‘Cd accumulates towards the rooting layer’. Soil total Cd and available Cd (1 mol·L-1 MgCl2 extraction) in the profile declined with soil depths and its average values at 30~45 cm only accounted for 47.60% and 39.49% of those at 0~15 cm. The potential downward movement of Cd in the different textured soil profiles was observed as sandy loam>heavy loam>loam. There was no significant correlation between soil pH and available Cd(r=-0.46) at 0~15 cm soil depth, while significantly negative correlations between soil pH and available Cd were observed at 15~30 cm (r=-0.78) and 30~45 cm (r=-0.86). The results further demonstrated that the Cd contents in either grain or straw of rice and wheat were not well correlated with soil total Cd at any soil depth (r=-0.092~0.383 for rice and r=0.174~0.424 for wheat), but significantly correlated with soil available Cd at 0~15 cm and at 15~30 cm (r=0.766*~0.953**) despite insignificant correlation at 30~45 cm (r=0.526~0.584). It is strongly suggested that the soil available Cd can be used as a better criterion than the total soil Cd to rate Cd contaminated soils in relation to safety of agricultural products.
|
Received: 2012-07-03
Accepted: 2012-10-20
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
WANG Zheng-yin
E-mail: wang_zhengyin@163.com
|
|
[1] Urszula K, Rufus L C, James A R, et al. J. Environ. Qual., 2010, 39: 519. [2] Dudka S, Miller W P. Journal of Environ. Science and Health, 1999, 84(4): 681. [3] Taylor M D. The Science of Total Environment, 1997, 208: 123. [4] GONG Wei-qun, PAN Gen-xing(龚伟群, 潘根兴). Science & Technology Review(科技导报), 2006, 24(5): 43. [5] LI Ji-qiang, CHEN Xi-yong, TANG Yi-jia, et al(李继强, 陈锡永, 唐意佳, 等). China Public Health(中国公共卫生), 2001, 17(3): 196. [6] Tamer A Elbana, Selim H M. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J, 2010, 74(6): 1956. [7] Zhao Xiulan, Qing Changle, Wei Shiqiang. Pedosphere, 2001, 11(2): 137. [8] Loganathan P, Hedley M. J. Environmental Pollution, 1997, 95(3): 319. [9] Onyatta J, Huang P. Geoderma, 1999, 91: 87. [10] HU Kun, YU Hua, FENG Wen-qiang, et al(胡 坤, 喻 华, 冯文强, 等). Acta Ecologica Sinica(生态学报), 2011, 31(8): 2341. [11] ZHAO Jing, FENG Wen-qiang, QIN Yu-sheng, et al(赵 晶, 冯文强, 秦鱼生, 等). Acta Pedologica Sinica(土壤学报), 2010, 47(5): 953. [12] Tessier A,Campbell P G,Bisson M. Analytical Chemistry, 1979, 51: 844. [13] Holm P E,Andersen B B,Chrisrensen T H. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J, 1996, 60: 775. [14] SHI Jiachun, YU Xiulin, ZHANG Mingkui, et al. J. Environ. Qual., 2011, 40: 1695. [15] LI Shu-hui, ZENG Xi-bai, LI Liang-fang, et al(李树辉, 曾希柏, 李莲芳, 等). Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology(应用生态学报), 2010, 21(9): 2397. [16] HAN Xiao-kai, GAO Yue, LOU Yi-lai, et al(韩晓凯, 高 月, 娄翼来, 等). Journal of Safety & Environment(安全与环境学报), 2008, 8(3): 10. [17] DAI Gui-jin, Lwayishi Shinji, Miki Takaaki, et al(代贵金, 岩石真嗣, 三木孝昭, 等). Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University(沈阳农业大学学报), 2008, 39(3): 274. [18] WANG Jun-juan, YANG Zhao-sheng, ZHANG Li-zhen, et al(王俊娟, 杨兆生, 张立桢, 等). Journal of Triticeae Crops(麦类作物学报), 2000, 20(1): 51. [19] JI Shu-juan, WANG Jun-wei, WANG Yan-hong, et al(纪淑娟, 王俊伟, 王颜红, 等). Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University(沈阳农业大学学报), 2008, 39(2): 237. [20] YUAN Bo, FU Wa-li, LAN Jia-cheng, et al(袁 波, 傅瓦利, 蓝家程, 等). Journal of Soil and Water Conservation(水土保持学报), 2011, 25(5): 130. |
[1] |
ZHU Wen-jing1, 2,FENG Zhan-kang1, 2,DAI Shi-yuan1, 2,ZHANG Ping-ping3,JI Wen4,WANG Ai-chen1, 2,WEI Xin-hua1, 2*. Multi-Feature Fusion Detection of Wheat Lodging Information Based on UAV Multispectral Images[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 197-206. |
[2] |
ZHU Zhi-cheng1, WU Yong-feng2*, MA Jun-cheng2, JI Lin2, LIU Bin-hui3*, JIN Hai-liang1*. Response of Winter Wheat Canopy Spectra to Chlorophyll Changes Under Water Stress Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Remote Sensing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3524-3534. |
[3] |
FENG Hai-kuan1, 2, FAN Yi-guang1, TAO Hui-lin1, YANG Fu-qin3, YANG Gui-jun1, ZHAO Chun-jiang1, 2*. Monitoring of Nitrogen Content in Winter Wheat Based on UAV
Hyperspectral Imagery[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3239-3246. |
[4] |
ZHANG Jun-he, YU Hai-ye, DANG Jing-min*. Research on Inversion Model of Wheat Polysaccharide Under High Temperature and Ultraviolet Stress Based on Dual-Spectral Technique[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2705-2709. |
[5] |
ZHU Yu-chen1, 2, WANG Yan-cang3, 4, 5, LI Xiao-fang6, LIU Xing-yu3, GU Xiao-he4*, ZHAO Qi-chao3, 4, 5. Study on Quantitative Inversion of Leaf Water Content of Winter Wheat Based on Discrete Wavelet Technique[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2902-2909. |
[6] |
YE Wen-chao1, LUO Shui-yang1, LI Jin-hao1, LI Zhao-rong1, FAN Zhi-wen1, XU Hai-tao1, ZHAO Jing1, LAN Yu-bin1, 2, DENG Hai-dong1*, LONG Yong-bing1, 2, 3*. Research on Classification Method of Hybrid Rice Seeds Based on the Fusion of Near-Infrared Spectra and Images[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2935-2941. |
[7] |
SONG Cheng-yang1, GENG Hong-wei1, FEI Shuai-peng2, LI Lei2, GAN Tian2, ZENG Chao-wu3, XIAO Yong-gui2*, TAO Zhi-qiang2*. Study on Yield Estimation of Wheat Varieties Based on Multi-Source Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(07): 2210-2219. |
[8] |
ZHANG Jing, GUO Zhen, WANG Si-hua, YUE Ming-hui, ZHANG Shan-shan, PENG Hui-hui, YIN Xiang, DU Juan*, MA Cheng-ye*. Comparison of Methods for Water Content in Rice by Portable Near-Infrared and Visible Light Spectrometers[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(07): 2059-2066. |
[9] |
ZHOU Qi1, 2, WANG Jian-jun1, 2*, HUO Zhong-yang1, 2*, LIU Chang1, 2, WANG Wei-ling1, 2, DING Lin3. UAV Multi-Spectral Remote Sensing Estimation of Wheat Canopy SPAD Value in Different Growth Periods[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(06): 1912-1920. |
[10] |
YANG Liu1, GUO Zhong-hui1, JIN Zhong-yu1, BAI Ju-chi1, YU Feng-hua1, 2, XU Tong-yu1, 2*. Inversion Method Research of Phosphorus Content in Rice Leaves Produced in Northern Cold Region Based on WPA-BP[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(05): 1442-1449. |
[11] |
REN Hong-rui1, 2, ZHANG Yue-qi2, HE Qi-jin3, LI Rong-ping1, ZHOU Guang-sheng4, 5*. Extraction of Pddy Rice Planting Area Based on Multi-Temporal FY-3 MERSI Remote Sensing Images[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(05): 1606-1611. |
[12] |
LAI Si-han1, LIU Yan-song1, 2, 3*, LI Cheng-lin1, WANG Di1, HE Xing-hui1, LIU Qi1, SHEN Qian4. Study on Hyperspectral Inversion of Rare-Dispersed Element Cadmium Content in Lead-Zinc Ores[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(04): 1275-1281. |
[13] |
ZHANG Hai-yang, ZHANG Yao*, TIAN Ze-zhong, WU Jiang-mei, LI Min-zan, LIU Kai-di. Extraction of Planting Structure of Winter Wheat Using GBDT and Google Earth Engine[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(02): 597-607. |
[14] |
LI Yun-xia1, MA Jun-cheng2, LIU Hong-jie3, ZHANG Ling-xian1*. Tillering Number Estimation of Winter Wheat Based on Visible
Spectrogram and Lightweight Convolutional Neural Network[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(01): 273-279. |
[15] |
FENG Hai-kuan1, 2, TAO Hui-lin1, ZHAO Yu1, YANG Fu-qin3, FAN Yi-guang1, YANG Gui-jun1*. Estimation of Chlorophyll Content in Winter Wheat Based on UAV Hyperspectral[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(11): 3575-3580. |
|
|
|
|