| 光谱学与光谱分析 |
|
|
|
|
|
| The Multi-angle Polarization Spectral Character of Water and Its Applications in Water Color Remote Sensing |
| WU Tai-xia1,2,YAN Lei1*, XIANG Yun1,3, ZHAO Yun-sheng4,CHEN Wei1 |
1. Beijing Key Lab of Spatial Information Integration and 3S Engineering Applications, School of Earth and Space Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
2. Center for Remote Sensing and Mapping Science, the University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA
3. Hebei Meteorological Institute & Hebei Eco-Environmental Monitoring Laboratory, Shijiazhuang 050021, China
4. College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The reflectance of pure water is very low at visible and near infrared bands. Its spectral characteristics are not obvious. Water always shows dark hue in optical remote sensing images. This dark hue causes the difficulties in water remote sensing identification. There is an interesting phenomenon when the authors research the water polarization spectroscopy. The authors measured water’s polarization spectra and reflectance spectra at different view zenith angles using the ASD spectrometer. When the view zenith angle was zero (measured vertically), as the spectrum people commonly measure, there was no polarization phenomenon at the water surface, and the reflectance was low at each band. Along with the increase in view zenith angle, the DOP spectra curves increased evidently, while the reflectance curves only changed a little. When the view zenith angle was over 30 degree, the values of DOP spectrum were much larger than the reflectance spectrum values at the entire visible and near infrared bands. At some bands, the DOP value was several dozen times than its reflectance value. This phenomenon shows that the water’s brightness in DOP image is much higher than its brightness in intensity image under the same condition. This rule was verified by the PARASOL multiangle polarization satellite data. Comparing the average brightness of DOP images with the average brightness of intensity images at 490, 670 and 865 nm band, the former is higher than the latter apparently. The brighter DOP images are better for water remote sensing identification. It is the first time that the authors found this special multiangle polarization spectral character of water. It revealed the advantage of water detection using the multiangle polarization remote sensing data. This method solved the low reflectivity problem of water color remote sensing. It will greatly improve the capability of water remote sensing identification and the retrieval accuracy of water quality parameters.
|
|
Received: 2009-02-25
Accepted: 2009-05-26
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
YAN Lei
E-mail: lyan@pku.edu.cn
|
|
[1] Shaw J A, Marston C. Optics Express，2000, 7(11): 375.
[2] Cox C, Munk W. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1954, 44(11): 838.
[3] LI Yan, LI Jing(李 炎，李 京). Chinese Science Bulletin(科学通报), 2000, 45(10): 925.
[4] Wu Taixia, Zhao Yunsheng. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2005, 43(12): 2854.
[5] Henderson Bradley G, Theiler James, et al. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2003, 88(4): 453.
[6] Li X W，Strahler A H. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing, 1992, 30(2): 276.
[7] Csiszar I，Gutman G，Romanov P，et al. Remote Sensing of Environment，2001, 76(3): 399.
[8] Leroy M, Bréon F M. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1996, 57(2): 97.
[9] Egan W G，Duggin M J. Proc. SPIE，2000, 4133: 172.
[10] Shaw J A. Applied Optics, 1999, 38(15): 3157.
[11] Azzam R M A, Bashara N M. Ellipsometry and Polarized Light. North-Holland Publishing Company, 1997. 1.
[12] Nadal F，Bréon F M. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1999, 37(3): 1709.
[13] Bacour C，Bréon F M. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2005, 98(1): 80.
[14] Jozsef Gal, Gabor Horvath，et al. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2001, 76(1): 103.
[15] Heege T, Fischer J. Proc. SPIE Ocean Optics, 2000, 10: 16.
|
| [1] |
ZHENG Hong-quan, DAI Jing-min*. Research Development of the Application of Photoacoustic Spectroscopy in Measurement of Trace Gas Concentration[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 1-14. |
| [2] |
CHENG Jia-wei1, 2，LIU Xin-xing1, 2*，ZHANG Juan1, 2. Application of Infrared Spectroscopy in Exploration of Mineral Deposits: A Review[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 15-21. |
| [3] |
FAN Ping-ping，LI Xue-ying，QIU Hui-min，HOU Guang-li，LIU Yan*. Spectral Analysis of Organic Carbon in Sediments of the Yellow Sea and Bohai Sea by Different Spectrometers[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 52-55. |
| [4] |
LI Jie, ZHOU Qu*, JIA Lu-fen, CUI Xiao-sen. Comparative Study on Detection Methods of Furfural in Transformer Oil Based on IR and Raman Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 125-133. |
| [5] |
WANG Fang-yuan1, 2, HAN Sen1, 2, YE Song1, 2, YIN Shan1, 2, LI Shu1, 2, WANG Xin-qiang1, 2*. A DFT Method to Study the Structure and Raman Spectra of Lignin
Monomer and Dimer[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 76-81. |
| [6] |
BAI Xi-lin1, 2, PENG Yue1, 2, ZHANG Xue-dong1, 2, GE Jing1, 2*. Ultrafast Dynamics of CdSe/ZnS Quantum Dots and Quantum
Dot-Acceptor Molecular Complexes[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 56-61. |
| [7] |
XU Tian1, 2, LI Jing1, 2, LIU Zhen-hua1, 2*. Remote Sensing Inversion of Soil Manganese in Nanchuan District, Chongqing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 69-75. |
| [8] |
YANG Cheng-en1, 2, LI Meng3, LU Qiu-yu2, WANG Jin-ling4, LI Yu-ting2*, SU Ling1*. Fast Prediction of Flavone and Polysaccharide Contents in
Aronia Melanocarpa by FTIR and ELM[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 62-68. |
| [9] |
LIU Zhen1*, LIU Li2*, FAN Shuo2, ZHAO An-ran2, LIU Si-lu2. Training Sample Selection for Spectral Reconstruction Based on Improved K-Means Clustering[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 29-35. |
| [10] |
YANG Chao-pu1, 2, FANG Wen-qing3*, WU Qing-feng3, LI Chun1, LI Xiao-long1. Study on Changes of Blue Light Hazard and Circadian Effect of AMOLED With Age Based on Spectral Analysis[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 36-43. |
| [11] |
GAO Feng1, 2, XING Ya-ge3, 4, LUO Hua-ping1, 2, ZHANG Yuan-hua3, 4, GUO Ling3, 4*. Nondestructive Identification of Apricot Varieties Based on Visible/Near Infrared Spectroscopy and Chemometrics Methods[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 44-51. |
| [12] |
ZHENG Pei-chao, YIN Yi-tong, WANG Jin-mei*, ZHOU Chun-yan, ZHANG Li, ZENG Jin-rui, LÜ Qiang. Study on the Method of Detecting Phosphate Ions in Water Based on
Ultraviolet Absorption Spectrum Combined With SPA-ELM Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 82-87. |
| [13] |
XU Qiu-yi1, 3, 4, ZHU Wen-yue3, 4, CHEN Jie2, 3, 4, LIU Qiang3, 4 *, ZHENG Jian-jie3, 4, YANG Tao2, 3, 4, YANG Teng-fei2, 3, 4. Calibration Method of Aerosol Absorption Coefficient Based on
Photoacoustic Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 88-94. |
| [14] |
LI Xin-ting, ZHANG Feng, FENG Jie*. Convolutional Neural Network Combined With Improved Spectral
Processing Method for Potato Disease Detection[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 215-224. |
| [15] |
XING Hai-bo1, ZHENG Bo-wen1, LI Xin-yue1, HUANG Bo-tao2, XIANG Xiao2, HU Xiao-jun1*. Colorimetric and SERS Dual-Channel Sensing Detection of Pyrene in
Water[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 95-102. |
|
|
|
|
