光谱学与光谱分析 |
|
|
|
|
|
Wavelet Analysis and Its Application in Denoising the Spectrum of Hyperspectral Image |
ZHOU Dan1,WANG Qin-jun1,TIAN Qing-jiu2,LIN Qi-zhong1, FU Wen-xue1 |
1. Center for Earth Observation and Digital Earth,the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100086, China 2. International Institute for Earth System Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China |
|
|
Abstract In order to remove the sawtoothed noise in the spectrum of hyperspectral remote sensing and improve the accuracy of information extraction using spectrum in the present research, the spectrum of vegetation in the USGS (United States Geological Survey) spectrum library was used to simulate the performance of wavelet denoising. These spectra were measured by a custom-modified and computer-controlled Beckman spectrometer at the USGS Denver Spectroscopy Lab. The wavelength accuracy is about 5 nm in the NIR and 2 nm in the visible. In the experiment, noise with signal to noise ratio (SNR) 30 was first added to the spectrum, and then removed by the wavelet denoising approach. For the purpose of finding the optimal parameters combinations, the SNR, mean squared error (MSE), spectral angle (SA) and integrated evaluation coefficient η were used to evaluate the approach’s denoising effects. Denoising effect is directly proportional to SNR, and inversely proportional to MSE, SA and the integrated evaluation coefficient η. Denoising results show that the sawtoothed noise in noisy spectrum was basically eliminated, and the denoised spectrum basically coincides with the original spectrum, maintaining a good spectral characteristic of the curve. Evaluation results show that the optimal denoising can be achieved by firstly decomposing the noisy spectrum into 3-7 levels using db12, db10, sym9 and sym6 wavelets, then processing the wavelet transform coefficients by soft-threshold functions, and finally estimating the thresholds by heursure threshold selection rule and rescaling using a single estimation of level noise based on first-level coefficients. However, this approach depends on the noise level, which means that for different noise level the optimal parameters combination is also diverse.
|
Received: 2008-05-06
Accepted: 2008-08-08
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
ZHOU Dan
E-mail: dzhou@rsgs.ac.cn
|
|
[1] LIU Ming-cai(刘明才). Wavelet Analysis and Its Application(小波分析及其应用). Beijing: Tsinghua University Press(北京: 清华大学出版社), 2005. 125. [2] Donoho D L. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 1995, 41(3): 613. [3] LI Qing-wu, CHEN Xiao-gang(李庆武,陈小刚). Optical Technology(光学技术), 2006, 32(6): 831. [4] ZHANG Rong-xiang, LI Zheng-qiang, ZHENG Shi-jie(张荣祥,李正强,郑世杰). Transducer and Microsystem Technologies(传感器与微系统), 2007, 26(6): 20. [5] PAN Zhong-xiao, SUN Pei-yan, WANG Yong-ming, et al(潘忠孝,孙培艳,王永明,等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 1999, 19(3): 260. [6] MA Xiao-guo, ZHANG Zhan-xia(马晓国,张展霞). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2003, 23(3): 552. [7] WANG Ying, MO Jin-yuan(王瑛,莫金垣). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2005, 25(1): 124. [8] HAO Yong, CHEN Bin, ZHU Rui(郝勇,陈斌,朱锐). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2006, 26(10): 1838. [9] ZOU Xiao-bo, ZHAO Jie-wen, XIA Rong, et al(邹小波,赵杰文,夏蓉,等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Machinery(农业机械学报), 2006, 37(6): 79. [10] GUO Hao-yan,HU Shao-ming, QUAN Guang-ri, et al(郭嗥岩,胡绍明,权光日,等). Computer Engineering and Design(计算机工程与设计), 2007, 28(7): 1504. [11] ZHAO Rui-zhen, HU Zhan-yi, HU Shao-hai(赵瑞珍,胡占义,胡绍海). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2007, 27(8): 1644. [12] DU Yan, LIANG Da-kai(杜艳,梁大开). Chinese Journal of Quantum Electronics(量子电子学报), 2007, 24(3): 294. [13] WU Chuan-qing, TONG Qing-xi, ZHENG Lan-fen(吴传庆,童庆禧,郑兰芬). Remote Sensing Information(遥感信息), 2005, (4): 10. [14] LU Wei, YU Xu-chu, LIU Juan(路威,余旭初,刘娟). Jounral of Information Engineeirng University(信息工程大学学报), 2005, 6(2): 10. [15] Chang S G, Yu B, Vetterli M. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2000, 9(9): 1532. [16] Misiti M, Misiti Y, Oppenheim G, et al. Wavelet Toolbox 4 User’s Guide. Natick, MA: The MathWorks, Inc., 2007.
|
[1] |
WANG Cai-ling1,ZHANG Jing1,WANG Hong-wei2*, SONG Xiao-nan1, JI Tong3. A Hyperspectral Image Classification Model Based on Band Clustering and Multi-Scale Structure Feature Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 258-265. |
[2] |
GAO Hong-sheng1, GUO Zhi-qiang1*, ZENG Yun-liu2, DING Gang2, WANG Xiao-yao2, LI Li3. Early Classification and Detection of Kiwifruit Soft Rot Based on
Hyperspectral Image Band Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 241-249. |
[3] |
WU Hu-lin1, DENG Xian-ming1*, ZHANG Tian-cai1, LI Zhong-sheng1, CEN Yi2, WANG Jia-hui1, XIONG Jie1, CHEN Zhi-hua1, LIN Mu-chun1. A Revised Target Detection Algorithm Based on Feature Separation Model of Target and Background for Hyperspectral Imagery[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 283-291. |
[4] |
CHU Bing-quan1, 2, LI Cheng-feng1, DING Li3, GUO Zheng-yan1, WANG Shi-yu1, SUN Wei-jie1, JIN Wei-yi1, HE Yong2*. Nondestructive and Rapid Determination of Carbohydrate and Protein in T. obliquus Based on Hyperspectral Imaging Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3732-3741. |
[5] |
HUANG You-ju1, TIAN Yi-chao2, 3*, ZHANG Qiang2, TAO Jin2, ZHANG Ya-li2, YANG Yong-wei2, LIN Jun-liang2. Estimation of Aboveground Biomass of Mangroves in Maowei Sea of Beibu Gulf Based on ZY-1-02D Satellite Hyperspectral Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3906-3915. |
[6] |
ZHOU Bei-bei1, LI Heng-kai1*, LONG Bei-ping2. Variation Analysis of Spectral Characteristics of Reclaimed Vegetation in an Ionic Rare Earth Mining Area[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3946-3954. |
[7] |
YUAN Wei-dong1, 2, JU Hao2, JIANG Hong-zhe1, 2, LI Xing-peng2, ZHOU Hong-ping1, 2*, SUN Meng-meng1, 2. Classification of Different Maturity Stages of Camellia Oleifera Fruit
Using Hyperspectral Imaging Technique[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3419-3426. |
[8] |
FU Gen-shen1, LÜ Hai-yan1, YAN Li-peng1, HUANG Qing-feng1, CHENG Hai-feng2, WANG Xin-wen3, QIAN Wen-qi1, GAO Xiang4, TANG Xue-hai1*. A C/N Ratio Estimation Model of Camellia Oleifera Leaves Based on
Canopy Hyperspectral Characteristics[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3404-3411. |
[9] |
SHEN Ying, WU Pan, HUANG Feng*, GUO Cui-xia. Identification of Species and Concentration Measurement of Microalgae Based on Hyperspectral Imaging[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3629-3636. |
[10] |
XIE Peng, WANG Zheng-hai*, XIAO Bei, CAO Hai-ling, HUANG Yi, SU Wen-lin. Hyperspectral Quantitative Inversion of Soil Selenium Content Based on sCARS-PSO-SVM[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3599-3606. |
[11] |
QIAN Rui1, XU Wei-heng2, 3 , 4*, HUANG Shao-dong2, WANG Lei-guang2, 3, 4, LU Ning2, OU Guang-long1. Tea Plantations Extraction Based on GF-5 Hyperspectral Remote Sensing
Imagery in the Mountainous Area[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3591-3598. |
[12] |
ZHU Zhi-cheng1, WU Yong-feng2*, MA Jun-cheng2, JI Lin2, LIU Bin-hui3*, JIN Hai-liang1*. Response of Winter Wheat Canopy Spectra to Chlorophyll Changes Under Water Stress Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Remote Sensing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3524-3534. |
[13] |
YANG Lei1, 2, 3, ZHOU Jin-song1, 2, 3, JING Juan-juan1, 2, 3, NIE Bo-yang1, 3*. Non-Uniformity Correction Method for Splicing Hyperspectral Imager Based on Overlapping Field of View[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3582-3590. |
[14] |
SUN Lin1, BI Wei-hong1, LIU Tong1, WU Jia-qing1, ZHANG Bao-jun1, FU Guang-wei1, JIN Wa1, WANG Bing2, FU Xing-hu1*. Identification Algorithm of Green Algae Using Airborne Hyperspectral and Machine Learning Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3637-3643. |
[15] |
TAO Jing-zhe1, 3, SONG De-rui1, 3, SONG Chuan-ming2, WANG Xiang-hai1, 2*. Multi-Band Remote Sensing Image Sharpening: A Survey[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 2999-3008. |
|
|
|
|