|
|
|
|
|
|
| A Review of the Auxiliary Measurement of Nobble Gases in LIBS |
| XU Jie1, 2, 3, GU Yi1, 2*, SONG Bao-lin1, 2, GE Liang-quan1, ZHANG Qing-xian1, YANG Wen-jia4 |
1. College of Nuclear Technology and Automation Engineering, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
2. Applied Nuclear Technology in Geosciences Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
3. CGN Nuclear Engineering Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518124, China
4. Comprehensive Department, Sichuan Institute of Safety Science and Technology, Chengdu 610041, China
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) is an emission spectrum analysis technology which has great potential in the analysis of high-risk environments and important cultural relics due to the advantages of real-time, multi-element, non-destructive and long-range. Currently, LIBS measurement technology is still affected by experimental equipment and measurement environment, among which the influence of the atmosphere environment on LIBS measurement is particularly significant. Nobble gases are conducive to assisting LIBS measurement, enhancing the spectral signal, improving detection limit, etc., because of their excellent physical properties (specific heat capacity, conductivity, stable chemical properties, large relative molecular mass, etc.), which are increasingly used in laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy. Therefore, based on the detailed investigation of the application of inert gas in the LIBS measurement process, the influencing factors on the spectral signal are analyzed. For example, the very low chemical activity effectively reduces the absorption and annihilation of spectral signals by other gases in the air (oxygen, nitrogen, etc.). The large atomic volume greatly limits the outward expansion of the plasma, causing the temperature per unit volume to rise significantly; The abundance of electrons causes the free electrons in the generated plasma to rise greatly, which increases the electron density; The metastable state promotes the delayed excitation of inert gas to the sample, assists in the excitation of some lighter elements and greatly increases the plasma lifetime; The energy transfer can enhance the emission spectral of some special energy levels to obtain higher enhancement factors; The effect of radon gas on emission line enhancement through decay was also analyzed. However, the emission of inert gases can also be used to calculate the plasma temperature and electron density of samples, which has an important influence on the auxiliary measurement of LIBS. In addition, the application of metastable state in LIBS measurement and enhancement factor of inert gas on the spectral signal in different studies are also listed. Finally, the differences in signal enhancement, ablation quality and time evolution of different inert gases are analyzed and compared. It turns out that helium is special compared to other inert gases because of its physical properties and extra-nuclear structure. However, with the increase of cycle number, the signal enhancement factor of other gases gradually increases. At the same time, the ablation mass gradually decreases, and the time evolution of plasma is also getting longer, which provides theoretical support and reference for the selection of appropriate inert gases in LIBS measurement.
|
|
Received: 2022-08-04
Accepted: 2022-11-04
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
GU Yi
E-mail: guyi10@cdut.edu.cn
|
|
[1] Okonkwo E G, Wheatley G, He Y, et al. Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 2021, 174: 105813.
[2] Chen X, Ali S, Yuan L, et al, Elsevier Ltd, Chemosphere，2022，287：132172.
[3] Park J, Kumar S, Han S H, et al. Elsevier GmbH, Optik (Stuttg)，2021，247：167919.
[4] Keerthi K, George S D, Kulkarni S D, et al. Elsevier Ltd, Opt. Laser Technol.，2022，147：107622.
[5] D’Ulivo A, Onor M, Pitzalis E, et al. Spectrochim. Acta-Part B: At. Spectrosc.，2006，61：797.
[6] Chen T, Zhang T, Li H, et al. TrAC-Trends Anal. Chem., 2020, 133: 116113.
[7] Guo G, Niu G, Shi Q, et al. Anal. Methods, 2019, 11: 3006.
[8] Connors B, Somers A, Day D. Appl. Spectrosc., 2016, 70: 810.
[9] Pedarnig J D, Trautner S, Grünberger S, et al. Appl. Sci., 2021, 11: 9274.
[10] Ren J, Zhao Y, Yu K, et al. Comput. Electron. Agric., 2022, 197: 106986.
[11] Senesi G S, Cabral J, Menegatti C R, et al, Elsevier Ltd, TrAC-Trends Anal. Chem.，2019，118：453.
[12] Wallace S, Smith N, Nerantzis N. Archaeometry, 2021, 63: 343.
[13] Myakalwar A K, Sandoval C, Velásquez M, et al. Minerals, 2021, 11(10): e00121.
[14] Gonçalves D A, Senesi G S, Nicolodelli G. Trends Environ. Anal. Chem., 2021, 30: e00121.
[15] Zhang D, Chen A, Chen Y, et al. J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom., 2021, 36: 1280.
[16] Delgado T, Fortes F J, Cabalín L M, et al. Spectrochim. Acta-Part B: At. Spectrosc.，2022，192：106413.
[17] Yaroshchyk P, Morrison R J S, Body D, et al. Spectrochim. Acta-Part B: At. Spectrosc., 2005, 60: 1482.
[18] Popov A M, Colao F, Fantoni R, et al. At. Spectrom., 2009, 24: 602.
[19] Hussain A, Xun G, Asghar H, et al. Opt. Spectrosc., 2021, 129: 452.
[20] Vieira A L, Ferreira E C, Júnior D S, et al. At. Spectrosc., 2021, 42: 18.
[21] Liu Y, Baudelet M, Richardson M, et al. At. Spectrom., 2010, 25: 1316.
[22] Liu X, Liu J, Lin Q, et al. J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom.，2021，36：2173.
[23] Jamil S, Liaqat U, Ahmed N, et al. Phys. B Condens. Matter.，2022，627：413620.
[24] Neo E R K, Yeo Z, Low J S C, et al. Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 2022, 180: 106217.
[25] Zhou R, Liu K, Tang Z, et al. J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom., 2021, 36: 614.
[26] Cowpe J S, Pilkington R D. Vacuum., 2008, 82: 1341.
[27] Scott J R, Effenberger A J, Hatch J J. Springer Ser. Opt. Sci., 2014, 182: 91.
[28] Dawood M S, Margot J. AIP Adv., 2014, 4: 3.
[29] Effenberger A J, Scott J R. Sensors., 2010, 10: 4907.
[30] Vors E, Gallou C, Salmon L, et al. Spectrochim. Acta-Part B: At. Spectrosc., 2008, 63: 1198.
[31] Xu N, Majidi V. Appl. Spectrosc., 1993, 47(8): 1134.
[32] Rezaei F, Tavassoli S H. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Appl. Phys. B Lasers Opt., 2015, 120: 563.
[33] Boudhib M, Hermann J, Dutouquet C. Anal. Chem., 2016, 88: 4029.
[34] Hrdlička A, Hegrová J, Havrlová E, et al. Elsevier, Spectrochim. Acta-Part B: At. Spectrosc., 2020, 170: 105919.
[35] Cristoforetti G, Legnaioli S, Palleschi V, et al, Spectrochim. Acta-Part B: At. Spectrosc., 2004, 59: 1907.
[36] Rajavelu H, Vasa N J, Seshadri S, et al. Spectrochim. Acta-Part B: Atom. Spectrosc., 2021, 181: 106215.
[37] Baudelet M, Boueri M, Yu J, et al. Spectrochim. Acta-Part B: At. Spectrosc., 2007, 62: 1329.
[38] Mousavi S J, Hemati Farsani M, Darbani S M R, et al. Appl. Phys. B Lasers Opt., 2016, 122.
[39] Mateo J, Quintero M C, Fernández J M, et al. Elsevier Ltd, Constr. Build. Mater., 2019，204：716.
[40] Asimellis G, Giannoudakos A, Kompitsas M. Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 2006, 385: 333.
[41] Quarles C D, Gonzalez J J, East L J, et al. J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom., 2014, 29: 1238.
[42] Barkhouse D A R, Gunawan O, Gokmen T, et al. Prog. Photovoltaics Res. Appl., 2015, 20: 6.
[43] Hai R, He Z, Yu X, et al. Opt. Express, 2019, 27: 2509.
[44] Rajavelu H, Vasa N J, Seshadri S. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Appl. Phys. A, 2020, 126: 1.
[45] Yu J, Hou Z, Ma Y, et al. Elsevier, Spectrochim. Acta-Part B: At. Spectrosc., 2020, 174: 105992.
[46] Gao X, Liu L, Song C, et al. IOP Publishing, J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys.，2015，48：175205.
[47] Idris N, Pardede M, Jobiliong E, et al, Elsevier, Spectrochim. Acta-Part B: At. Spectrosc., 2019, 151: 26.
[48] Imashuku S, Kamimura T, Kashiwakura S, et al. Anal. Chem., 2020, 92: 11171.
[49] Suyanto H, Lie Z S, Niki H, et al. Anal. Chem., 2012, 84: 2224.
[50] Owens M, Majidi V. Appl. Spectrosc., 1991, 45: 1463.
[51] Abdulmadjid S N, Suliyanti M M, Kurniawan K H, et al. Appl. Phys. B-Lasers Opt., 2006, 82: 161.
[52] Pardede M, Karnadi I, Hedwig R, et al. Nature Publishing Group UK, Sci. Rep., 2021, 11: 1.
[53] Khumaeni A, Budi W S, Wardaya A Y, et al. Rasayan J. Chem., 2021, 14: 2413.
[54] Ünal Ye瘙塂iller S, Yalçin 瘙塁. Anal. Chim. Acta, 2013, 770: 7.
[55] Kumar M, Behera N, Singh R K, et al. Solid State Phys., 2022, 429: 127968.
[56] Arora G, Thomas J, Joshi H C. J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom., 2022, 65.
[57] Hashemi M M, Parvin P, Moosakhani A, et al. AIP Adv., 2014, 6: 4.
[58] Barreda F A, Trichard F, Barbier S, et al. Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 2012, 403: 2601.
[59] Farooq W A, Tawfik W, Alahmed Z A, et al. J. Russ. Laser Res., 2014, 35: 252.
[60] Lee Y I, Song K, Cha H K, et al. Appl. Spectrosc., 1997, 51: 959.
[61] Burger M, Garrett L, Burak A J, et al. J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom., 2021, 36: 824.
[62] Jobiliong E, Suyanto H, Marpaung A M, et al. Appl. Spectrosc., 2015, 69: 1.
[63] Son J G, Choi S C, Oh M K, et al. Appl. Spectrosc., 2010, 64: 1289.
[64] Kim C K, In J H, Lee S H, et al. J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2013, 28: 460.
[65] Kim D E, Yoo K J, Park H K, et al. Appl. Spectrosc., 1997, 51: 22.
[66] Sdorra W, Niemax K. Mikrochim. Acta, 1992, 107: 319.
[67] Khumaeni A, Akaoka K, Miyabe M, et al. Opt. Commun., 2021, 479: 126457.
[68] Nakamura S, Wagatsuma K. Spectrochim. Acta-Part B: At. Spectrosc., 2007, 62: 1303.
[69] Mateo M P, Piñon V, Anglos D, et al. Spectrochim. Acta-Part B: At. Spectrosc., 2012, 74-75：18.
[70] Bogaerts A, Chen Z, Bleiner D. J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom., 2006, 21: 384.
[71] Bordel N, Fernández-Menéndez L J, Méndez-López C, et al. J. Pisonero, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion, 2022, 64(5): 054010.
[72] Dong M, Mao X, Gonzalez J J, et al. J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom., 2012, 27: 2066.
|
| [1] |
ZHANG Ning-chao1, YE Xin1, LI Duo1, XIE Meng-qi1, WANG Peng1, LIU Fu-sheng2, CHAO Hong-xiao3*. Application of Combinatorial Optimization in Shock Temperature
Inversion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3666-3673. |
| [2] |
TANG Yi-chuan1, CUI Yan-jie1, ZHANG Jian-ying1, HE Sheng2, ZHOU Tao1*, WU Bing1. Determination of Trace Oxygen in High Purity Gold by Using Inert Gas Fusion Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(02): 622-626. |
| [3] |
HU Guo-qing1, 2, GUAN Ying-chun1, 2, 3*. Research Progress of Spectral Measurement on the On-Line Monitoring of Laser Processing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(08): 2343-2356. |
| [4] |
TIAN Li-qiao1, LI Sen1*, SUN Xiang-han1, TONG Ru-qing1, SONG Qing-jun2, SUN Zhao-hua3, LI Yong1. Development of a Novel Floating Water Spectral Measurement System Based on Skylight-Blocked Approach[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(09): 2756-2763. |
| [5] |
MA Ben-xue1,2*, YU Guo-wei1,2, WANG Wen-xia1,2, LUO Xiu-zhi1,2, LI Yu-jie1,2, LI Xiao-zhan1,2, LEI Sheng-yuan1,2. Recent Advances in Spectral Analysis Techniques for Non-Destructive Detection of Internal Quality in Watermelon and Muskmelon: A Review[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(07): 2035-2041. |
| [6] |
XIAO Xiao1,2, LI Fang2*, HUA Xue-ming2, ZHANG Ke-ke1. Dynamic Diagnostic of Physical Property in P-TIG Argon-Nitrogen Shielded Arc Plasma with Optical Emission Spectrometry[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(12): 3692-3697. |
| [7] |
HANG Le, XU Zhou-yi, HANG Wei*, HUANG Ben-li*. Recent Technical and Application Development of Atomic Spectrometry in China[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(05): 1329-1339. |
| [8] |
XU Rong1, 2, ZHAO Fei1, 2, ZHOU Jin-song1, 2. Progress of Spectral Measurements and Characterization for Non-Resolved Space Objects[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(02): 333-339. |
| [9] |
LI Shi-wei1,2, WANG Zhao-ba1,2, ZHANG Rui1,2，WANG Zhi-bin1,2,3. Spectral Measurements Based on Difference Frequency Modulation of Two PEMs Modulators[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2017, 37(09): 2966-2973. |
| [10] |
SONG Xiang-zhong, TANG Guo, ZHANG Lu-da, XIONG Yan-mei, MIN Shun-geng*. Research Advance of Variable Selection Algorithms in Near Infrared Spectroscopy Analysis[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2017, 37(04): 1048-1052. |
| [11] |
LI Zhi-hua, ZHENG Zu-ci, WENG Cun-cheng, LIN Duo, WANG Qi-wen, FENG Shang-yuan*. The Application and Progress of Laser Tweezers Raman Spectroscopy in Biomedicine[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2017, 37(04): 1123-1129. |
| [12] |
YU Jing1*, ZHANG Yun1, PANG Song-ying2, WANG Ji-fen2 . Application of IR in the Field of Evidence Identification [J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2016, 36(09): 2807-2811. |
| [13] |
XUE Peng1, 2, 3, WANG Zhi-bin1, 2, 3*, ZHANG Rui1, 3, XUE Rui2, 3, ZHAO Tong-lin1, 3 . The Study of Precision Measurement Technology Based on AOTF Imaging Spectrum [J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2016, 36(08): 2664-2668. |
| [14] |
WANG Yu-jiang1, WANG Zhi-bin1, 2, 3*, WAN Yao-li1, SONG Yan-peng1, LI Jin-hua1, ZHANG Min-juan1, XUE Rui1 . The Study on the Influence of Spectral Diffraction Efficiency Based on the Matching Network of Wide Spectrum AOTF [J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2016, 36(07): 2300-2305. |
| [15] |
Abai Alghazi1, 2, LIU Jing1, DAI Kang1, SHEN Yi-fan1*. Quantum State-Resolved Energy Redistribution of CO2 from Collisions with Highly Vibrationally Excited NaH[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2016, 36(05): 1317-1322. |
|
|
|
|
