|
|
|
|
|
|
| Study on Maize Leaf Nitrogen Inversion Model Based on Equivalent Water Thickness Gradient |
| WANG Xi1, CHEN Gui-fen1,2*, CAO Li-ying1, MA Li1 |
1. College of Information Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China
2. Changchun Humanities and Sciences College, Changchun 130117, China
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract According to the actual need for rapid and non-destructive testing methods for nitrogen in maize production. Samples were divided according to the equivalent water thickness gradient, and a gradient continuous leaf nitrogen inversion model was established. The influence of water content on leaf reflectance characteristics and the accuracy of the inversion model is preliminarily explored. Firstly, the hyperspectral data of leaf-level are obtained, and then the samples are sorted and sliding divided according to the value of equivalent water thickness, and the subset set is established. In addition to the original spectral data, the parent set also adopts (1) baseline correction；(2) Scattering correction；(3) Smoothing methods, three categories of spectral transformation methods, while subsets do not use any spectral transformation techniques. A full band PLSR inversion model is established, the model accuracy is compared, and the influence of equivalent water thickness on modeling accuracy is preliminarily quantitatively evaluated. The experimental results show that: (1) among the four groups of data, the inversion accuracy of three parent sets is lower than that of the optimal subset, and the other group is the same (2018 field-N: (parent set) R2CV=0.48<(subset) R2cv=0.57, RPDCV=1.38CV=1.52; 2018 field +N: R2CV=0.48<R2CV=0.7, RPDCV=1.39CV=1.8; 2019 field +N: R2CV=0.59<R2CV=0.68, RPDCV=1.57CV=1.77); (2) The inversion accuracy of the optimal subset of all the four groups reaches or even exceeds the level of the qualitative model, while the parent set has only two groups; (3) In the problem of sample selection of inversion data set, the factor of equivalent water thickness needs to be fully considered to avoid the loss of overall inversion accuracy caused by too wide sample selection. In conclusion, the factor of equivalent water thickness significantly impacts the accuracy of nitrogen modeling in maize leaves, which should not be ignored. After this factor is considered, the method of rapid, nondestructive detection of nitrogen in maize leaves using leaf hyperspectral data will be more reliable and feasible.
|
|
Received: 2021-07-17
Accepted: 2021-10-24
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
CHEN Gui-fen
E-mail: guifchen@163.com
|
|
[1] Gates D M, Keegan H J, Schleter J C, et al. Applied Optics, 1965, 4: 11.
[2] Kokaly R F, Clark R N. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1999, 67(3): 267.
[3] Palmer K F, Williams D. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1974, 64: 1107.
[4] Cater G A. American Journal of Botany, 1991, 78(7): 916.
[5] Liu L, Wang J, Huang W, et al. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2003, 25(17): 1688.
[6] Gao B C, Goetz A F H. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1994, 47(3): 369.
[7] Ramoelo A, Skidmore A K, Schlerf M, et al. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2011, 66(4): 408.
[8] Pacheco-Labrador J, González-Cascón R, Martín M, et al. International Journal of Applied Earth Observations & Geoinformation, 2014, 26(2): 105.
[9] Li D, Xue W, Zheng H, et al. Plant Methods, 2018, 14(1): 1.
[10] DENG Lai-fei, ZHANG Fei, ZHANG Hai-wei, et al（邓来飞, 张 飞, 张海威，等）. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2019, 39(1): 216.
[11] Ge Y, Atefi A, Zhang H, et al. Plant Methods, 2019, 15(1): 166.
[12] Helland I. Partial Least Squares Regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons，2004.
[13] Ge Y, Bai G, Stoerger V, et al. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture，2016, 127: 625.
[14] Neilson E H, Edwards A M, Blomstedt C K, et al. J. Exp. Bot., 2015, 66(7): 1817.
|
| [1] |
WANG Cai-ling1，ZHANG Jing1，WANG Hong-wei2*, SONG Xiao-nan1, JI Tong3. A Hyperspectral Image Classification Model Based on Band Clustering and Multi-Scale Structure Feature Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 258-265. |
| [2] |
GAO Hong-sheng1, GUO Zhi-qiang1*, ZENG Yun-liu2, DING Gang2, WANG Xiao-yao2, LI Li3. Early Classification and Detection of Kiwifruit Soft Rot Based on
Hyperspectral Image Band Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 241-249. |
| [3] |
WU Hu-lin1, DENG Xian-ming1*, ZHANG Tian-cai1, LI Zhong-sheng1, CEN Yi2, WANG Jia-hui1, XIONG Jie1, CHEN Zhi-hua1, LIN Mu-chun1. A Revised Target Detection Algorithm Based on Feature Separation Model of Target and Background for Hyperspectral Imagery[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 283-291. |
| [4] |
CHU Bing-quan1, 2, LI Cheng-feng1, DING Li3, GUO Zheng-yan1, WANG Shi-yu1, SUN Wei-jie1, JIN Wei-yi1, HE Yong2*. Nondestructive and Rapid Determination of Carbohydrate and Protein in T. obliquus Based on Hyperspectral Imaging Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3732-3741. |
| [5] |
HUANG You-ju1, TIAN Yi-chao2, 3*, ZHANG Qiang2, TAO Jin2, ZHANG Ya-li2, YANG Yong-wei2, LIN Jun-liang2. Estimation of Aboveground Biomass of Mangroves in Maowei Sea of Beibu Gulf Based on ZY-1-02D Satellite Hyperspectral Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3906-3915. |
| [6] |
ZHOU Bei-bei1, LI Heng-kai1*, LONG Bei-ping2. Variation Analysis of Spectral Characteristics of Reclaimed Vegetation in an Ionic Rare Earth Mining Area[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3946-3954. |
| [7] |
YUAN Wei-dong1, 2, JU Hao2, JIANG Hong-zhe1, 2, LI Xing-peng2, ZHOU Hong-ping1, 2*, SUN Meng-meng1, 2. Classification of Different Maturity Stages of Camellia Oleifera Fruit
Using Hyperspectral Imaging Technique[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3419-3426. |
| [8] |
FU Gen-shen1, LÜ Hai-yan1, YAN Li-peng1, HUANG Qing-feng1, CHENG Hai-feng2, WANG Xin-wen3, QIAN Wen-qi1, GAO Xiang4, TANG Xue-hai1*. A C/N Ratio Estimation Model of Camellia Oleifera Leaves Based on
Canopy Hyperspectral Characteristics[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3404-3411. |
| [9] |
SHEN Ying, WU Pan, HUANG Feng*, GUO Cui-xia. Identification of Species and Concentration Measurement of Microalgae Based on Hyperspectral Imaging[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3629-3636. |
| [10] |
XIE Peng, WANG Zheng-hai*, XIAO Bei, CAO Hai-ling, HUANG Yi, SU Wen-lin. Hyperspectral Quantitative Inversion of Soil Selenium Content Based on sCARS-PSO-SVM[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3599-3606. |
| [11] |
QIAN Rui1, XU Wei-heng2, 3 , 4*, HUANG Shao-dong2, WANG Lei-guang2, 3, 4, LU Ning2, OU Guang-long1. Tea Plantations Extraction Based on GF-5 Hyperspectral Remote Sensing
Imagery in the Mountainous Area[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3591-3598. |
| [12] |
ZHU Zhi-cheng1, WU Yong-feng2*, MA Jun-cheng2, JI Lin2, LIU Bin-hui3*, JIN Hai-liang1*. Response of Winter Wheat Canopy Spectra to Chlorophyll Changes Under Water Stress Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Remote Sensing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3524-3534. |
| [13] |
YANG Lei1, 2, 3, ZHOU Jin-song1, 2, 3, JING Juan-juan1, 2, 3, NIE Bo-yang1, 3*. Non-Uniformity Correction Method for Splicing Hyperspectral Imager Based on Overlapping Field of View[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3582-3590. |
| [14] |
SUN Lin1, BI Wei-hong1, LIU Tong1, WU Jia-qing1, ZHANG Bao-jun1, FU Guang-wei1, JIN Wa1, WANG Bing2, FU Xing-hu1*. Identification Algorithm of Green Algae Using Airborne Hyperspectral and Machine Learning Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3637-3643. |
| [15] |
TAO Jing-zhe1, 3, SONG De-rui1, 3, SONG Chuan-ming2, WANG Xiang-hai1, 2*. Multi-Band Remote Sensing Image Sharpening: A Survey[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 2999-3008. |
|
|
|
|
