集成SIFT算法与检测模型优化的UAV影像匹配方法

doi:10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2022)05-1497-07

Abstract
References
Related Citation (6)

Download: PDF (2410 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Low-altitude unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) measurement has become an important technical tool in the remote sensing field by the virtue of low-cost, high-efficiency, high-precision data acquisition mode and rapid acquisition images with high spatial resolution. Image matching technology is an important step in UAV image data processing, and the matching between images directly affects the accuracy and visual effect of the later 3D scenes. For the highland mountainous area, the topography is complex with large elevation changes, high vegetation cover and irregular distribution of features, making it difficult to match the images due to local noise in the UAV topographic survey processing. As the special terrain of the area limits the image acuqisition, large scene images need to be obtained by matching and stitching multiple images. At present, feature point-based image matching is an image alignment technique, which is applicable to the matching between low overlap images and can be applied to the matching between motion recovery images. To explore the fast and effective UAV image matching technique under special terrain and landscape conditions. This paper proposes an integration Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) algorithm, the Nearest Neighbor Distance Ratio (NNDR) algorithm and Random Sample Consensus (RANSAC) model constraints improved the UAV image matching method for complex terrain in highland mountains. The main technical process is as follows: Firstly, based on the SIFT algorithm for extreme value detection in scale space, a Gaussian pyramid function is constructed, and feature point localization is achieved by a Gaussian difference operation. It also performs statistical analysis on the neighborhood location, direction, and scale of the detected feature points to generate a description suitable for UAV image features. Secondly, the first constraint of feature pairs is extracted, and similarity is detected by integrating the “Mahalanobis distance” and NNDR models. On this basis, the RANSAC algorithm is used to introduce the root mean square error (RMSE) of the matched pairs for the second constraint, to achieve the rejection of the wrong matched pairs and ensure the accurate optimization of image matching. In addition, to confirm the effectiveness of the optimization algorithm proposed in this paper, one group of UAV image data of typical landscapes in the highland mountains were selected for matching tests. The results show that the improved algorithm proposed in this paper can extract a large number of point pairs and improve the correct detection rate of the same name points in UAV image matching for complex terrain in highland mountainous areas. Moreover, the correct rate of alignment reaches 85%, so it is more applicable to the optimization of UAV image matching processing technology for complex terrain in highland mountains.

Key words：UAV; Image registration; Improved SIFT algorithm; Contrastive analysis

Received: 2021-04-22 Accepted: 2021-06-21

ZTFLH:

P237

Corresponding Authors: GAN Shu E-mail: gs@kust.edu.cn

Cite this article:

GAO Sha,YUAN Xi-ping,GAN Shu, et al. UAV Image Matching Method Integrating SIFT Algorithm and Detection Model Optimization[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(05): 1497-1503.

URL:

https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2022)05-1497-07 OR https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/Y2022/V42/I05/1497

[1] YAO Yong-xiang, LI Jia, DUAN Ping, et al(姚永祥, 李佳, 段平, 等). Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University(武汉大学学报), https://doi.org/10.13203/j.whugis20200362.
[2] LI Ya-dong, CAO Ming-lan, LI Chang-qing, et al(李亚东, 曹明兰, 李长青，等). Scientia Silvae Sinicae(林业科学), 2020, 56(10): 113.
[3] XI Wen-fei(喜文飞). Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica(测绘学报), 2020, 49(8): 1071.
[4] TANG Ying-fu, WANG Zhong-jing, ZHANG Zi-xiong(唐颖复, 王忠静, 张子雄). Journal of Tsinghua University·Science and Technology(清华大学学报·自然科学版), 2021, 61(2): 161.
[5] YI Li-na, XU Xiao, ZHANG Gui-feng, et al(易俐娜, 许筱, 张桂峰，等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2019, 39(6): 1885.
[6] JIANG San, XU Zhi-hai, ZHANG Feng, et al(姜三, 许志海, 张峰，等). Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University(武汉大学学报信息科学版) , 2019, 44(8): 1153.
[7] Mousavi V, Varshosaz M, Remondino F. Remote Sensing, 2021, 13(7): 1302.
[8] ZHAN Zong-qian, LI Yi-hui, WANG Chen-dong, et al(詹总谦, 李一挥, 王陈东，等). Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University(武汉大学学报信息科学版) , 2018, 43(11): 1620.
[9] Gupta S, Thakur K, Kumar M. The Visual Computer, 2021，37: 447.
[10] Lowe D G. International Journal of Computer Vision, 2004, 60(2): 91.
[11] Rublee E, Rabaud V, Konolige K，et al. IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision，2011: 2564.
[12] Alcantarilla P F, Bartoli A, Davison A J. Computer Vision-ECCV 2012. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012: 214.
[13] ZENG Qing-hua, CHEN Yan, WANG Yun-shu, et al(曾庆化, 陈艳, 王云舒，等). Control and Decision(探制与决策), 2017, 32(12): 2233.
[14] DENG Shi-xiong, WANG Xiao-hong, LIU Ji-geng, et al(邓仕雄, 王晓红, 刘继庚, 等). Journal of Guizhou University·Natural Sciences(贵州大学学报·自然科学版) , 2018, 35(1): 35.
[15] ZHANG Pei-pei, WANG Yong-bo, SONG Wei(张培佩, 王永波, 宋伟). Journal of Hunan University of Science & Technology·Natural Science Edition(湖南科技大学学报·自然科学版), 2019, 34(2): 90.